Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 371–377 | Cite as

Chemical sensitivity, asthma, and effects from fragranced consumer products: National Population Study in the United Kingdom

  • Anne SteinemannEmail author
Article

Abstract

Consumer products, such as those with a fragrance, can adversely affect air quality and health. This national study in the United Kingdom (UK) investigated the prevalence of chemical sensitivity, a condition associated with chemical pollutant exposures, and the medical diagnosis of multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS). In addition, it investigated the co-occurrence of chemical sensitivity with asthma and asthma-like conditions, and with fragrance sensitivity (adverse health effects from fragranced consumer products). Using a nationally representative population sample (n = 1100), an online survey was conducted of adults in the UK, comprising England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. The survey found that, across the UK population, 16.3% report chemical sensitivity; 6.6% medically diagnosed MCS; 25.3% are asthmatic, diagnosed with asthma (17.1%), an asthma-like condition (9.0%), or both; and 27.8% are fragrance sensitive. The conditions frequently co-occur: among the chemically sensitive, 57.0% are asthmatic and 77.7% are fragrance sensitive; and among asthmatics, 36.7% are chemically sensitive and 54.0% are fragrance sensitive. Air fresheners and deodorizers trigger health problems for 15.5% of the general population, 52.5% of chemically sensitive, and 38.8% of asthmatics. Disabling health problems can result from exposure to fragranced products for 41.7% of the chemically sensitive and 37.3% of asthmatics. Further, 21.2% of the chemically sensitive and 14.0% of asthmatics lost workdays or a job in the past year due to fragranced products in the workplace. Results indicate that chemical sensitivity is widespread in the UK, affecting over 5.7 million adults, with over 2.3 million diagnosed MCS, 8.9 million asthmatics, and 9.8 million fragrance sensitive. Reducing chemical exposure to problematic sources, such as fragranced consumer products, is a critical step to reduce adverse health and societal effects.

Keywords

United Kingdom Chemical sensitivity Asthma Fragranced consumer product Fragrance Fragrance-free policy Indoor air quality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank the reviewers of this article for their very helpful comments.

Supplementary material

11869_2018_655_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (54 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 54 kb)
11869_2018_655_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (119 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 119 kb)

References

  1. Ashford NA, Miller CS (1998) Chemical exposures: low levels and high stakes, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, N.YGoogle Scholar
  2. Azuma K, Uchiyama I, Katoh T, Ogata H, Arashidani K, Kunugita N (2015) Prevalence and characteristics of chemical intolerance: a Japanese population-based study. Arch Environ Occup Health 70:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caress S, Steinemann A (2005) National Prevalence of asthma and chemical hypersensitivity: an examination of potential overlap. J Occup Environ Med 47(5):518–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caress SM, Steinemann AC (2009a) Prevalence of Fragrance Sensitivity in the American Population. J Environ Health 71(7):46–50Google Scholar
  5. Caress SM, Steinemann AC (2009b) Asthma and chemical hypersensitivity: prevalence, etiology, and age of onset. Toxicol Ind Health 25(1):71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlsson F, Karlson B, Ørbæk P, Österberg K, Östergren P-O (2005) Prevalence of annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells in a Swedish population, and relationship with subjective health and daily functioning. Public Health 119:568–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (EA) Equality Act (2010) Chapter 15. Parliament of the United Kingdom. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/pdfs/ukpga_20100015_en.pdf. Accessed 8 Dec 2018
  8. Eysenbach G (2004) Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 6(3):e34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johansson Å, Brämerson A, Millqvist E, Nordin S, Bende M (2005) Prevalence and risk factors for self-reported odour intolerance: the Skövde population-based study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78:559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kreutzer R, Neutra RR, Lashuay N (1999) Prevalence of people reporting sensitivities to chemicals in a population-based survey. Am J Epidemiol 150(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McDonald BC, de Gouw JA, Gilman JB, Jathar SH, Akherati A, Cappa CD et al (2018) Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions. Science 359(6377):760–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Miller CS, Prihoda TJ (1999) The environmental exposure and sensitivity inventory (EESI): a standardized approach for measuring chemical intolerances for research and clinical applications. Toxicol Ind Health 15(3–4):370–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ott W, Steinemann A, Wallace L (eds) (2007) Exposure analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  14. Palmquist E, Claeson AS, Neely G, Stenberg B, Nordin S (2014) Overlap in prevalence between various types of environmental intolerance. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217(4–5):427–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reid S, Hotopf M, Hull L, Ismail K, Unwin C, Wessely S (2001) Multiple chemical sensitivity and chronic fatigue syndrome in British gulf war veterans. Am J Epidemiol 153(6):604–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reid S, Hotopf M, Hull L, Ismail K, Unwin C, Wessely S (2002) Reported chemical sensitivities in a health survey of United Kingdom military personnel. Occup Environ Med 59(3):196–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Skovbjerg S, Berg ND, Elberling J, Christensen KB (2012) Evaluation of the quick environmental exposure and sensitivity inventory in a Danish population. J Environ Public Health 2012:304314.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/304314
  18. SSI (Survey Sampling International) (2016) Dynamix Sampling Approach. Available from: https://www.surveysampling.com/technology/ssi-dynamix/. Accessed 8 Dec 2018
  19. Steinemann A (2015) Volatile emissions from common consumer products. Air Qual Atmos Health 8(3):273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Steinemann A (2016) Fragranced consumer products: exposures and effects from emissions. Air Qual Atmos Health 9(8):861–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Steinemann A (2017) Health and societal effects from fragranced consumer products. Prev Med Rep 5:45–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Steinemann A (2018a) National Prevalence and effects of multiple chemical sensitivities. J Occup Environ Med 60(3):e152–e156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Steinemann A (2018b) Prevalence and effects of multiple chemical sensitivities in Australia. Prev Med Rep 10:191–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Steinemann A (2018c) Fragranced Consumer Products: Sources of Emissions, Exposures, and Health Effects in the United Kingdom. Air Qual Atmos Health 11(3):253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steinemann A (2018d) Fragranced consumer products: effects on asthmatics. Air Qual Atmos Health 11(1):3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Steinemann A, Wheeler AJ, Larcombe A (2018) Fragranced consumer products: effects on asthmatic Australians. Air Qual Atmos Health 11(4):365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. United Kingdom (UK) (2018) Office for National Statistics. Population Estimates. Analysis Tool mid-2016 UK. 35,395,854 adults 18–65 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates. Accessed 8 Dec 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Melbourne School of EngineeringThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations