Advertisement

ZDM

pp 1–15 | Cite as

Exploring everyday examples to explain basis: insights into student understanding from students in Germany

  • Michelle ZandiehEmail author
  • Aditya Adiredja
  • Jessica Knapp
Original Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

There is relatively little research specifically about student understanding of basis. Our ongoing work addresses student understanding of basis from an anti-deficit perspective, which focuses on the resources that students have to make sense of basis using everyday ideas. Using data from a group of women of color in the United States, we previously developed an analytical framework to describe student understanding about basis, including codes related to characteristics of basis vectors and roles of basis vectors in the vector space. In this paper, we utilize the methods of the previous study to further enrich our findings about student understanding of basis. By analyzing interview data from students in Germany, we found that this group of students most often used ideas that we describe by the roles generating, structuring, and traveling, and the characteristics different and essential. Some of the themes that emerged from the data illustrate common pairings of these ideas, students’ flexibility in interpreting multiple roles within one everyday example, and the ways that the roles and characteristics motivate students to create additional examples. We also discuss two ways that differences between the German and English languages were pointed out by students in the interviews.

Keywords

Linear algebra Basis Everyday examples Student thinking Conceptual metaphor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers DUE-1246083 and 1712524. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.

References

  1. Adiredja, A. P. (in press). Anti-deficit storytelling: Engaging the politics of research on mathematical sense making. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.Google Scholar
  2. Adiredja, A., Belangér-Rioux, R., & Zandieh, M. (in press). Everyday examples about basis from students: An anti-deficit approach in the classroom. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Adiredja, A., & Zandieh, M. (2017). Using Intuitive Examples from Women of Color to Reveal Nuances about Basis. In A. Weinberg, C. Rasmussen, J. Rabin, M. Wawro, and S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 346–359). San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews-Larson, C., Wawro, M., & Zandieh, M. (2017). A hypothetical learning trajectory for conceptualizing matrices as linear transformations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(6), 809–829.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1276225.Google Scholar
  5. Aydin, S. (2014). Using example generation to explore students’ understanding of the concepts of linear dependence/independence in linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(6), 813–826.Google Scholar
  6. Bagley, S., & Rabin, J. M. (2016). Students’ Use of Computational Thinking in Linear Algebra. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(1), 83–104.Google Scholar
  7. Bartell, T., Wager, A., Edwards, A., Battey, D., Foote, M., & Spencer, J. (2017). Toward a Framework for Research Linking Equitable Teaching with the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(1), 7–21.Google Scholar
  8. Barton, B. (2008). The language of mathematics: Telling mathematical tales (Vol. 44). Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  9. Bills, L., Dreyfus, T., Mason, J., Tsamir, P., Watson, A., & Zaslavsky, O. (2006). Exemplification in mathematics education. In: Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 1, 126–154.Google Scholar
  10. Bogomolny, M. (2007). Raising students’ understanding: Linear algebra. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 2, 65–72.Google Scholar
  11. Cárcamo, A., Fortuny, J., & Fuentealba, C. (2017). The emergent models in linear algebra: an example with spanning set and span. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications.  https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx015.Google Scholar
  12. Çelik, D. (2015). Investigating students’ modes of thinking in linear algebra: the case of linear independence. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/index.htm.
  13. Civil, M. (2011). Mathematics education, language policy, and English language learners. In W. F. Tate, K. D. King & C. Rousseau Anderson (Eds.), Disrupting tradition: Research and practice pathways in mathematics education (pp. 77–91). Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  14. diSessa, A. A., Sherin, B., & Levin, M. (2016). Knowledge Analysis: An introduction. In A. A. diSessa, M. Levin & N. J. S. Brown. (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction: A synthetic agenda for the learning sciences (pp. 30–71). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Dogan-Dunlap, H. (2010). Linear algebra students’ modes of reasoning: Geometric representations. Linear algebra and its applications, 432(8), 2141–2159.Google Scholar
  16. Edwards, B. S., & Ward, M. B. (2004). Surprises from mathematics education research: Student (mis)use of mathematical definitions. Mathematical Association of America Monthly, 111, 411–424.Google Scholar
  17. Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical thinking and learning, 1(2), 155–177.Google Scholar
  18. Gutiérrez, R. (2008). A “gap gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 357–364.Google Scholar
  19. Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68.Google Scholar
  20. Knapp, J. (2009). Appropriating New Definitions: The Case of Lipschitz Functions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  21. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic books.Google Scholar
  23. Nasir, N. I. S., Snyder, C. R., Shah, N., & Ross, K. M. (2013). Racial storylines and implications for learning. Human Development, 55(5–6), 285–301.Google Scholar
  24. Oehrtman, M. (2009). Collapsing dimensions, physical limitation, and other student metaphors for limit concepts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 396–426.Google Scholar
  25. Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209.Google Scholar
  26. Plaxco, D., & Wawro, M. (2015). Analyzing student understanding in linear algebra through mathematical activity. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 38, 87–100.Google Scholar
  27. Schlarmann, K. (2013). Conceptual Understanding In Linear Algebra—Reconstruction Of Mathematics Students’ Mental Structures Of The Concept Basis. In B. Ubuz, Ç. Haser, & M.A. Mariotti (Hrsg.), Proceeding of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (S. 2426–2435). Ankara: Türkei: Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar
  28. Selinski, N., Rasmussen, C., Wawro, M., & Zandieh, M. (2014). A methodology for using adjacency matrices to analyze the connections students make between concepts: The case of linear algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(5), 550–583.Google Scholar
  29. Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter storytelling as an analytic framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(23), 23–44.Google Scholar
  30. Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. (2010). Student learning of basis, span and linear independence in linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(2), 173–188.Google Scholar
  31. Teo, T. (2008). From speculation to epistemological violence in psychology: A critical- hermeneutic reconstruction. Theory and Psychology, 18(1), 47–67.Google Scholar
  32. Trigueros, M., & Possani, E. (2013). Using an economics model for teaching linear algebra. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 438(4), 1779–1792.Google Scholar
  33. Turner, E. E., & Celedón-Pattichis, S. (2011). Mathematical problem solving among Latina/o kindergartners: An analysis of opportunities to learn. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10(2), 146–169.Google Scholar
  34. Valencia, R. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Wawro, M. (2014). Student reasoning about the invertible matrix theorem in linear algebra. ZDM, 46, 389–406.Google Scholar
  36. Wawro, M., Rasmussen, C., Zandieh, M., Sweeney, G., & Larson, C. (2012). An inquiry-oriented approach to span and linear independence: The case of the Magic Carpet Ride sequence. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 22(7), 1–23.Google Scholar
  37. Zandieh, M., Ellis, J., & Rasmussen, C. (2017). A characterization of a unified notion of mathematical function: the case of high school function and linear transformation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(1), 21–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9737-0.Google Scholar
  38. Zandieh, M., & Knapp, J. (2006). Exploring the role of metonymy in mathematical understanding and reasoning: The concept of derivative as an example. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  39. Zandieh, M., Plaxco, D., Williams-Pierce, C., & Amresh, A. (2018). Drawing on three fields of education research to frame the development of digital games for inquiry-oriented linear algebra. In A. Weinberg, C. Rasmussen, J. Rabin, M. Wawro, and S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 1270–1279). San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  40. Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2008). Exemplifying definitions: a case of a square. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 131–148.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science and Mathematics Faculty, College of Letters and SciencesArizona State UniversityMesaUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Harding UniversitySearcyUSA

Personalised recommendations