Fragranced consumer products—such as cleaning supplies, laundry products, perfumes, and air fresheners—have been associated with adverse human health effects and subsequent impacts in society. This study investigates effects associated with exposures to fragranced consumer products in Germany. Using a nationally representative population-based sample (n = 1102), data were collected in March 2019 using an online survey of adults in Germany. The study found that, across the German population, 19.9% report health problems, such as respiratory problems (55.3%), migraine headaches (25.1%), and asthma attacks (16.9%), when exposed to fragranced products. Of these reports of health effects, 33.8% could be considered potentially disabling. Further, 5.5% of the population have lost workdays or a job, in the past year, due to exposure to fragranced products in the workplace. A majority of Germans would prefer that workplaces, health care facilities and professionals, airplanes, and hotels were fragrance-free rather than fragranced. Results from this study provide new evidence that exposures to fragranced consumer products are associated with adverse health and societal effects among the German population, and that reducing exposures such as through fragrance-free policies could provide benefits.
Fragranced consumer product Fragrance Fragrance-free policy Health effects
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank the staff of Dynata (formerly Survey Sampling International) for their superb work. We also thank Nigel Goodman, Neda Nematollahi, and the anonymous referees for their thoughtful reviews of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Diepgen TL, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, Bertuccio P, Cazzaniga S, Coenraad, P-J, Elsner P, Goncalo M, Svensson A, Naldi L 2016. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol 174(2):319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J, Frosch PJ, Uter W 2004. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK. Dermatitis 50(2):65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SGB (Sozialgesetzbuch) 2017. § 2 SGB IX (1); Rehabilitation und Teilhabe behinderter Menschen; Behinderung [Disability] 29.3.2017Google Scholar
Steinemann A 2019b. International prevalence of fragrance sensitivity, air quality, atmosphere and health (01 Jun)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinemann A 2019a. Ten questions concerning fragrance-free policies and indoor built environments, building and environment (03 Apr)Google Scholar
Steinemann A (2018b) Exposures and effects from fragranced consumer products in Sweden. Air Qual Atmos Health 11(5):485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinemann A (2018a) Fragranced consumer products: sources of emissions, exposures, and health effects in the United Kingdom. Air Qual Atmos Health 11(3):253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinemann A (2017) Health and societal effects from fragranced consumer products. Prev Med Rep 5:45–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinemann A (2016) Fragranced consumer products: exposures and effects from emissions. Air Qual Atmos Health 9(8):861–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinemann A (2015) Volatile emissions from common consumer products. Air Qual Atmos Health 8(3):273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O (2001) Association between occupation and contact allergy to the fragrance mix: a multifactorial analysis of national surveillance data. Occup. Environ. Med 58(6):392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar