Mathematical-metacognitive discourse: how can it be developed among teachers and their students? Empirical evidence from a videotaped lesson and two case studies
This study aims to investigate a mathematical-metacognitive discourse model with IMPROVE metacognitive self-question prompts (What, How/When, and Why) in order to promote a deeper level of discourse in mathematics classes. The study involved 32 math teachers and 824 fifth-grade students (from 32 public schools) from one district in Israel. Participants were assigned to a randomized, controlled quasi-experimental trial, including an experimental group exposed to mathematical-metacognitive discourse, focusing on metacognitive skills (i.e., planning, monitoring, and reflection) used to arrive at solutions, and a control group exposed to mathematical discourse, focusing on cognitive knowledge (i.e., declarative, procedural, and explanatory). An in-depth analysis was conducted, using a mixed approach (quantitative and qualitative), of a recorded video teacher-student class discourse lesson at the end of the study in each class (n = 32) as well as case studies of two teachers (one from each group) focusing on discourse pattern and their talk moves in class. The findings indicated that the experimental group exhibited more conceptual verbalization related to planning and reflection processes, whereas the control group scored the highest with regard to procedural knowledge. As a transfer measure from the intervention program at the end of the study, students in the experimental group outperformed the control group in terms of problem-solving and sensemaking performance. This study contributes further to understanding discourse by introducing the concept of mathematical-metacognitive discourse competence. Moreover, the study has practical implications for the promotion of discourse in mathematical lessons.
KeywordsMathematical-metacognitive discourse Mathematical performance Intervention study Class discourse videotaped lesson Case study
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Koellner, K., & Swackhamer, L. E. (2015). Mathematics professional development: Improving teaching using the problem-solving cycle and leadership preparation models. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, grades K-6 (2nd edn.). Sausalito: Math Solutions.Google Scholar
- Cleary, T. J., Velardi, B., & Schnaidman, B. (2017). Effects of the self-regulation empowerment program (SREP) on middle school students’ strategic skills, self-efficacy, and mathematics achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 64, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cobb, P. (2006). Supporting productive whole class discussions. Paper presented at the conference on Quality Teaching of Mathematics, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from. http://www.nzmaths.co.nz/sites/default/files/Numeracy/References/PaulCobb.ppt. Accessed 21 Apr 2018.
- Erath, K., Prediger, S., Quasthoff, U. Q., & Heller, V. (2018). Discourse competence as important part of academic language proficiency in mathematics classrooms: the case of explaining to learn and learning to explain. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9830-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hattie, J. A. C., & Yates, G. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kistner,S.,Rakoczy,K.,Otto,B.,Dignath-van Ewijk,C.,Büttner,G., & Klieme,E.(2010).Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: Investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2),157–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9055-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kramarski, B. (2017). Teachers as agents in promoting students’ SRL and performance: Applications for teachers’ dual-role training program. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd edn., pp. 223–239). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Maguire, T., & Neill, A. (2006). Classroom discourse (mathematics). Retrieved from https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/classroom-discourse-mathematics. Accessed 21 Apr 2018.
- Mason, J., & Spence, M. (2000). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing–to act in the moment. In D. Tirosh (Ed.), Forms of mathematical knowledge: Learning and teaching with understanding (pp. 135–165). Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1584-3_7.Google Scholar
- National Authority for Measurement and Evaluation in Education [RAMA]. (2012). Erkat mivkhan (Nosakh A)—Matematika l’kitot he [Test kit (version A)—Mathematics for 5th grade]. Retrieved from http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Rama/MivchaneyMadafLamore02/MathematikaKitaHe/Erka_math_5_2012_heb.htm. Accessed 21 Apr 2018.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM].Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf. Accessed 21 Apr 2018.
- Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics. In R. Cohen, Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1102–1118). Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
- Saldana, J. (2015). Thinking quality: Methods of mind. Los Angeles: Arizona University Press.Google Scholar
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 165–197). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- van Beek, J. A., de Jong, F. P. C. M., Minnaer, A. E. M. G., & Wubbels, Th (2014). Teacher practice in secondary vocational education: Between teacher-regulated activities of student learning and student self-regulation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- VanCleave, M., & Fredericks, J. (2009). Student mathematical discourse and team teaching. In L. Knott (Ed.), The role of mathematics discourse in producing leaders of discourse (pp. 1–16). Charlotte: IAP.Google Scholar
- Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & de Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar