English phonological specificity predicts early French reading difficulty in emerging bilingual children
The purpose of the present study was to examine the predictive value of a dynamic test of English and French lexical specificity on at-risk reading classification in 13 at-risk and 44 not at-risk emerging English (L1)–French (L2) bilingual Grade 1 children (M = 75.87 months, SD = 3.18) enrolled in an early French immersion program in Canada. Lexical specificity was assessed with a computerized word learning game in which children were taught new English (e.g., “foal” and “sole”) and French (e.g., bac “bin” and bague “ring”) word pairs contrasted by minimal phonological differences. The results indicated that the dynamic test of lexical specificity in English contributed significantly to the prediction of children’s French at-risk reading status at the end of Grade 1 after controlling for French phonological awareness and nonverbal reasoning skills. However, French lexical specificity did not predict children’s reading risk classification in French after controlling for French phonological awareness. Thus, it may be feasible to identify at-risk status in emerging bilinguals using dynamic measures in their stronger language.
KeywordsDynamic assessment Early identification French immersion Lexical specificity Linguistic transfer Phonological awareness Reading disabilities
A special thanks to Dr. Jeffrey Steele, Dr. Eliane Segers, Dr. Ludo Verhoeven, Sharry Shakory, and Alexandra Bellissimo for their invaluable guidance and support throughout the project. This research would not have been possible without the support of the teachers, parents, and children at our partner schools, in addition to all of the research assistants of the Multilingualism and Literacy Lab.
This research was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Insight Development Grant No. 430-2015-00786 (to X.C.).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Au-Yeung, K., Hipfner-Boucher, K., Chen, X., Pasquarella, A., D'Angelo, N., & Deacon, H. (2015). Development of English and French language and literacy skills in EL1 and EL French immersion students in the early grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Catts, H. W., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Bridges, M. S., & Mendoza, K. (2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cho, E., Compton, D. L., Gilbert, J. K., Steacy, L. M., Collins, A. A., & Lindström, E. R. (2017). Development of first-graders’ word reading skills: For whom can dynamic assessment tell us more? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415599343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles: National Dissemination and Assessment Center.Google Scholar
- E-Prime (2012) (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology software tools.Google Scholar
- Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Bouton, B., & Caffrey, E. (2011). The construct and predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of young children learning to read: Implications for RTI frameworks. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411407864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gellert, A. S., & Elbro, C. (2018). Predicting reading disabilities using dynamic assessment of decoding before and after the onset of reading instruction: A longitudinal study from kindergarten through grade 2. Annals of Dyslexia, 68, 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-0159-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B. (1993). Linguistic and cognitive correlates of academic skills in first and second languages. Language Learning, 43, 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00171.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Geva, E., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Schuster, B. (2000). Understanding individual differences in word recognition skills and ESL children. Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 123–154 Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-000-0020-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gottardo, A., Collins, P., Baciu, I., & Gebotys, R. (2008). Predictors of grade 2 word reading, listening comprehension and reading comprehension from grade 1 variables in Spanish-speaking children: Similarities and differences. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 23, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00259.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, R. K., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (1997). Immersion education: International perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Krenca, K., Segers, E., Chen, X., Shakory, S., Steele, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). Phonological specificity relates to phonological awareness and reading ability in English-French bilingual children. Reading and Writing an Interdisciplinary Journal 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09959-2
- Lidz, C. S., & Elliott, J. (Eds.). (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. New York: Jai.Google Scholar
- Lovett, M. W., Palma, M. D., Frijters, J., Steinbach, K., Temple, M., Benson, N., & Lacerenza, L. (2008). Interventions for reading difficulties: A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408317859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lu, Y. Y., & Hu, C. F. (2018). Dynamic assessment of phonological awareness in young foreign language learners: Predictability and modifiability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1–18 Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11145-018-9894-x.
- Manis, F. R., & Lindsey, K. A. (2010). Cognitive and oral language contributors to reading disabilities in Spanish-English bilinguals. In A. Y. Durgunoglu & C. Goldenberg (Eds.), Language and literacy development in bilingual settings.Google Scholar
- Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89–120). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix Analogies Test—Short Form. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Ortéga, É., & Lété, B. (2010). eManulex: Electronic version of Manulex and Manulex-infra databases. Retrieved from http://www.manulex.org
- Petersen, D. B., Allen, M. M., & Spencer, T. D. (2016). Predicting reading difficulty in first grade using dynamic assessment of decoding in early kindergarten: A large-scale longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414538518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin: PRO-ED Publishing, Inc..Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. A. (2013). CTOPP-2: Comprehensive test of phonological processing (2nd ed.). Austin: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
- Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar