Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 12, Issue 12, pp 1399–1404 | Cite as

Exposures and effects from fragranced consumer products in Germany

  • Anne SteinemannEmail author
  • Ursula Klaschka
Article

Abstract

Fragranced consumer products—such as cleaning supplies, laundry products, perfumes, and air fresheners—have been associated with adverse human health effects and subsequent impacts in society. This study investigates effects associated with exposures to fragranced consumer products in Germany. Using a nationally representative population-based sample (n = 1102), data were collected in March 2019 using an online survey of adults in Germany. The study found that, across the German population, 19.9% report health problems, such as respiratory problems (55.3%), migraine headaches (25.1%), and asthma attacks (16.9%), when exposed to fragranced products. Of these reports of health effects, 33.8% could be considered potentially disabling. Further, 5.5% of the population have lost workdays or a job, in the past year, due to exposure to fragranced products in the workplace. A majority of Germans would prefer that workplaces, health care facilities and professionals, airplanes, and hotels were fragrance-free rather than fragranced. Results from this study provide new evidence that exposures to fragranced consumer products are associated with adverse health and societal effects among the German population, and that reducing exposures such as through fragrance-free policies could provide benefits.

Keywords

Fragranced consumer product Fragrance Fragrance-free policy Health effects 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of Dynata (formerly Survey Sampling International) for their superb work. We also thank Nigel Goodman, Neda Nematollahi, and the anonymous referees for their thoughtful reviews of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

11869_2019_770_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (51 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 50 kb)
11869_2019_770_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (102 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 101 kb)
11869_2019_770_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (2.2 mb)
ESM 3 (PDF 2273 kb)

References

  1. Diepgen TL, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, Bertuccio P, Cazzaniga S, Coenraad, P-J, Elsner P, Goncalo M, Svensson A, Naldi L 2016. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol 174(2):319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J, Frosch PJ, Uter W 2004. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK. Dermatitis 50(2):65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. SGB (Sozialgesetzbuch) 2017. § 2 SGB IX (1); Rehabilitation und Teilhabe behinderter Menschen; Behinderung [Disability] 29.3.2017Google Scholar
  4. Steinemann A 2019b. International prevalence of fragrance sensitivity, air quality, atmosphere and health (01 Jun)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Steinemann A 2019a. Ten questions concerning fragrance-free policies and indoor built environments, building and environment (03 Apr)Google Scholar
  6. Steinemann A (2018b) Exposures and effects from fragranced consumer products in Sweden. Air Qual Atmos Health 11(5):485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Steinemann A (2018a) Fragranced consumer products: sources of emissions, exposures, and health effects in the United Kingdom. Air Qual Atmos Health 11(3):253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Steinemann A (2017) Health and societal effects from fragranced consumer products. Prev Med Rep 5:45–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Steinemann A (2016) Fragranced consumer products: exposures and effects from emissions. Air Qual Atmos Health 9(8):861–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Steinemann A (2015) Volatile emissions from common consumer products. Air Qual Atmos Health 8(3):273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O (2001) Association between occupation and contact allergy to the fragrance mix: a multifactorial analysis of national surveillance data. Occup. Environ. Med 58(6):392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Infrastructure Engineering, School of EngineeringThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  3. 3.University of Applied SciencesUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations