Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp 114–135 | Cite as

Theory and reported practice in EFL literacy instruction: EFL teachers’ perceptions about classroom practices

  • Stephanie FuchsEmail author
  • Janina Kahn-Horwitz
  • Tami Katzir


Acquiring literacy in English as a foreign language (EFL) is important for language development. However, many students enter middle school without adequate EFL literacy skills. This may indicate a gap between EFL literacy instruction theory and the classroom practice that is occurring in elementary school classrooms. The aim of this study was to explore the components of EFL literacy instruction as perceived by teachers. The study investigated whether perceptions of classroom practices are theoretically based, thus shedding light on the gap between EFL literacy theory and practice. The participants were 167 EFL elementary school teachers, who submitted anonymous online questionnaires regarding their reported EFL teaching in year one, two, three, four, and five of elementary school. The research was based on the five pillars of literacy instruction for English as a first language (National Reading Panel, 2000) and additional EFL components (August & Shanahan, 2006). Results of this study showed that EFL teachers expressed views that may indicate a gap between teachers’ practices and most cutting-edge research. The study concluded that providing EFL elementary school teachers with theoretical knowledge may lead to more productive literacy programs and may improve classroom practices.


English as a foreign language (EFL) Literacy instruction Teacher perceptions Theoretically based instruction 



  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Aronin, L., & Spolsky, B. (2010). Research in English language teaching and learning in Israel (2004–2009). Language Teaching, 43(3), 297–319. Scholar
  3. August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Executive summary: developing literacy in second-language learners: report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. August, D., McCardle, P., & Shanahan, T. (2014). Developing literacy in English language learners: findings from a review of the experimental research. School Psychology Review, 43(4), 490–498.Google Scholar
  5. Begeny, J. C., Ross, S. G., Greene, D. J., Mitchell, R. C., & Whitehouse, M. H. (2012). Effects of the helping early literacy with practice strategies (HELPS) reading fluency program with Latino English language learners: a preliminary evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21(2), 134–149. Scholar
  6. Blaz, D. (2006). Differentiated instruction: a guide for foreign language teachers (pp. 109–122). NY: Eye on Education.Google Scholar
  7. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: a review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. Scholar
  8. Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S., Podhajski, B., & Chard, D. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51(1), 97–120.Google Scholar
  9. Brady, S., & Moats, L. (1997). Informed instruction for reading success: foundations for teacher preparation. A position paper of the international dyslexia association. Baltimore: International Dyslexia Association.Google Scholar
  10. Brusnighan, S. M., & Folk, J. R. (2012). Combining contextual and morphemic cues is beneficial during incidental vocabulary acquisition: semantic transparency in novel compound word processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(2), 172–190. Scholar
  11. Carreker, S., & Birsh, J. R. (2005). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills. Activity book (pp. 18–24). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  12. Carver, R. P. (1998). Predicting reading level in grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: testing theory relevant to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 10(2), 121–154.Google Scholar
  13. Cassidy, J., Valadez, C. M., & Garrett, S. D. (2010). Literacy trends and issues: a look at the five pillars and the cement that supports them. The Reading Teacher, 63(8), 644–655. Scholar
  14. Crosson, A., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers’ text-reading fluency in English. Reading and Writing, 23, 475–494. Scholar
  15. Cunningham, A. E., Zibulsky, J., Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2009). How teachers would spend their time teaching language arts: the mismatch between self-reported and best practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 418–430. Scholar
  16. Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: construction, administration and processing. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Ediger, A. M. (2014). Teaching second/foreign language literacy to school-age learners. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed., pp. 154–188). Boston: National Geographic Learning.Google Scholar
  18. Ellis, R. (2001). The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign language curriculum. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 17–34). NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: an SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 83–107.Google Scholar
  20. Ferguson, G., & Donno, S. (2003). One-month teacher training courses: time for a change? ELT Journal, 57(1), 26–33.Google Scholar
  21. Fuchs, S. (2017). Relationships between theory and practice in EFL literacy instruction in Israel: teachers’ and experts’ perceptions about classroom practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Haifa University.Google Scholar
  22. Georgiou, G. K., Das, J. P., & Hayward, D. (2009). Revisiting the “Simple View of Reading” in a group of children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 76–84. Scholar
  23. Geva, E., & Wang, M. (2001). The development of basic reading skills in children: a cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 182–204.Google Scholar
  24. Geva, E. (2006). Second-language oral proficiency and second-language literacy. Developing literacy in second-language learners: report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth, 123–140.Google Scholar
  25. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.Google Scholar
  26. Grabe, W. (2009a). How reading works: the building blocks of fluency and comprehension. In Reading in a second language: moving from theory to practice (pp. 21–38). NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Grabe, W. (2009b). Reading fluency, reading rate and comprehension. In Reading in a second language: moving from theory to practice (pp. 289–310). NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grabe, W. (2009c). Developing reading comprehension abilities. In Reading in a second language: moving from theory to practice (pp. 195–219). NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing, 27, 1703–1743. Scholar
  30. Hersch, J., & Andrews, S. (2012). Lexical quality and reading skill: bottom-up and top-down contributions to sentence processing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(3), 240–262.Google Scholar
  31. Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 23.Google Scholar
  32. Joshi, R. M., Binks, E., Hougen, M., Dahlgren, M. E., Oker-Dean, E., & Smith, D. L. (2009). Why elementary teachers might be inadequately prepared to teach reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 392–402.Google Scholar
  33. Joshi, R. M., Washburn, E. K., & Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2016). Introduction to the special issue on teacher knowledge from an international perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(1), 1–6. Scholar
  34. Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2015). ‘Organizing the mess in my mind’: EFL teachers’ perceptions and knowledge of English orthography. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 611–631. Scholar
  35. Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2016). Providing English foreign language teachers with content knowledge to facilitate decoding and spelling acquisition: a longitudinal perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(1), 147–170. Scholar
  36. Kahn-Horwitz, J., Shimron, J., & Sparks, R. (2005). Predicting foreign language reading achievement in elementary school students. Reading and Writing, 18, 527–558. Scholar
  37. Kahn-Horwitz, J., Sparks, R. L., & Goldstein, Z. (2011). English as a foreign language spelling development: a longitudinal study. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 1–21.
  38. Katzir, T., Kim, Y., Wolf, M., O'Brien, B., Kenney, B., Lovett, M., & Morris, R. (2006). Reading fluency: the whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56(1), 51–82.Google Scholar
  39. Kim, J. S., Capotosto, L., Hartry, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2011). Can a mixed-method literacy intervention improve the reading achievement of low-performing elementary school students in an after-school program? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 183–201. Scholar
  40. Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. (2012). The development of reading comprehension skills in children learning English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 25, 1873–1898. Scholar
  41. Moats, L. C. (2000). Speech to print: language essentials for teachers. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  42. Moats, L. (2014). What teachers do not know and why they aren’t learning it: addressing the need for content and pedagogy in teacher education. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 19, 75–92. Scholar
  43. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Report of the subgroups: National Reading Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health.Google Scholar
  44. Olshtain, E. (2014). Practical tasks for mastering the mechanics of writing and going just beyond. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed., pp. 208–221). Boston: National Geographic Learning.Google Scholar
  45. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. Precursors of Functional Literacy, 11, 67–86.Google Scholar
  46. Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. Scholar
  47. Piasta, S. B., McDonald Connor, C., Fishman, B. J., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 224–248.Google Scholar
  48. Primor, L., Pierce, M. E., & Katzir, T. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts among Hebrew-speaking readers with and without a reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 61, 242–268. Scholar
  49. Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS). (2006) Teacher questionnaire. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
  50. Quirk, M., & Beem, S. (2012). Examining the relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension for English language learners. Psychology in the Schools, 49(6), 539–553. Scholar
  51. Rasinski, T. V. (2012). Why reading fluency should be hot. The Reading Teacher, 65(8), 516–522. Scholar
  52. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31–74.Google Scholar
  53. Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2010). Acquiring reading in two languages: an introduction to the special issue. Reading and Writing, 23, 263–267.Google Scholar
  54. Samuels, S. J (2002). Reading fluency: its development and assessment. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds), What research has to say about reading instruction 3rd edition (pp. 166-181). International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  55. Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43.Google Scholar
  56. Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174.Google Scholar
  57. Shankweiler, D., & Fowler, A. E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing, 17, 483–515.Google Scholar
  58. Solis, M., Ciullo, S., Vaughn, S., Pyle, N., Hassaram, B., & Leroux, A. (2012). Reading comprehension interventions for middle school students with learning disabilities: a synthesis of 30 years of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(4), 327–340. Scholar
  59. Spear-Swerling, L., & Zibulsky, J. (2014). Making time for literacy: teacher knowledge and time allocation in instructional planning. Reading and Writing, 27(8), 1353–1378.Google Scholar
  60. State of Israel Ministry of Education in Israel. (2015). MATANA document, page 124. Retrieved July 18, 2016, from:
  61. Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2014). Theories. In How children learn to write words (pp. 84–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Ur, P. (2011). Grammar teaching. In Hinkel, E. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Volume II, 507–522. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Ur, P. (2012). A course in English language teaching (pp. 60-75, 76-87, 101-116, 117-132, 133-146, 150-166). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (2001). Emergent literacy skills, early instruction, and individual differences as determinants of difficulties in learning to read: the case for early intervention. Handbook of Early Literacy Research, 1, 295–321.Google Scholar
  65. Washburn, E. K., Binks-Cantrell, E. S., Joshi, R. M., Martin-Chang, S., & Arrow, A. (2016). Preservice teacher knowledge of basic language constructs in Canada, England, New Zealand, and the USA. Annals of Dyslexia, 66, 7–26. Scholar
  66. Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–239.Google Scholar
  67. Zeltsman-Kulick, R. (2015). English reading comprehension of adolescent Hebrew speakers learning English as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Haifa University.Google Scholar
  68. Zhao, J., Joshi, R. M., Dixon, L. Q., & Huang, L. (2016). Chinese EFL teachers’ knowledge of basic language constructs and their self-perceived teaching abilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 66, 127–146. Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Dyslexia Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Fuchs
    • 1
    Email author
  • Janina Kahn-Horwitz
    • 2
  • Tami Katzir
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Learning DisabilitiesUniversity of Haifa Gordon College of EducationHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Oranim College of EducationKiryat Tiv’onIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Learning DisabilitiesUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations