Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Aspergillus spp. burden on filtering respiratory protective devices. Is there an occupational health concern?

  • 32 Accesses

Abstract

There is scientific evidence that associates occupational exposure to fungi in the waste industry to health outcomes, being Aspergillus genera reported as the most prevalent. During Filtering Respiratory Protective Devices (FFR) use, humidity and temperature conditions provide favorable conditions for Aspergillus growth. The aim of this study was to characterize Aspergillus burden retained by FFR interior layer and exhalation valve. The sample consisted of 120 FFR and the correspondent interior layer and exhalation valves collected from different workstations from one waste sorting industry. The fungal content of exhalation valve and from the interior layer of the each FFR was extracted and inoculated on malt extract agar (MEA) supplemented with chloramphenicol (0.05%) and dichloran-glycerol agar (DG18). FFR extracts were also used for the molecular detection of Aspergillus sections Flavi and Fumigati. Valves presented Aspergillus spp. as the most prevalent genera on MEA media (44.4%), unlike what was observed in the FFR interior layer, where Aspergillus spp. was not the most prevalent genera (6.84% MEA; 5.2% DG18). Among the Aspergillus genera, section Fumigati was the one with highest prevalence, both in exhalation valves (76.57% MEA; 87.24% DG18) and interior layer (75.81% MEA; 51.22% DG18). qPCR analysis successfully amplified DNA from the Aspergillus sections Flavi and Fumigati. Interior layers presented statistically significant differences showing higher number of FFR contaminated with higher levels of Aspergillus in the workstations where workers contact directly with waste. This work, revealing strong fungal contamination of FFR used by workers at waste industry, clearly indicates that future trials to test FFR protective efficacy and establishment of times for FFR replacement should be performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data availability

The authors have full control of all primary data and permission is given to the journal to review the data if requested.

References

  1. Bergwall C, Stehn B (2002) Comparison of selective mycological agar media for the isolation and enumeration of xerophilic moulds and osmotolerant yeasts in granulated white sugar. Zuckerindustrie: 259-264

  2. Carducci A, Donzelli G, Cioni L, Verani M (2016) Quantitative microbial risk assessment in occupational settings applied to the airborne human adenovirus infection. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20 13(7):733

  3. Degois J, Clerc F, Simon X, Bontemps C, Leblond P, Duquenne F (2017) First metagenomic survey of the microbial diversity in bioaerosols emitted in waste sorting plants. Ann Work expo Health:1–11

  4. De Hoog D, Guarro J, Gene G, Figueras M (2016) Atlas of clinical Fungi – the ultimate benchtool for diagnosis, version 4.1.4. Utr. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures

  5. Directive 2000/54/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council of 18 September 2000 on the Protection of Workers From Risks Related to Exposure to Biological Agents at Work

  6. Domingo J, Nadal M (2009) Domestic waste composting facilities: a review of human health risks. Environ Int 35:382–389

  7. Fairlamb A, Gow N, Matthews K, Waters A (2016) Drug resistance in eukaryotic microorganisms. Nat Microbiol:24–27

  8. Gangneux J (2017) Environmental fungal risk in health facilities. In: exposure to microbiological agents in indoor and occupational environments: 303-319

  9. Heikkilä P, Kotimaa M, Tuomi T, Salmi T (1988) Identification and counting of fungal spores by scanning electron microscope. Ann Occup Hyg:1–4

  10. Heitman J (2011) Microbial pathogens in the fungal kingdom. Fungal biol Rev:1–3

  11. Hope W, Walsh T, Denning D (2005) The invasive and saprophytic syndromes due to Aspergillus spp. Med Mycol 43:207–238

  12. Hwang SH, Cho JH (2016) Evaluation of airborne fungi and the effects of a platform screen door and station depth in 25 underground subway stations in Seoul. South Korea Air Qual Atmos Health 9:561–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-015-0361-4

  13. Jankowska E, Reponen T, Willeke K, Grinshpun S, Choi K-J (2000) Collection of fungal spores on air filters and spore reentrainment from filters into air. J Aerosol Sci 31(8):969–978

  14. Latgé J (1999) Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 4:382–389

  15. Lewis R, Wiederhold N, Lionakis M, Prince R, Kontoyiannis D (2005) Frequency and species distribution of Gliotoxin-producing Aspergillus isolates recovered from patients at a tertiary-care Cancer center. J Clin Microbiol:1–12

  16. Majchrzycka K, Okrasa M, Skóra J, Gutarowska B (2016) Evaluation of the survivability of microorganisms deposited on filtering respiratory protective devices under varying conditions of humidity. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:98. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010098

  17. Maus R, Goppelsröder A (2001) Umhauer, H. survival of bacterial and mold spores in air filter media. Atmos Environ 35(1):105–113

  18. McCormick A, Loeffler J, Ebel F (2010) Aspergillus fumigatus: contours of an opportunistic human pathogen. Cell Microbiol 12(11):1535–1543

  19. McDevitt JJ, Lees PSJ, Merz WG, Schwab KJ (2007) Inhibition of quantitative PCR analysis of fungal conidia associated with indoor air particulate matter. Aerobiologia 23:35–45

  20. Meletiadis J, Roilides E (2013) Rare invasive fungal infections: epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Curr Fungal Infect Rep:23–12

  21. Nature Microbiology (2017) Stop neglecting fungi. Nat Microbiol 25:8

  22. Peterson S, Varga J, Frisvad J, Samson R (2008) Phylogeny and subgeneric taxonomy of Aspergillus. In Aspergillus in the Genomic Era Wageningen Academic Publishers: 33–56

  23. Pringle A, Baker D, Platt J, Wares J, Latgé J, Taylor J (2005) Cryptic speciation in the cosmopolitan and clonal human pathogenic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Evolution 59(9):1886–1899

  24. Ramos C, Martínez S, Olivares R (2002) Gliotoxin production in 10 strains of Aspergillus fumigatus isolated from clinical cases. Revista Técnica Pecuaria en México 40(2):139–148

  25. Seyedmousavi S, Guillot J, Arné P, de Hoog, G, Mouton J, Melchers W. et al. (2015) Aspergillus and aspergilloses in wild and domestic animals: a global health concern with parallels to human disease. Med Mycol. 53(8):765–797

  26. Stanzani M (2005) Aspergillus fumigatus suppresses the human cellular immune response via gliotoxin-mediated apoptosis of monocytes. Blood:15–13

  27. Varga J, Baranyi N, Chandrasekaran M, Vágvölgyi C, Kocsubé S (2015) Mycotoxin producers in the Aspergillus genus: an update. Acta Biologica Szegediensis

  28. Vermeulen E, Maertens J, De Bel A, Nulens E, Boelens J, Surmont I et al (2015) Nationwide surveillance of azole resistance in Aspergillus diseases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59(8):4569–4576

  29. Viegas C, Almeida B, Gomes A, Carolino E, Caetano L (2019a) Aspergillus spp. prevalence in primary health care centres: assessment by a novel multi-approach sampling protocol. Environ Res 8(175):133–141

  30. Viegas C, Faria T, Caetano L, Carolino E, Gomes A, Viegas S (2017) Aspergillus spp. prevalence in different Portuguese occupational environments: what is the real scenario in high load settings. J Occup Environ Hyg:3–10

  31. Viegas C, Faria T, Meneses M, Carolino E, Viegas S, Gomes A et al (2016) Analysis of surfaces for characterization of fungal burden – does it matter. Int J Occup Med Environ Health:12–15

  32. Viegas C, Monteiro A, Caetano L, Faria T, Carolino E, Viegas S (2018) Electrostatic dust cloth: a passive screening method to assess occupational exposure to organic dust in bakeries. Atmosphere (Basel) 12(5):573–583

  33. Viegas C, Santos P, Almeida B, Monteiro A, Carolino E, Quintal Gomes A, Viegas S (2019b) Electrostatic dust collector: a passive screening method to assess occupational exposure to organic dust in primary health care centers. Air Qual Atmos Health 12:573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0650-9

  34. Viegas S, Veiga L, Figueiredo P, Almeida A, Carolino E, Viegas C (2015) Assessment of Workers' exposure to Aflatoxin B1 in a Portuguese waste industry. Ann Occup Hyg 59(2):173–181

  35. Yang S, Rothman RE (2004) PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. Lancet Infect Dis 4:337–348

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by FCT (Fundação para Ciência e Tecnologia) for funding the project EXPOs, establishing protocols to assess occupational exposure to microbiota in clinical settings (02/SAICT/2016 – Project n° 23222), and Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, for funding the Project “Waste Workers’ Exposure to Bioburden through Filtering Respiratory Protective Devices” (IPL/2018/WasteFRPD_ESTeSL).

Author information

Correspondence to Carla Viegas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viegas, C., Dias, M., Almeida, B. et al. Aspergillus spp. burden on filtering respiratory protective devices. Is there an occupational health concern?. Air Qual Atmos Health 13, 187–196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00781-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Aspergillus spp.
  • Filtering Respiratory Protective Devices
  • Aspergillus section Fumigati
  • Aspergillus section Flavi