Advertisement

How to enhance radical innovation? The importance of organizational design and generative learning

  • Emilio Domínguez EscrigEmail author
  • Francisco Fermín Mallén Broch
  • Rafael Lapiedra Alcamí
  • Ricardo Chiva Gómez
Original Paper
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

While previous studies have tried to disentangle how the structure of an organization influences its capability to innovate, the results obtained to date are inconclusive and often contradictory. As a result, it is difficult to generalize the conclusions of previous research. In this regard, some authors have pointed out that it is necessary to consider mediating variables to explain how the structure of the organization or some of its characteristics affect innovation. Since the effects of an organic structure must be investigated in conjunction with firm-specific capabilities, such as those related to organizational learning processes, this study considered the role of generative learning as an explanatory variable. Generative learning has the potential to question the current norms of the organization, going beyond simple improvements, in a process that involves intuition, attention, dialogue and inquiry. Using a sample of 251 companies, this study provides empirical evidence of the mediating role of generative learning in the relationship between organic structure and radical innovation.

Keywords

Organic structure Organizational design Generative learning Radical innovation 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90B70 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University Jaume I under Grant P11B2008-13; and the Spanish Innovation Ministry, under Grant ECO2011-26780.

References

  1. Ahire SL, Golhar DY, Waller MA (1996) Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decis Sci 27(1):23–56Google Scholar
  2. Alegre J, Chiva R (2008) Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test. Technovation 28(6):315–326Google Scholar
  3. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411Google Scholar
  4. Antonakis J, Bendahan S, Jacquart P, Lalive R (2010) On making causal claims: a review and recommendations. Leadersh Q 21(6):1086–1120Google Scholar
  5. Argyris C, Schon DA (1974) Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  6. Arthur JB, Aiman-Smith L (2001) Gainsharing and organizational learning: an analysis of employee suggestions over time. Acad Manag J 44(4):737–754Google Scholar
  7. Baker WE, Sinkula JM (2002) Market orientation, learning orientation and product innovation: delving into the organization’s black box. J Mark Focus Manag 5(1):5–23Google Scholar
  8. Baker WE, Sinkula JM (2007) Does market orientation facilitate balanced innovation programs? An organizational learning perspective. J Prod Innov Manag 24(4):316–334Google Scholar
  9. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182Google Scholar
  10. Burns TE, Stalker GM (1961) The management of innovation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in EntrepreneurshipGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabello-Medina C, Carmona-Lavado A, Cuevas-Rodríguez G (2011) Organisation of R&D Departments as determinant of innovation: testing alternative explanations. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 23(4):383–400Google Scholar
  12. Calabretta G, Gemser G, Wijnberg NM (2017) The interplay between intuition and rationality in strategic decision making: a paradox perspective. Organ Stud 38(3–4):365–401Google Scholar
  13. Cardinal LB (2001) Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: the use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organ Sci 12(1):19–36Google Scholar
  14. Chandy RK, Tellis GJ (1998) Organizing for radical product innovation: the overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. J Mark Res 35:474–487Google Scholar
  15. Chandy RK, Tellis GJ (2000) The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. J Mark 64(3):1–17Google Scholar
  16. Chen ST, Chang BG (2012) The effects of absorptive capacity and decision speed on organizational innovation: a study of organizational structure as an antecedent variable. Contemp Manag Res 8(1):27Google Scholar
  17. Chiva R, Alegre J (2009) Organizational learning capability and job satisfaction: an empirical assessment in the ceramic tile industry. Br J Manag 20(3):323–340Google Scholar
  18. Chiva R, Habib J (2015) A framework for organizational learning: zero, adaptive and generative learning. J Manag Org 21(3):350–368Google Scholar
  19. Chiva R, Grandío A, Alegre J (2010) Adaptive and generative learning: implications from complexity theories. Int J Manag Rev 12(2):114–129Google Scholar
  20. Chung HF, Yang Z, Huang PH (2015) How does organizational learning matter in strategic business performance? The contingency role of Guanxi networking. J Bus Res 68(6):1216–1224Google Scholar
  21. Cooper P (2005) A study of innovators’ experience of new product innovation in organisations. R&D Manag 35(5):525–533Google Scholar
  22. Cosh A, Fu X, Hughes A (2012) Organisation structure and innovation performance in different environments. Small Bus Econ 39(2):301–317Google Scholar
  23. Dedahanov AT, Rhee C, Yoon J (2017) Organizational structure and innovation performance: Is employee innovative behavior a missing link? Career Dev Int 22(4):334–350Google Scholar
  24. Droge C, Calantone R, Harmancioglu N (2008) New product success: Is it really controllable by managers in highly turbulent environments? J Prod Innov Manag 25(3):272–286Google Scholar
  25. Edmondson AC (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: a group-level perspective. Organ Sci 13(2):128–146Google Scholar
  26. Espinosa MD, Lindahl JM (2016) Organizational design as a learning enabler: a fuzzy-set approach. J Bus Res 69(4):1340–1344Google Scholar
  27. European Innovation Scoreboard (2017) http://eceuropa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en Accessed 14 June 2018
  28. Fernández-Mesa A, Alegre-Vidal J, Chiva-Gómez R, Gutiérrez-Gracia A (2013) Design management capability and product innovation in SMEs. Manag Decis 51(3):547–565Google Scholar
  29. Fiol CM, Lyles MA (1985) Organizational learning. Acad Manag Rev 10(4):803–813Google Scholar
  30. Gatignon H, Tushman ML, Smith W, Anderson P (2002) A structural approach to assessing innovation: construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Manag Sci 48(9):1103–1122Google Scholar
  31. Govindaraju VGR, Krishnan Vijayaraghavan G, Pandiyan V (2013) Product and process innovation in Malaysian manufacturing: the role of government organizational innovation and exports. Innov Org Manag 15(1):52–68Google Scholar
  32. Hage J (1980) Theories of organizations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Hair HF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1999) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Herrmann A, Gassmann O, Eisert U (2007) An empirical study of the antecedents for radical product innovations and capabilities for transformation. J Eng Technol Manag 24(1):92–120Google Scholar
  35. Holahan PJ, Sullivan ZZ, Markham SK (2014) Product development as core competence: how formal product development practices differ for radical, more innovative, and incremental product innovations. J Prod Innov Manag 31(2):329–345Google Scholar
  36. Hunter ST, Cushenbery LD, Jayne B (2017) Why dual leaders will drive innovation: resolving the exploration and exploitation dilemma with a conservation of resources solution. J Org Behav 38(8):1183–1195Google Scholar
  37. Jean RJB, Deng Z, Kim D, Yuan X (2016) Assessing endogeneity issues in international marketing research. Int Mark Rev 33(3):483–512Google Scholar
  38. Jelinek M, Schoonhoven C (1993) The innovation marathon. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim N, Atuahene-Gima K (2010) Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. J Prod Innov Manag 27(4):519–536Google Scholar
  40. Li Y, Vanhaverbeke W, Schoenmakers W (2008) Exploration and exploitation in innovation: reframing the interpretation. Creat Innov Manag 17(2):107–126Google Scholar
  41. Li J, Vertinsky I, Zhang H (2013) The quality of domestic legal institutions and export performance. Manag Int Rev 53(3):361–390Google Scholar
  42. MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM (2012) Common method bias in marketing: causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. J Retail 88(4):542–555Google Scholar
  43. MacKinnon DP, Coxe S, Baraldi AN (2012) Guidelines for the investigation of mediating variables in business research. J Bus Psychol 27:1–14Google Scholar
  44. Malik P, Garg P (2017) The relationship between learning culture, inquiry and dialogue, knowledge sharing structure and affective commitment to change. J Org Change Manag 30(4):610–631Google Scholar
  45. Mallén F, Chiva R, Alegre J, Guinot J (2015) Organicity and performance in excellent HRM organizations: the importance of organizational learning capability. RMS 10:463–485Google Scholar
  46. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87Google Scholar
  47. Martínez-León IM, Martínez-García JA (2011) The influence of organizational structure on organizational learning. Int J Manpow 32(5/6):537–566Google Scholar
  48. McDermott CM, O’Connor GC (2002) Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues. J Prod Innov Manag 19(6):424–438Google Scholar
  49. McGill ME, Slocum JW, Lei D (1992) Management practices in learning organizations. Org Dyn 21(1):5–17Google Scholar
  50. Menguc B, Auh S (2010) Development and return on execution of product innovation capabilities: the role of organizational structure. Ind Mark Manag 39(5):820–831Google Scholar
  51. Morgan RE, Berthon P (2008) Market orientation, generative learning, innovation strategy and business performance inter-relationships in bioscience firms. J Manag Stud 45(8):1329–1353Google Scholar
  52. Nahm AY, Vonderembse MA, Koufteros XA (2003) The impact of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant performance. J Oper Manag 21(3):281–306Google Scholar
  53. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Malley L, O’Dwyer M, McNally RC, Murphy S (2014) Identity, collaboration and radical innovation: the role of dual organisation identification. Ind Mark Manag 43(8):1335–1342Google Scholar
  55. OECD-EUROSTAT (2005) The measurement of scientific and technological activities proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological data. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  56. Olson EM, Walker OC Jr., Ruekert RW (1995) Organizing for effective new product development: the moderating role of product innovativeness. J Mark 59:48–62Google Scholar
  57. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544Google Scholar
  58. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol 6:539–569Google Scholar
  59. Raj R, Srivastava KB (2013) The mediating role of organizational learning on the relationship among organizational culture, HRM practices and innovativeness. Manag Labour Stud 38(3):201–223Google Scholar
  60. Ramezan M (2011) Intellectual capital and organizational organic structure in knowledge society: How are these concepts related? Int J Inf Manag 31(1):88–95Google Scholar
  61. Santos-Vijande ML, López-Sánchez JÁ, Trespalacios JA (2012) How organizational learning affects a firm’s flexibility, competitive strategy, and performance. J Bus Res 65(8):1079–1089Google Scholar
  62. Senge P (1990) Fifth discipline. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Sessa VI, London M, Pingor C, Gullu B, Patel J (2011) Adaptive, generative, and transformative learning in project teams. Team Perform Manag Int J 17(3/4):146–167Google Scholar
  64. Slater SF, Narver JC (1995) Market orientation and the learning organisation. J Mark 59(3):63–74Google Scholar
  65. Slater SF, Narver JC (1999) Research notes and communications: market-oriented is more than being customer-led. Strateg Manag J 20(12):1165–1168Google Scholar
  66. Song M, Chen Y (2014) Organizational attributes, market growth, and product innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 31(6):1312–1329Google Scholar
  67. Sorescu AB, Spanjol J (2008) Innovation’s effect on firm value and risk: insights from consumer packaged goods. J Mark 72(2):114–132Google Scholar
  68. Sorescu AB, Chandy RK, Prabhu JC (2003) Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: insights from pharmaceuticals. J Mark 67(4):82–102Google Scholar
  69. Stringer R (2000) How to manage radical innovation. Calif Manag Rev 42(4):70–88Google Scholar
  70. Su Z, Chen J, Wang D (2018) Organisational structure and managerial innovation: the mediating effect of cross-functional integration. Technol Anal Strateg Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1495324 Google Scholar
  71. Vera D, Crossan M (2004) Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Acad Manag Rev 29(2):222–240Google Scholar
  72. Wang CL, Chugh H (2014) Entrepreneurial learning: past research and future challenges. Int J Manag Rev 16(1):24–61Google Scholar
  73. Yang KP, Chou C, Chiu YJ (2014) How unlearning affects radical innovation: the dynamics of social capital and slack resources. Technol Forecast Soc Change 87:152–163Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Administración de Empresas y MarketingUniversitat Jaume ICastellón de la PlanaSpain

Personalised recommendations