Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 12, Issue 11, pp 1259–1265 | Cite as

Volatile chemical emissions from 134 common consumer products

  • Neda NematollahiEmail author
  • Spas D. Kolev
  • Anne Steinemann
Article
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

Emissions from everyday consumer products have been associated with adverse effects on air quality and health. This study investigates volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from 134 common consumer products, both fragranced and fragrance-free, including those with claims of green. Product types include personal care products, air fresheners, cleaning supplies, laundry products, and sunscreens. Using GC/MS headspace analysis, this study found 1538 VOC occurrences (individual ingredients), representing 338 VOC identities (different compounds), emitted from the 134 consumer products. Among the 1538 VOCs, 517 VOCs are classified as potentially hazardous. The most common VOC emitted from the 104 fragranced products was limonene, which was absent in fragrance-free versions. Comparing the green and regular fragranced products, no significant difference was found between the most prevalent potentially hazardous VOCs. Among all volatile ingredients emitted, fewer than 4% were listed on product labels. This study provides extensive findings on volatile emissions from consumer products, which can improve awareness of potential exposures and effects on air quality and health.

Keywords

Consumer products Volatile organic compounds Fragrance Cleaning products Air fresheners Emissions Ingredients 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study received support from the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship (RTP), through the University of Melbourne; the Australian Department of Education and Training (Australian Postgraduate Award); and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).

Supplementary material

11869_2019_754_MOESM1_ESM.docx (79 kb)
ESM 1 Supplementary Table 1: VOC identities and prevalences among all products (n=134). Supplementary Table 2: VOC identities and prevalences among all fragranced products (n=104). Supplementary Table 3: VOC identities and prevalences among all regular and green personal care products (n=50). Supplementary Table 4: VOC identities and prevalences among all regular and green air fresheners (n=12). Supplementary Table 5: VOC identities and prevalences among all regular and green cleaning supplies (n=22). Supplementary Table 6: VOC identities and prevalences among all regular and green laundry products (n=20). Supplementary Table 7: VOC identities and prevalences among all regular and green sunscreens (n=15). Supplementary Table 8: VOC identities and prevalences among all regular and green fragrance-free products (n=15) (DOCX 79 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM2_ESM.doc (336 kb)
Supplementary Table 9 VOC occurrences among regular personal care products (DOC 336 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM3_ESM.doc (294 kb)
Supplementary Table 10 VOC occurrences among green personal care products (DOC 294 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM4_ESM.doc (135 kb)
Supplementary Table 11 VOC occurrences among regular air fresheners (DOC 135 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM5_ESM.doc (140 kb)
Supplementary Table 12 VOC occurrences among green air fresheners (DOC 139 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM6_ESM.doc (177 kb)
Supplementary Table 13 VOC occurrences among regular cleaning supplies (DOC 177 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM7_ESM.doc (157 kb)
Supplementary Table 14 VOC occurrences among green cleaning supplies (DOC 157 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM8_ESM.doc (189 kb)
Supplementary Table 15 VOC occurrences among regular laundry products (DOC 189 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM9_ESM.doc (175 kb)
Supplementary Table 16 VOC occurrences among green laundry products (DOC 175 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM10_ESM.doc (105 kb)
Supplementary Table 17 VOC occurrences among regular and green sunscreens (DOC 105 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM11_ESM.doc (87 kb)
Supplementary Table 18 VOC occurrences among regular and green fragrance-free products (DOC 87 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM12_ESM.docx (36 kb)
Supplementary Table 19 Potentially hazardous compounds among all 134 products (DOCX 35 kb)
11869_2019_754_MOESM13_ESM.docx (36 kb)
Supplementary Table 20 Potentially hazardous compounds among all 104 fragranced products (DOCX 35 kb)

References

  1. Jo WK, Lee JH, Kim MK (2008) Head-space, small-chamber and in-vehicle tests for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from air fresheners for the Korean market. Chemosphere 70:1827–1834.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.08.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kwon KD, Jo WK (2007) Indoor emission characteristics of liquid household products using purge - and - trap method. Environ Eng Res 12:203–210.  https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2007.12.5.203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kwon KD, Jo WK, Lim HJ, Jeong WS (2007) Characterization of emissions composition for selected household products available in Korea. J Hazard Mater 148:192–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lunny S, Nelson R, Steinemann A (2017) Something in the air but not on the label: a call for increased regulatory ingredient disclosure for fragranced consumer products. UNSWLJ 40:1366–1391Google Scholar
  5. McDonald BC, De Gouw JA, Gilman JB, Jathar SH, Akherati A, Cappa CD, Jimenez JL, Lee-Taylor J, Hayes PL, McKeen SA, Cui YY (2018) Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions. Science 359:760–764.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nematollahi N, Doronila A, Mornane PJ, Duan A, Kolev SD, Steinemann A (2018a) Volatile chemical emissions from fragranced baby products. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:785–790.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0593-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nematollahi N, Kolev SD, Steinemann A (2018b) Volatile chemical emissions from essential oils. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:949–954.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0606-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Safe Work Australia (SWA), Hazardous Chemical Information System (HCIS): Search Hazardous Chemicals, http://hcis.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/HazardousChemical. Accessed June 2019)
  9. Stein SE (2008) NIST Standard Reference Database 1A. In: The National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST. pp 1–49Google Scholar
  10. Steinemann A (2009) Fragranced consumer products and undisclosed ingredients. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29:32–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Steinemann A (2015) Volatile emissions from common consumer products. Air Qual Atmos Health 8:273–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-015-0327-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Steinemann A (2019a) International prevalence of fragrance sensitivity. Air Qual Atmos Health (01 Jun)Google Scholar
  13. Steinemann A (2019b) Ten questions concerning fragrance-free policies and indoor built environments. Build Environ (03 Apr)Google Scholar
  14. Uhde E, Schulz N (2015) Impact of room fragrance products on indoor air quality. Atmos Environ 106:492–502.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. World Health Organization (WHO), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, list of classifications, volumes 1–120, http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. Accessed June 2019
  16. Zarogianni AM, Loupa G, Rapsomanikis S (2017) A comparison of fragrance ingredients in green and nongreen detergents. Environ Forensic 18:110–121.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2016.1263902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Melbourne School of EngineeringThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of ChemistryThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations