Advertisement

Springtime warming and biomass burning causing ozone episodes in South and Southwest China

  • Y. C. Lee
  • K. L. ChanEmail author
  • M. O. Wenig
Article

Abstract

A detailed analysis of springtime ozone outbreaks in South/Southwest China is presented in this paper, providing an insight into a regional photochemical and climate problem. A major ozone episode in 2013 was the first ever in April and the worst in Hong Kong up to 2018, measuring a peak ozone concentration of 293 μg m−3. This multi-day, ozone pollution was evidenced by similar conditions in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), and an even more severe episode in Kunming (Yunnan) in Southwest China. Concurrently, widespread air temperature composite anomalies of up to about + 4°K were observed in the region, particularly during 6Z (14:00 local time). The global annual geopotential height anomaly implied increased atmospheric stability and inhibited dispersion—consistent with global warming impacts for the region. Backward trajectories, satellite observations, and transport model simulations characterized the biomass burning sources. Results indicated that activities in Indochina, South and Southwest China, and Africa were the main sources in South China while those in Burma dominated Southwest China. The close succession of outbreaks from west to east (Kunming, Guangzhou, and Hong Kong) suggests an eastward transport of ozone and precursors.

Keywords

Springtime ozone Biomass burning Temperature anomaly Geopotential height anomaly South China Southwest China 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Hong Kong Observatory and the Environmental Protection Department of Hong Kong for the provision of meteorological and air quality data, and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology for the vertical sounding data. The authors would also like to thank the NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for the provision of data and tools used in this publication.

Funding information

The work described in this paper was financially supported by the Marie Curie Initial Training Network of the European Seventh Framework Programme (Grant No. 607905).

Supplementary material

11869_2019_709_Fig6_ESM.png (2.4 mb)
Figure S1

Mean Fire Radiative Power April 2013 (PNG 2441 kb)

11869_2019_709_MOESM1_ESM.tiff (914 kb)
High Resolution Image (TIFF 913 kb)
11869_2019_709_Fig7_ESM.png (2.6 mb)
Figure S2

Aerosol Small Mode Fraction 10–16 April 2013 (PNG 2700 kb)

11869_2019_709_MOESM2_ESM.tiff (818 kb)
High Resolution Image (TIFF 817 kb)
11869_2019_709_Fig8_ESM.png (2 mb)
Figure S3

Pollutant concentrations of NOx, O3, PM10, PM2.5 and CO from 14 to 16 April 2013 (PNG 2010 kb)

11869_2019_709_MOESM3_ESM.tiff (8.4 mb)
High Resolution Image (TIFF 8594 kb)
11869_2019_709_Fig9_ESM.png (8.9 mb)
Figure S4

(a)Surface ozone versus air temperature 12–17 April 2013 (b)Total ozone vs temperature 1–30 April 2003 (c)Total ozone vs temperature 1–30 April 2011 (PNG 9067 kb)

11869_2019_709_MOESM4_ESM.tiff (1.4 mb)
High Resolution Image (TIFF 1481 kb)

References

  1. Anttila P, Stefanovska A, Nestorovska-Krsteska A, Grozdanovski L, Atanasov I, Golubov N, Ristevski P, Toceva M, Lappi S, Walden J (2016) Characterisation of extreme air pollution episodes in an urban valley in the Balkan Peninsula. Air Qual Atmos Health 9:129–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-015-0326-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bey I, Jacob DJ, Yantosca RM, Logan JA, Field BD, Fiore AM, Li Q, Liu HY, Mickley LJ, Schultz MG (2001) Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: model description and evaluation. J Geophys Res Atmos 106(D19):23073–23095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloomer BJ, Stehr JW, Piety CA, Salawitch RJ, Dickerson RR (2009) Observed relationships of ozone air pollution with temperature and emissions. Geophys Res Lett 36(9):L09803.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond TC, Bhardwaj E, Dong R, Jogani R, Jung S, Roden C, Streets DG, Trautmann NM (2007) Historical emissions of black and organic carbon aerosol from energy-related combustion. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 21(2):1850–2000.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan KL, Chan KL (2017) Aerosol optical depths and their contributing sources in Taiwan. Atmos Environ 148:364–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan CY, Chan LY, Chang WL, Zheng YG, Cui H, Zheng XD, Qin Y, Li YS (2003a) Characteristics of a tropospheric ozone profile and implications for the origin of ozone over subtropical China in the spring of 2001. J Geophys Res 108(D20):8800.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan CY, Chan LY, Harris JM, Oltmans SJ, Blake DR, Qin Y, Zheng YG, Zheng XD (2003b) Characteristics of biomass burning emission sources, transport, and chemical speciation in enhanced springtime tropospheric ozone profile over Hong Kong. J Geophys Res Atmos 108(D1):ACH 3–1–ACH 3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan HS, Kok MH, Lee TC (2012) Temperature trends in Hong Kong from a seasonal perspective. Clim Res 55(1):53–63.  https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. China National Environmental Monitoring Centre. Monthly air quality report of 74 cities. Technical Report 2016Google Scholar
  10. Clean Air Asia, China Air 2016, Air pollution prevention and control progress in Chinese cities. Technical Report, 2016Google Scholar
  11. Collins WJ, Derwent RG, Garnier B, Johnson CE, Sanderson MG, Stevenson DS (2003) Effect of stratosphere-troposphere exchange on the future tropospheric ozone trend. J Geophys Res Atmos 108(D12).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002617
  12. Diehl T, Heil A, Chin M, Pan X, Streets D, Schultz M, Kinne S (2012) Anthropogenic, biomass burning, and volcanic emissions of black carbon, organic carbon, and SO2 from 1980 to 2010 for hindcast model experiments. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 12:24895–24954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ding A, Wang T, Zhao M, Wang T, Li Z (2004) Simulation of sea-land breezes and discussion of their implications on the transport of air pollution during a multi-day ozone episode in the Pearl River Delta of China. Atmos Environ 38:6737–6750.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eastham SD, Weisenstein DK, Barrett SRH (2014) Development and evaluation of the unified tropospheric-stratospheric chemistry extension (UCX) for the global chemistry transport model GEOS-Chem. Atmos Environ 89:52–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. EDGAR4.2 (2011) Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), Release Version 4.2. Technical Report MSU-CSE-00-2, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)/Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)Google Scholar
  16. Gelaro R, McCarty W, Suárez MJ, Todling R, Molod A, Takacs L, Randles CA, Darmenov A, Bosilovich MG, Reichle R, Wargan K, Coy L, Cullather R, Draper C, Akella S, Buchard V, Conaty A, da Silva AM, Gu W, Kim G-K, Koster R, Lucchesi R, Merkova D, Nielsen JE, Partyka G, Pawson S, Putman W, Rienecker M, Schubert SD, Sienkiewicz M, Zhao B (2017) The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J Clim 30:5419–5454.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giglio L, Randerson JT, van der Werf GR (2013) Analysis of daily, monthly, and annual burned area using the fourth-generation global fire emissions database (GFED4)(2013). J Geophys Res: Biogeosci, 118(1), 317–328.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20042
  18. Giglio L, Schroeder W, Justice CO (2016) The collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products. Remote Sens Environ 178:31–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. GPEMC-Hong Kong-Macau Pearl River Delta regional air quality monitoring network: a report of monitoring results in 2014. Technical Report 2015Google Scholar
  20. Guangdong Provincial Environmental Monitoring Centre, Guangdong (GPEMC) Hong Kong-Macau Pearl River Delta regional air quality monitoring network: a report of monitoring results in 2013. Technical Report 2014Google Scholar
  21. Guenther AB, Jiang X, Heald CL, Sakulyanontvittaya T, Duhl T, Emmons LK, Wang X (2012) The model of emissions of gases and aerosols from nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geosci Model Dev 5(6):1471–1492.W.  https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hafez YY, Almazroui M (2014) Recent study of anomaly of global annual geopotential height and global warming. Atmos Clim Sci 4:347–357.  https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2014.43035 Google Scholar
  23. Hong Kong Government (2015) Press release related to the release of the reports. Air quality in Hong Kong 2014 and the Pearl River Delta regional air quality monitoring reportGoogle Scholar
  24. Horton DE, Skinner CB, Singh D, Diffenbaugh NS (2014) Occurrence and persistence of future atmospheric stagnation events. Nat Clim Chang 4:698–703.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Data Distribution Centre http://www.ipcc-data.org/guidelines/pages/glossary/glossary_fg.html
  26. Justice CO, Giglio L, Korontzi S, Owens J, Morisette J, Roy D, Descloitres J, Alleaume S, Petitcolin F, Kaufman YJ (2002) The MODIS fire products. Remote Sens Environ 83:244–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00076-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee YC, Wenig M, Zhang Z, Sugimoto N, Larko D, Diehl T (2012) Dust episodes in Hong Kong (South China) and their relationship with the Sharav and Mongolian cyclones and jet streams. Air Qual Atmos Health 5(4):413–424.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-011-0134-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee YC, Lam YF, Kuhlmann G, Wenig MO, Chan KL, Hartl A, Ning Z (2013) An integrated approach to identify the biomass burning sources contributing to black carbon episodes in Hong Kong. Atmos Environ 80:478–487.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee YC, Shindell DT, Faluvegi G, Wenig M, Lam YF, Ning Z, Hao S, Lai CS (2014) Increase of ozone concentrations, its temperature sensitivity and the precursor factor in South China. Tellus B 66.  https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.23455
  30. Li M, Zhang Q, Kurokawa JI, Woo JH, He K, Lu Z, Ohara T, Song Y, Streets DG, Carmichael GR, Cheng Y, Hong C, Huo H, Jiang X, Kang S, Liu F, Su H, Zheng B (2017) MIX: a mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory under the international collaboration framework of the MICS-Asia and HTAP. Atmos Chem Phys 17:935–963.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-935-2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lollar BS, Holland HD, Turekian KK (2004) Treatise on geochemistry. Volume 9: Environmental geochemistry. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  32. Ministry of Science and Technology, PRC (2015) Third National Assessment Report on Climate Change: a study by the Ministry of Science and Technology, China Meteorological Administration, Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering. Presented at the United Nations Climate Change Conference, Paris, November 2015Google Scholar
  33. NASA Goddard homepage for tropospheric ozone. https://acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/Data_services/cloud_slice/. Retrieved 2017
  34. NASA, GSFC, Ozone hole watch, 2013 (version)Google Scholar
  35. NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (n.d.-a) Tropospheric emission spectrometer (TES): intercontinental transport of pollutants. https://tes.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/PollnTransport/
  36. NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (n.d.-b) Tropospheric emission spectrometer (TES): biomass burning. https://tes.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/biomassburning/
  37. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, State of the climate: global climate report - annual 2016, Published online January 2017a, retrieved on July 17, 2017Google Scholar
  38. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Climate monitoring 2017b: anomalies vs. temperatureGoogle Scholar
  39. Petrenko VV, Martinerie P, Novelli P, Etheridge DM, Levin I, Wang Z, Blunier T, Chappellaz J, Kaiser J, Lang P, Steele LP, Hammer S, Mak J, Langenfelds RL, Schwander J, Severinghaus JP, Witrant E, Petron G, Battle MO, Forster G, Sturges WT, Lamarque J-F, Steffen K, White JWC (2013) A 60 yr record of atmospheric carbon monoxide reconstructed from Greenland firn air. Atmos Chem Phys 13:7567–7585.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7567-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stein A, Draxler R, Rolph G, Stunder B, Cohen M, Ngan F (2015) NOAAs HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96(12):2059–2077.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Suarez MJ, et al (2005) Documentation and validation of the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) data assimilation system, version 4. 26Google Scholar
  42. Té Y, Jeseck P, Franco B, Mahieu E, Jones N, Paton-Walsh C, Griffith DWT, Buchholz RR, Hadji-Lazaro J, Hurtmans D, Janssen C (2016) Seasonal variability of surface and column carbon monoxide over the megacity Paris, high-altitude Jungfraujoch and Southern Hemispheric Wollongong stations. Atmos Chem Phys 16(17):10911–10925.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10911-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. USEPA (2016) NAAQS table. Technical report; United States Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  44. USEPA Quality assurance handbook for air pollution measurement systems volume II : ambient air quality monitoring program. EPA-454/B-17-001 January 2017Google Scholar
  45. Zhang YL, Cao F (2015) Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in China at a city level. Sci Rep 5:14884.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14884 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhu J, Xia X, Che H, Wang J, Zhang J, Duan Y (2016) Study of aerosol optical properties at Kunming in Southwest China and long-range transport of biomass burning aerosols from North Burma. Atmos Res 169:237–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.10.0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ziemke JR, Chandra S, Duncan BN, Froidevaux L, Bhartia PK, Levelt PF, Waters JW (2006) Tropospheric ozone determined from Aura OMI and MLS: evaluation of measurements and comparison with the global modeling initiative’s chemical transport model. J Geophys Res Atmos 111(D19).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007089

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Meteorological InstituteLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations