Advertisement

The Effect of Major Pelvic Extirpative Surgery on Lower Urinary Tract Function

  • Kalli SpencerEmail author
  • Vincent Tse
Post-Prostatectomy and Acquired Voiding Dysfunction (V Tse, Section Editor)
  • 6 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Post-Prostatectomy and Acquired Voiding Dysfunction

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review will explore how lower urinary tract dysfunction may result from pelvic oncological extirpative surgery across multiple disciplines and how to avoid it.

Recent Findings

Minimally invasive colorectal surgery offers superior dexterity, precise movements and improved vision to identify and carefully dissect off neurovascular bundles. This reduces the incidence of postoperative retention and improved subjective and objective urodynamic parameters. Pneumoperitoneum and inappropriate retraction techniques may however still lead to urinary tract dysfunction. Data regarding presacral surgery and its complications is limited. A better understanding of anatomy and modifications to the radical hysterectomy procedure has allowed for improved surgical outcomes and urinary tract function. Cautious dissection of the lateral parametria differentiates the hypogastric plexus (particularly the inferior branch) from vascular structures and ligaments.

Summary

Bladder dysfunction can have a significant impact on a patient’s quality of life. Surgical techniques to preserve important neurovascular structures have been described. Despite this, there is still a high incidence of urinary tract dysfunction. Surgical techniques in the future may be better refined to microscopically dissect off neurovascular bundles; improve assisted neurological monitoring; or enhance super-imposed imaging, to optimise and preserve lower urinary tract function.

Keywords

Bladder dysfunction Voiding dysfunction Pelvic surgery Cancer Colorectal Gynaecology 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    World Health Organisation. Cancer. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Sept [Cited 2019 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organisation. Cancer. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Cited 2019 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/cervical-cancer/en/
  3. 3.
    Chaudhri S, Maruthachalam K, Kaiser A, Robson W, Pickard RS, Horgan AF. Successful voiding after trial without catheter is not synonymous with recovery of bladder function after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(7):1066–70.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0540-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    • Huber SA, Northington GM, Karp DR. Bowel and bladder dysfunction following surgery within the presacral space: an overview of neuroanatomy, function, and dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:941–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2572-x. Effect of presacral surgery on urinary function. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    • Grass F, Slieker J, Frauche P, Sola J, Blanc C, Demartines N, et al. Postoperative urinary retention in colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery pathway. J Surg Res. 2017;2017:70–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.089 Risk factors for acute urinary retention after surgery. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee SY, Kang S, Kim D, Oh H, Ihn MI. Risk factors and preventive measures for acute urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2015;39:275–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2767-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benoist S, Panis Y, Denet C, Mauvais F, Mariani P, Valleur P. Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 1999;125:135e141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    •• Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:637–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70131-5. The COREAN trial showed less urinary dysfunction after laparoscopic vs. open rectal cancer surgery. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    • Kim HO, Kim YSCH, Lee SR, Jung KU, Chun H. Scoring systems used to predict bladder dysfunction after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40:3044–305.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3636-5. Two scoring systems using three risk factors (age, male gender and anastomosis level) may predict postoperative bladder dysfunction. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kwaan MR, Lee JT, Rothenberger DA, Melton GB, Madoff RD. Early removal of urinary catheters after rectal surgery is associated with increased urinary retention. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:401–5.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmidt C, Daun A, Malchow B, Küchler T. Sexual impairment and its effects on quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107:123–30.  https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0123.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moriya Y. Functional preservation in rectal cancer surgery. Int J Clin Oncol. 2006;11:339–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-006-0608-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tekkis PP, Cornish JA, Remzi FH, Tilney HS, Strong SA, Church JM, et al. Measuring sexual and urinary outcomes in women after rectal cancer excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(1):46–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e318197551e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duran E, Tanriseven M, Ersoz N, Oztas M, Ozerhan IH, Kilbas Z, et al. Urinary and sexual dysfunction rates and risk factors following rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:1547–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2346-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Junginger T, Kneist W, Heintz A. Influence of identification and preservation of pelvic autonomic nerves in rectal cancer surgery on bladder dysfunction after total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:621–8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DCR.0000059327.55102.96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    • Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lindegaard JC, Laurberg S. Urinary and sexual dysfunction in women after resection with and without preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Color Dis. 2017;17(1):26–37.  https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12758. Preoperative radiotherapy increases risk of lower urinary tract dysfunction after surgery. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    •• Dar MS, Parray FQ, Bhat AH, Chowdri NA, Wani ML. Impact of total mesorectal excision on bladder and sexual function in rectal cancer. Cancer Surg. 2016;1:110. Comparison of peak flow rates and post void residual volumes pre- and post-surgery. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, et al. Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1614–20.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0909-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(1):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1867-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luca F, Valvo M. Nerve preservation in robotic rectal surgery. In: Obias V, editor. Robotic colon and rectal surgery. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43256-4_14.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    •• Wang G, Wang Z, Jiang Z, Liu J, Zhao J, Li J. Male urinary and sexual function after robotic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2017;13:e1725.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1725. Robotic surgery shows distinct advantages in protecting the pelvic autonomic nerves. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M, Pozzi S, Faso FL, Ravizza D, et al. Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1274–8.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0366-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    •• Panteleimonitis S, Ahmed J, Harper M, Parvaiz A. Critical analysis of the literature investigating urogenital function preservation following robotic rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(11):744–54.  https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v8.i11.744. Systematic review analysing the urogenital functional outcomes of patients receiving robotic rectal cancer surgery. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    •• Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2485–93.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2262-1. Robotic TME associated with better urinary function recovery than laparoscopic TME. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    •• Dulskas A, Miliauskas P, Tikuisis R, Escalante R, Samalavicius NE. The functional results of radical rectal cancer surgery: review of the literature. Acta Chir Belg. 2016;116(1):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2015.1136482. Systematic review reports on urinary tract function after open and minimally invasive surgery. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    • Althumairi AA, Efron JE. Genitourinary considerations in reoperative and complex colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29:145–51.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1580629. Early detection and management of iatrogenic injury can avoid long-term dysfunction. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tewary A, Srivastava A, Sooriakumaran P, et al. Technique of traction-free nerve sparing robotic prostatectomy: delicate tissue handling by real-time penile oxygen monitoring. Int J Impot Res. 2012;24(1):11–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2011.40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lange MM, van de Velde CJ. Urinary and sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment. Nat Rev Urol. 2011;8(1):51–7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    • Moszkowicz D, Alsaid B, Bessede T, Penna C, Nordlinger B, Benoît G, et al. Where does pelvic nerve injury occur during rectal surgery for cancer? Color Dis. 2011;13:1326–34.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02384.x. A review of surgical anatomy. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ. Anatomy of Denonvilliers’ fascia and pelvic nerves, impotence, and implications for the colorectal surgeon. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1288–99.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01542.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Havenga K, DeRuiter MC, Enker WE, Welvaart K. Anatomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1996;83:384–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Heriot AG, Simpson JAD. The iatrogenic complications of pelvic surgery. In: Beynon J, Harris DA, Davies M, Evans M, editors. Coloproctology. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55957-5_6.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ho VP, Lee Y, Stein SL, Temple LK. Sexual function after treatment for rectal cancer: a review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:113–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fb7b82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Daniel IR, Woodward S, Taylor FGM, Raja A, Toomey P. Female urogenital dysfunction following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2006;4:6–9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-4-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Abdelhady MM, Hassouna MM. Voiding dysfunction after pelvic surgery. Clin Colon Rect Surg. 2003;16(1):13–8.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-39033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Delacroix SE Jr, Winters JC. Voiding dysfunction after pelvic colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;23:119–27.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1254299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    •• Kauff DW, Lang H, Kneist W. Risk factor analysis for newly developed urogenital dysfunction after total mesorectal excision and impact of pelvic intraoperative neuromonitoring—a prospective 2-year follow-up study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21:1038–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3409-y. The benefit of intraoperative neuromonitoring to avoid injury. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Song PH, Yun SM, Kim JH, Moon KH. Comparison of the erectile function in male patients with rectal cancer treated by preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery and surgery alone. Int J Color Dis. 2010;25:619–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0879-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    • Qiao Q, Che X, Li X, He S, Qiu G, Lu J, et al. Recovery of urinary functions after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for T4 rectal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg. 2016;26(8):2016.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2015.0479. Assessment of urinary tract function after advanced rectal cancer surgery. Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Eveno C, Lamblin A, Mariette C, Pocard M. Sexual and urinary dysfunction after proctectomy for rectal cancer. J Visc Surg. 2010;147:e21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2010.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kowalczyk KJ, Huang AC, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Yu HY, Ulmer WD, et al. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;60(3):536–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sterk P, Shekarriz B, Günter S, Nolde J, Keller R, Bruch HP, et al. Voiding and sexual dysfunction after deep rectal resection and total mesorectal excision: prospective study on 52 patients. Int J Color Dis. 2005;2005(20):423–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-004-0711-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Woodfield JC, Chalmers AG, Phillips N, Sagar PM. Algorithms for surgical management of retrorectal tumors. Br J Surg. 2008;95:214–21.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chereau N, Lefevre JH, Meurette G, Mourra N, Shields C, Parc Y, et al. Surgical resection of retrorectal tumours in adults: long-term results in 47 patients. Color Dis. 2012;15:e476–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jao SW, Beart RW, Spencer RJ, Reiman HM, Ilstrup DM. Retrorectal tumors: Mayo Clinic experience 1960–1979. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28:644–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ralph G, Winter R, Michelitsch L, Tamussino K. Radicality of parametrial resection and dysfunction of the lower urinary tract after radical hysterectomy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1991;12:27–30.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wit EM, Horenblas S. Urological complications after treatment of cervical cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11(2):110–7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R, Muzii L, Panici PB. Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48(3):287–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Plotti F, Angioli R, Zullo MA, Sansone M, Altavilla T, Antonelli E, et al. Update on urodynamic bladder dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;80:323–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Charoenkwan K, Pranpanas S. Prevalence and characteristics of late postoperative voiding dysfunction in early stage cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007;8(3):387–9.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fujii S. Anatomic identification of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(2 Suppl):S33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Landoni F, Bocciolone L, Perego P, Maneo A, Bratina G, Mangioni C. Cancer of the cervix, FIGO stages IB and IIA: patterns of local growth and paracervical extension. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1995;5:329–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, Perego P, Milani R, Caruso O, et al. Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer:a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:3–12.  https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2000.6010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:297–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70074-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Laterza RM, Sievert K, de Ridder D, Vierhout ME, Haab F, Cardozo L. Bladder function after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:309–15.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Panici PB, Angioli R, Palaia I, Muzii L, Zullo MA, Manci N, et al. Tailoring the parametrectomy in stages IA2-IB1 cervical carcinoma: is it feasible and safe? Gynecol Oncol. 2005;96:792–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.11.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    •• Aue-aungkul A, Kietpeerakool C, Galaal K, Temtanakitpaisan T, Ngamjarus C, Lumbiganon P. Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11:CD012863.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012863. A systematic review looking at postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction. Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rob L, Halaska M, Robova H. Nerve-sparing and individually tailored surgery for cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:292–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70191-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Hanozet F, Martinelli F, Solima E, Zanaboni F, et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: evolution of concepts. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107(1Suppl 1):S119–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Benson J, Walters M. Neurophysiology and pharmacology of the lower urinary tract. In: Walters M, Karram M, editors. Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    • Manchana T, Prasartsakulchai C, Santingamkun A. Long-term lower urinary tract dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in patients with early postoperative voiding dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:95–101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0996-5. Altered long-term urodynamic parameters in patients who had early post hysterectomy urinary tract dysfunction. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Chuang TY, Yu KJ, Penn IW, Chang YC, Lin PH, Tsai YA. Neurourological changes before and after radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:954–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Chen GD, Lin LY, Wang PH, Lee HS. Urinary tract dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85:292–7.  https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2002.6614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Benedetti-Panici P, Zullo MA, Plotti F, Manci N, Muzii L, Angioli R. Long-term bladder function in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and type 3–4 radical hysterectomy. Cancer. 2004;100:2110–7.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    • Zhou W, Yang X, Dai Y, Wu Q, He G, Yin G. Survey of cervical cancer survivors regarding quality of life and sexual function. J Cancer Res Ther. 2016;12(2):938–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.11.018. Treatment-related complications significantly affect patients’ quality of life after radical hysterectomy. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    • Aoun F, van Velthoven R. Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:947–57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2574-8. A review showing that nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy reduces lower urinary tract dysfunction. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie University School of Health SciencesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations