Advertisement

ZDM

pp 1–14 | Cite as

A zone theory approach to analysing identity formation in mathematics education

  • Merrilyn Goos
  • Anne Bennison
Original Article

Abstract

This article examines possibilities for using Valsiner’s zone theory to understand identity formation of mathematics teachers and mathematics teacher educators. We situate our analysis within a sociological frame for identity research, in which identity is interpreted as an action rather than an acquisition. Valsiner’s theoretical approach is based on Vygotsky’s notion of the zone of proximal development, but adds two other zone concepts to account for environmental constraints experienced by an individual (zone of free movement) and the means by which other people in the environment promote the individual’s actions (zone of promoted action). We briefly summarise our previous research that has used zone theory to interpret teacher learning as identity formation in two contexts, involving secondary school mathematics teachers and teachers of subjects other than mathematics who are embedding numeracy into the school curriculum. We then extend our theoretical investigation of identity to a new context in order to analyse identity formation of mathematics teacher educators, that is, mathematics educators and mathematicians who contribute to the preparation of future teachers of mathematics. Our analysis incorporates the idea of productive tensions into zone theory, thus creating a theory of goal-directed change that can be used to understand identity development and the role of individual agency within sociocultural contexts.

Keywords

Identity Mathematics teachers Mathematics teacher educators Valsiner’s zone theory Agency Productive tensions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Australian Research Council (Grant nos. DP0664415, DP120100694) and Australian Government Department of Education and Training (Grant no. MS13-3174).

References

  1. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2018). General capabilities. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  2. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2017). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
  3. Bansilal, S. (2011). Assessment reform in South Africa: Opening up or closing spaces for teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78, 91–107.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9311-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennison, A. (2015a). Developing an analytic lens for investigating identity as an embedder-of-numeracy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0129-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennison, A. (2015b). Supporting teachers to embed numeracy across the curriculum: A sociocultural approach. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 561–573.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0706-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennison, A. (2016). A sociocultural approach to understanding identity as an embedder-of-numeracy: A case of numeracy and history. European Educational Research Journal, 15(4), 491–502.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116643327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennison, A. (2017a). Re-examining a framework for teacher identity as an embedder-of-numeracy. In A. Downton, S. Livy, & J. Hall (Eds.), 40 years on: We are still learning (Proceedings of the 40th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Group of Australasia) (pp. 101–108). Melbourne: MERGA.Google Scholar
  9. Bennison, A. (2017b). Understanding the trajectory of a teacher’s identity as an embedder-of-numeracy. In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.). Proceedings of the 41st conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (vol. 2, pp. 145–152.). Singapore: PME.Google Scholar
  10. Bergsten, C., & Grevholm, B. (2008). Knowledgeable teacher educators and linking practices. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (vol. 4, The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional) (pp. 223–246). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Beswick, K., Chapman, O., Goos, M., & Zaslavsky, O. (2015). Mathematics teacher educators’ knowledge for teaching. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), The proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education: Intellectual and attitudinal challenges (pp. 629–632). Berlin: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
  12. Bjuland, R., Cestari, M., & Borgersen, H. (2012). Professional mathematics teacher identity: Analysis of reflective narratives from discourses and activities. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 405–424.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9216-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blanton, M., Westbrook, S., & Carter, G. (2005). Using Valsiner’s zone theory to interpret teaching practices in mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 5–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-0456-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapman, O. (2008). Mathematics teacher educators’ learning from research on their instructional practices. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: vol. 4: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (pp. 110–129). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Chick, H., & Beswick, K. (2017). Teaching teachers to teach Boris: A framework for mathematics teacher educator pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9362-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darragh, L. (2016). Identity research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Freitas, E. (2008). Troubling teacher identity: Preparing mathematics teachers to teach for diversity. Teaching Education, 19, 43–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210701860024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Department of Education and Training (DET). (2016). Enhancing the training of mathematics and science teachers program. https://www.education.gov.au/enhancing-training-mathematics-and-science-teachers-projects. Retrieved 23 Apr 2018.
  19. Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J., & Welsh, K. M. (2005). Complex dilemmas of identity and practice. Science Education, 90, 68–93.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gee, J. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X025001099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geiger, V., Anderson, J., & Hurrell, D. (2017). A case study of effective practice in mathematics teaching and learning informed by Valsiner’s zone theory. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29, 143.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0191-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodnough, K. (2011). Examining the long-term impact of collaborative action research on teacher identity and practice: The perceptions of K-12 teachers. Educational Action Research, 19, 73–86.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.547694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goos, M. (2005). A sociocultural analysis of the development of pre-service and beginning teachers’ pedagogical identities as users of technology. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(1), 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goos, M. (2008). Sociocultural perspectives on learning to teach mathematics. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 4, The mathematics teacher as a developing professional) (pp. 75–91). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Goos, M. (2013). Sociocultural perspectives in research on and with teachers: A zone theory approach. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45, 521–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goos, M. (2014a). Creating opportunities to learn in mathematics education: A sociocultural perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goos, M. (2014b). Technology integration in secondary school mathematics: The development of teacher professional identities. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital era: An international perspective on technology focused professional development (pp. 139–161). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2018). Boundary crossing and brokering between disciplines in pre-service mathematic teacher education. Mathematics Education Research Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0232-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2014). Transforming professional practice in numeracy teaching. In Y. Li, E. Silver & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Multiple approaches and practices (pp. 81–102). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Graven, M., & Buytenhuys, E. (2011). Mathematical literacy in South Africa: Increasing access and quality in learners’mathematical participation both in and beyond the classroom. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 493–508). Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hobbs, L. (2012). Examining the aesthetic dimensions of teaching: Relationships between teacher knowledge, identity and passion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 718–727.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachicotte, W., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hussain, M., Monaghan, J., & Threlfall, J. (2013). Teacher-student development in mathematics classrooms: Interrelated zones of free movement and promoted action. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 285–302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9426-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krainer, K. (2008). Reflecting the development of a mathematics teacher educator and his discipline. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (vol. 4, pp. 177–199). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Kubiak, C., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Appleby, K., Kempster, M., Reed, M., Solvason, C., & Thorpe, M. (2014). Brokering boundary encounters. In E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak & B. Wenger-Trayner (Eds.), Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning (pp. 81–95). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19–44). Westport: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Lerman, S. (2001). A review of research perspectives on mathematics teacher education. In F.-L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 33–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marshman, M., & Goos, M. (2018). The beliefs about mathematics, its teaching and learning of those involved in secondary mathematics pre-service teacher education. In J. Hunter, P. Perger, & L. Darragh (Eds.), Making waves, opening spaces (Proceedings of the 41st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 519–526). Auckland: MERGA.Google Scholar
  40. Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity. In P. Denicolo & M. Kompf (Eds.), Connecting policy and practice: Challenges for teaching and learning in schools and universities (pp. 5–21). New York: Routledge Farmer.Google Scholar
  42. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tzur, R. (2001). Becoming a mathematics teacher educator: Conceptualizing the terrain through self-reflective analysis. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 259–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action: A theory of human development (2nd edn.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  45. Van Zoest, L. R., & Bohl, J., V (2005). Mathematics teacher identity: A framework for understanding secondary school mathematics teachers’ learnng through practice. Teacher Development, 9, 315–345.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530500200258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zazkis, R., & Zazkis, D. (2011). The significance of mathematical knowledge in teaching elementary methods courses: Perspectives of mathematics teacher educators. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LimerickLimerickIreland
  2. 2.University of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsAustralia

Personalised recommendations