Advertisement

Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 442–454 | Cite as

A Novel Multi-Points Laser Monitoring of Building Settlement and Its Risk Evaluation

  • Caiping ChaiEmail author
  • Zejian Wu
  • Huifeng Wang
  • Limin Guan
  • He Huang
  • Kenan Mu
  • Wenfen Cui
  • Ting Hao
Information Technology
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Aiming at the defects of routine settlement measurement methods, such as complicated procedures, time-consuming and labor-intensive, high cost and low measurement accuracy, based on the analysis of existing engineering measurement technical requirements and specifications, a multi-point high precision and high efficiency based on laser reference is proposed. The automatic building settlement real-time monitoring system program gives the principle and system model of single-point settlement observation. The model of multi-point scanning settlement monitoring system and the model of multi-point network settlement monitoring system are designed, and their advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. We focus on the networked multi-point settlement monitoring system for network cumulative error analysis, and propose related evaluation and correction methods. The hardware schematic and software block diagram of the laser reference measurement and measurement system of the single point settlement acquisition system are given. Finally, the risk of subsidence state is quantitatively evaluated based on multi-point settlement monitoring data. The measurement error of this method is less than 300 µm, which can realize the monitoring and evaluation of the overall settlement.

Key words

measurement technology laser reference settlement chain linear array Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) 

CLC number

TU 196.2 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Nour A, Slimani A, Laouami N. Foundation settlement statistics via finite element analysis [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2002, 29(8): 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Petri R, Nuikka M, Suominen A, et al. Comparison of measurement techniques and static theory applied to concrete beam deformation [J]. The Photogrammetric Record, 2009, 24(128): 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Lee I M, Lee J S, Nam S W. Effect of seepage force on tunnel face stability reinforced with multi-step pipe grouting [J]. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19(6): 551–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Matsuda H, Tsutsui T, Ikeda K, et al. Application of GPS displacement measurements for monitoring slope displacements at a tunnel entrance [J]. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 2012, 68(2): 21–28.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bardi F, Frodella W, Ciampalini A, et al. Integration between ground based and satellite SAR data in landslide mapping: The San Fratello case study [J]. Geomorphology, 2014, 223: 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Brenot H, Lejeune S, Warnant R. Detection of small-scale structures in the neutral atmosphere using double differences of GNSS measurements [J]. Heredity, 2008, 62(3): 335–342.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Yang L, Liu J Y, Wang Y C, et al. 3D dense reconstruction based on omnidirectional camera and laser range finder [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University, 2014, 48(8): 1481–1487(Ch).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Teng Y J. Understanding and application of the concept of bearing capacity of foundation in code for design of building foundation [J]. Engineering Investigation, 2004, (3): 1–2 (Ch).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Zhang Q Q. Experimental and Theoretical Study on the Mechanical and Settlement Characteristics of Pile Foundation in Soft Soil [D]. Zhejiang: Zhejiang University, 2012(Ch).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Soman M R, Hall D J, Tutt J H, et al. Developing a CCD camea with high spatial resolution for RIXS in the soft X-ray rane [J]. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, 2013, 731(12): 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Yang J. Research on All-Round Monitoring Method and Technology of Roadbed Settlement [D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2014(Ch).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Yoneyama S, Kitagawa A, Iwata S, et al. Bridge deflection measurement using digital image correlation [J]. Experimental Techniques, 2007, 31(1): 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Xie G Y. Research on Multi-Factor Risk Assessment Method for Mountain Bridge Construction Period [D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2013(Ch).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Wu K Y, Zhang X Z, Huang Y W, et al. The feasibility study on settlement monitoring of a parallel combination prediction method based on ELMD [J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2017, 42(10): 1482–1488.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Deng Z, Ke Y H, Gong H L, et al. Land subsidence prediction in Beijing based on PS-InSAR technique and improved Grey-Markov mode [J]. Giscience & Remote Sensing, 2017, 54(06): 797–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Bradey C A, Rolka H, Walker D, et al. BioSense: Implementation of a national early event detection and situational awareness system [J]. Mmwr Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2005, 54Suppl: 11–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wuhan University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caiping Chai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zejian Wu
    • 2
  • Huifeng Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Limin Guan
    • 2
  • He Huang
    • 2
  • Kenan Mu
    • 2
  • Wenfen Cui
    • 2
  • Ting Hao
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Highway & Railway EngineeringShaanxi College of Communication TechnologyXi’an, ShaanxiChina
  2. 2.School of Electronic & Control EngineeringChang’an UniversityXi’an, ShaanxiChina

Personalised recommendations