Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 12, Issue 9, pp 1091–1102 | Cite as

A conceptual model to understand the soluble and insoluble Cr species in deliquesced particles

  • Dinara Konakbayeva
  • Enoch Kwasi Adotey
  • Mehdi Amouei TorkmahallehEmail author
  • Marios M. Fyrillas
  • Altyngul Zinetullina
  • Ana M. Rule
  • Philip K. Hopke
Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Trivalent chromium is a trace nutrient essential to human beings while hexavalent chromium is a known carcinogen and was among the 18 core hazardous air pollutants defined in 2004 by the US EPA. A new conceptual model of Cr speciation in deliquesced particles (pH 4) has been developed. The model provides new information on the soluble and insoluble forms of Cr in atmospheric PM. The dominant form of Cr(VI) in the solution was found to be Cr2O72−. CrO42− was produced by the dissolution of Na2CrO4(s) and K2CrO4(s) available in the solid core, but a considerable portion of the CrO42− precipitated as (NH4)2CrO4(s), CaCrO4(s), BaCrO4(s), and PbCrO4(s). Cr(OH)3 was found to be soluble, and the insoluble form of Cr(III) was Cr2(SO4)3. Conversion of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) was higher than the conversion of Cr(III) to Cr(VI). The simulation results agree with the field measurements near Cr industries.

Keywords

Atmospheric PM Deliquescence Conceptual model Insoluble and soluble Cr 

Notes

Supplementary material

11869_2019_725_MOESM1_ESM.docx (391 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 390 kb)

References

  1. Ashley K, Howe AM, Demange M, Nygren O (2003) Sampling and analysis considerations for the determination of hexavalent chromium in workplace air. J Environ Monit 5:707–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ATSDR (2012) Toxicological profile for chromium. US Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry:1–419Google Scholar
  3. Bahadur R, Russell LM (2008) Effect of surface tension from MD simulations on size-dependent deliquescence of NaCl nanoparticles. Aerosol Sci Technol 42:369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis A, Olsen RL (1995) The geochemistry of chromium migration and remediation in the subsurface. Groundwater 33:759–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du Preez S, Beukes J, Van Dalen W, Van Zyl P, Paktunc D, Loock-Hattingh M (2017) Aqueous solubility of Cr (VI) compounds in ferrochrome bag filter dust and the implications thereof. Water SA 43:298–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grohse P (1988) The fate of hexavalent chromium in the atmosphere. Research Triangle InstituteGoogle Scholar
  7. Guertin J, Avakian CP, Jacobs JA (2016) Chromium (VI) handbook. CRC press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  8. Hagendorfer H, Uhl M (2007) Speciation of chromium in particulate matter (PM10): development of a routine procedure, impact of transport and toxicological relevance. Μmweltbundesamt, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang L, Fan Z(T), Yu CH, Hopke PK, Lioy PJ, Buckley BT, Lin L, Ma Y (2013) Interconversion of chromium species during air sampling: effects of O3, NO2, SO2, particle matrices, temperature, and humidity. Environ Sci Technol 47:4408–4415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang L, Yu CH, Hopke PK, Lioy PJ, Buckley BT, Shin JY, Fan ZT (2014) Measurement of soluble and total hexavalent chromium in the ambient airborne particles in New Jersey. Aerosol Air Qual Res 14:1939–1949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IARC (1990) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: chromium, nickel and welding. International Agency for Research on CancerGoogle Scholar
  12. Khan MF, Hwa SW, Hou LC, Mustaffa NIH, Amil N, Mohamad N, Sahani M, Jaafar SA, Nadzir MSM, Latif MT (2017) Influences of inorganic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the sources of PM2.5 in the Southeast Asian urban sites. Air Qual Atmos Hlth 10:999–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khlystov A, Ma Y (2006) An on-line instrument for mobile measurements of the spatial variability of hexavalent and trivalent chromium in urban air. Atmos Environ 40:8088–8093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kotaś J, Stasicka Z (2000) Chromium occurrence in the environment and methods of its speciation. Environ Pollut 107:263–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li Y, Pradhan NK, Foley R, Low GK (2002) Selective determination of airborne hexavalent chromium using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Talanta 57:1143–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Majestic BJ, Schauer JJ, Shafer MM (2007) Development of a manganese speciation method for atmospheric aerosols in biologically and environmentally relevant fluids. Aerosol Sci Technol 41:925–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meng Q, Fan Z(T), Buckley B, Lin L, Huang L, Yu CH, Stiles R, Bonanno L (2011) Developmentand evaluation of a method for hexavalent chromium in ambient air using IC-ICP-MS. Atmos Environ 45:2021–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mölders N, Schilling PJ, Wong J, Roos JW, Smith IL (2001) X-ray fluorescence mapping and micro-XANES spectroscopic characterization of exhaust particulates emitted from auto engines burning MMT-added gasoline. Environ Sci Technol 35:3122–3129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. NJDEPA (2012) New Jersey chromium emission inventory. New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  20. Nusko R, Heumann K (1997) Cr (III)/Cr (VI) speciation in aerosol particles by extractive separation and thermal ionization isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Fresen J Anal Chem 357:1050–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Palmer CD, Puls RW (1994) Natural attenuation of hexavalent chromium in groundwater and soils. In: EPA environmental assessment sourcebook. Ann Arbor Press, INC, Chelsea, Michigan, pp 57–72Google Scholar
  22. Pettine M, Tonnina D, Millero FJ (2006) Chromium (VI) reduction by sulphur (IV) in aqueous solutions. Mar Chem 99:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rai D, Sass BM, Moore DA (1987) Chromium (III) hydrolysis constants and solubility of chromium (III) hydroxide. Inorg Chem 26:345–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reaney S, Smith D (2005) Manganese oxidation state mediates toxicity in PC12 cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 205:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ressler T, Wong J, Roos J (1999) Manganese speciation in exhaust particulates of automobiles using MMT-containing gasoline. J Synchrotron Rad 6:656–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ressler T, Wong J, Roos J, Smith IL (2000) Quantitative speciation of Mn-bearing particulates emitted from autos burning (methylcyclopentadienyl) manganese tricarbonyl-added gasolines using XANES spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 34:950–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richter P, Grino P, Ahumada I, Giordano A (2007) Total element concentration and chemical fractionation in airborne particulate matter from Santiago, Chile. Atmos Environ 41:6729–6738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogula-Kozłowska W (2016) Size-segregated urban particulate matter: mass closure, chemical composition, and primary and secondary matter content. Air Qual Atmos Hlth 9:533–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schroeder DC, Lee GF (1975) Potential transformations of chromium in natural waters. Water Air Soil Pollut 4:355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seigneur C, Constantinou E (1995) Chemical kinetic mechanism for atmospheric chromium. Environ Sci Technol 29:222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shah D, Aldamzharov B, Bukayeva A, Torkmahalleh MA, Ahmadi G (2017) Intermolecular interactions and its effect within Cr3+-containing atmospheric particulate matter using molecular dynamics simulations. Atmos Environ 166:334–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Talebi S (2003) Determination of total and hexavalent chromium concentrations in the atmosphere of the city of Isfahan. Environ Res 92:54–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Terraglio FP, Manganelli RM (1967) The absorption of atmospheric sulfur dioxide by water solutions. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 17:403–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Torkmahalleh MA, Lin L, Holsen TM, Rasmussen DH, Hopke PK (2012) The impact of deliquescence and pH on Cr speciation in ambient PM samples. Aerosol Sci Technol 46:690–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Torkmahalleh MA, Lin L, Holsen TM, Rasmussen DH, Hopke PK (2013a) Cr speciation changes in the presence of ozone and reactive oxygen species at low relative humidity. Atmos Environ 71:92–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Torkmahalleh MA, Yu CH, Lin L, Fan Z(T), Swift JL, Bonanno L, Rasmussen DH, Holsen TM, Hopke PK (2013b) Improved atmospheric sampling of hexavalent chromium. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 63:1313–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Torkmahalleh MA, Karibayev M, Konakbayeva D, Fyrillas M, Rule AM (2018) Aqueous chemistry of airborne hexavalent chromium during sampling. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:1059–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Werner M, Nico P, Guo B, Kennedy I, Anastasio C (2006) Laboratory study of simulated atmospheric transformations of chromium in ultrafine combustion aerosol particles. Aerosol Sci Technol 40:545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical and Aerosol Research Team, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital SciencesNazarbayev UniversityNur-SultanKazakhstan
  2. 2.The Environment and Resource Efficiency Cluster (EREC)Nazarbayev UniversityNur-SultanKazakhstan
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringFrederick UniversityNicosiaCyprus
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Health and EngineeringJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and DentistryRochesterUSA
  6. 6.Center for Air Resources Engineering and ScienceClarkson UniversityPotsdamUSA

Personalised recommendations