Second commutation lemma for fractional H-measures

  • Marko Erceg
  • Ivan IvecEmail author


Classical H-measures introduced by Tartar (Proc R Soc Edinb 115A:193–230, 1990) and independently by Gérard (Commun Partial Differ Equ 16:1761–1794, 1991) are essentially suited for hyperbolic equations while parabolic equations fit in the framework of the parabolic H-measures developed by Antonić and Lazar (2007–2013). More recently the study of differential relations with fractional derivatives prompted the extension of the theory to arbitrary ratios, thus the fractional H-measures were introduced and applied to fractional conservation laws by Mitrović and Ivec (Commun Pure Appl Anal 10(6):1617–1627, 2011). In this paper we explore the transport property of fractional H-measures by studying fractional derivatives of commutators of multiplication and Fourier multiplier operators. In particular, we prove the Second commutation lemma suitable for fractional H-measures, comprehending the known hyperbolic and parabolic cases, while allowing for derivation of the corresponding propagation principle for fractional H-measures. At the end, on a model example we present this derivation of the transport equation for the fractional H-measure.


H-measures Fractional derivatives Propagation principle 

Mathematics Subject Classification

35R11 35S05 46G10 47B47 47G30 


  1. 1.
    Aleksić, J., Pilipović, S., Vojnović, I.: H-distributions via Sobolev spaces. Mediterr. J. Math. 13, 3499–3512 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antonić, N.: H-measures applied to symmetric systems. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 126A, 1133–1155 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antonić, N., Erceg, M., Lazar, M.: Localisation principle for one-scale H-measures. J. Funct. Anal. 272, 3410–3454 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antonić, N., Mitrović, D.: H-distributions: an extension of H-measures to an \({\rm L}^p-{\rm L}^q\) setting. Abs. Appl. Anal. 2011 Article ID 901084 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Antonić, N., Lazar, M.: H-measures and variants applied to parabolic equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 343, 207–225 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Antonić, N., Lazar, M.: Parabolic variant of H-measures in homogenisation of a model problem based on Navier-Stokes equation. Nonlinear Anal. B Real World Appl. 11, 4500–4512 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Antonić, N., Lazar, M.: Parabolic H-measures. J. Funct. Anal. 265, 1190–1239 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Antonić, N., Mišur, M., Mitrović, D.: On the First commutation lemma (submitted)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erceg, M., Ivec, I.: On generalisation of H-measures. Filomat (in press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Francfort, G.A., Murat, F.: Oscillations and energy densities in the wave equation. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 17, 1785–1865 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gérard, P.: Microlocal defect measures. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 16, 1761–1794 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Golbabai, A., Sayevand, K.: Fractional calculus—a new approach to the analysis of generalized fourth-order diffusion-wave equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 61, 2227–2231 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hörmander, L.: The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators II. Springer, Berlin (2005)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hörmander, L.: The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III. Springer, Berlin (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lazar, M., Mitrović, D.: Velocity averaging—a general framework. Dyn. Partial Differ. Equ. 9, 239–260 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mišur, M., Mitrović, D.: On a generalisation of compensated compactness in the \(L^p-L^q\) setting. J. Funct. Anal. 268, 1904–1927 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitrović, D., Ivec, I.: A generalization of H-measures and application on purely fractional scalar conservation laws. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 10(6), 1617–1627 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Panov, E.Y.: Ultra-parabolic equations with rough coefficients: entropy solutions and strong pre-compactness property. J. Math. Sci. 159, 180–228 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Panov, E.Y.: Ultra-parabolic H-measures and compensated compactness. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 28, 47–62 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Samko, S.G., Kilbas, A.A., Marichev, O.I.: Fractional Integrals and Derivative: Theory and Applications. Gordon & Breach Sci. Publishers, London (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tartar, L.: H-measures, a new approach for studying homogenisation, oscillations and concentration effects in partial differential equations. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 115A, 193–230 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tartar, L.: The General Theory of Homogenization: A Personalized Introduction. Springer, Berlin (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi AvanzatiTriesteItaly
  3. 3.Faculty of MetallurgyUniversity of ZagrebSisakCroatia

Personalised recommendations