Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 1093–1120 | Cite as

Influence of alliance portfolio diversity on innovation performance: the role of internal capabilities of value creation

  • Doohee Chung
  • Marco Jinhwan Kim
  • Jina KangEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, we suggest a new perspective on the linkage between alliance portfolio diversity and innovation performance based on a contingency approach. Using a longitudinal data set on alliance portfolios and patents of 182 firms in the U.S. manufacturing industries, we examined that alliance portfolio diversity has a U-shaped relationship with firm-level innovation. Internal value creation capabilities in terms of routine and ability are found to moderate the relationship between alliance portfolio diversity and innovation performance: organizational search routine strengthens the relationship of alliance portfolio diversity and innovation performance while technological capabilities weaken and flip the relationship.

Keywords

Alliance portfolio diversity Innovation performance Internal capabilities 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90B50 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Institute of Engineering Research at Seoul National University provided research facilities for this work.

References

  1. Afuah A (2002) Mapping technological capabilities into product markets and competitive advantage: the case of cholesterol drugs. Strateg Manag J 23(2):171–179Google Scholar
  2. Ahuja G (2000) The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strateg Manag J 21(3):317–343Google Scholar
  3. Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strateg Manag J 22(6–7):521–543Google Scholar
  4. Asgari N, Singh K, Mitchell W (2017) Alliance portfolio reconfiguration following a technological discontinuity. Strateg Manag J 38(5):1062–1081Google Scholar
  5. Bae J, Gargiulo M (2004) Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Acad Manag J 47:843–859Google Scholar
  6. Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS (2000) Don’t go it alone: alliance networks and startups performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strateg Manag J 21:267–294Google Scholar
  7. Bos B, Faems D, Noseleit F (2017) Alliance concentration in multinational companies: examining alliance portfolios, firm structure, and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 38(11):2298–2309Google Scholar
  8. Bowman EH, Hurry D (1993) Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Acad Manag Rev 18(4):760–782Google Scholar
  9. Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Adm Sci Q 42:1–34Google Scholar
  10. Burt RS (1992) Structural holes-The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatterjee S, Hadi A, Price B (2000) The use of regression analysis by example. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen YS, Shih CY, Chang CH (2012) The effects of related and unrelated technological diversification on innovation performance and corporate growth in the Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Scientometrics 92(1):117–134Google Scholar
  13. Chung D, Cho TS, Kang J (2015) TMT knowledge specificity and search behavior on innovation: a contingency perspective. Acad Manag Proc 2015:11499Google Scholar
  14. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152Google Scholar
  15. Cui AS, O’Connor G (2012) Alliance portfolio resource diversity and firm innovation. J Mark 76(4):24–43Google Scholar
  16. De Man AP, Duysters G (2005) Collaboration and innovation: a review of the effects of mergers, acquisitions and alliances on innovation. Technovation 25(12):1377–1387Google Scholar
  17. Deeds DL, Rothaermel FT (2003) Honeymoons and liabilities: the relationship between age and performance in research and development alliances. J Prod Innov Manag 20(6):468–484Google Scholar
  18. Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Adm Sci Q 29:52–73Google Scholar
  19. Dollinger MJ (1995) Entrepreneurship: strategies and resources. Irwin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. Doz YL, Hamel G (1998) Alliance advantage: the art of creating value through partnering. Harvard Business Press, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  21. Dugal M, Gopalakrishnan S (2000) Environmental volatility: a reassessment of the construct. Int J Organ Anal 8(4):401–424Google Scholar
  22. Duysters G, Lokshin B (2011) Determinants of alliance portfolio complexity and its effect on innovative performance of companies. J Prod Innov Manag 28(4):570–585Google Scholar
  23. Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1996) Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ Sci 7(2):136–150Google Scholar
  24. Faems D, Janssens M, Madhok A, Van Looy B (2008) Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application. Acad Manag J 51(6):1053–1078Google Scholar
  25. Faems D, Janssens M, Neyens I (2012) Alliance portfolios and innovation performance connecting structural and managerial perspectives. Group Organ Manag 37(2):241–268Google Scholar
  26. Flynn FJ, Chatman JA, Spataro SE (2001) Getting to know you: the influence of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different people in organizations. Adm Sci Q 46:414–442Google Scholar
  27. Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: cognitive and experiential search. Adm Sci Q 45(1):113–137Google Scholar
  28. Goerzen A, Beamish PW (2005) The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 26(4):333–354Google Scholar
  29. Greve HR, Taylor A (2000) Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: shifts in organizational cognition and search. Adm Sci Q 45:54–80Google Scholar
  30. Gulati R (2007) Managing network resources: alliances, affiliations and other relational assets. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Gulati R, Singh H (1998) The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Adm Sci Q 43:781–814Google Scholar
  32. Gupta AK, Tesluk PE, Taylor MS (2007) Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organ Sci 18(6):885–897Google Scholar
  33. Haans RF, Pieters C, He ZL (2016) Thinking about U: theorizing and testing U-and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strateg Manag J 37(7):1177–1195Google Scholar
  34. Hagedoorn J (1993) Interorganizational modes of cooperation. Strateg Manag J 14:371–385Google Scholar
  35. Hagedoorn J, Duysters G (2002) External sources of innovative capabilities: the preferences for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions. J Manag Stud 39:167–188Google Scholar
  36. Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1199–1228Google Scholar
  37. Hausman JA, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938Google Scholar
  38. Heiman BA, Nickerson JA (2004) Empirical evidence regarding the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations. Manag Decis Econ 25(6–7):401–420Google Scholar
  39. Helfat CE (1994) Firm-specificity in corporate applied R&D. Organ Sci 5:173–184Google Scholar
  40. Henderson R, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strateg Manag J 15(S1):63–84Google Scholar
  41. Isobe T, Makino S, Montgomery DB (2000) Resource commitment, entry timing, and market performance of foreign direct investments in emerging economies: the case of Japanese international joint ventures in China. Acad Manag J 43(3):468–484Google Scholar
  42. Jacquemin AP, Berry CH (1979) Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. J Ind Econ 27:359–369Google Scholar
  43. Jiang RJ, Tao QT, Santoro MD (2010) Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 31(10):1136–1144Google Scholar
  44. Jung HJ, Jeongsik L (2016) The quest for originality: a new typology of knowledge search and breakthrough inventions. Acad Manag J 59(5):1725–1753Google Scholar
  45. Kale P, Dyer JH, Singh H (2002) Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strateg Manag J 23(8):747–767Google Scholar
  46. Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad Manag J 45(6):1183–1194Google Scholar
  47. Kelly D, Amburgey TL (1991) Organizational inertia and momentum: a dynamic model of strategic change. Acad Manag J 34(3):591–612Google Scholar
  48. Kim JW, Higgins MC (2007) Where do alliances come from? The effects of upper echelons on alliance formation. Res Policy 36(4):499–514Google Scholar
  49. Kim SK, Arthurs JD, Sahaym A, Cullen JB (2013) Search behavior of the diversified firm: the impact of fit on innovation. Strateg Manag J 34:999–1009Google Scholar
  50. Koka BR, Prescott JE (2008) Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strateg Manag J 29(6):639–661Google Scholar
  51. Koput KW (1997) A chaotic model of innovative search: some answers, many questions. Organ Sci 8(5):528–542Google Scholar
  52. Kumar V, Kumar U, Persaud A (1999) Building technological capability through importing technology: the case of Indonesian manufacturing industry. J Technol Transf 24(1):81–96Google Scholar
  53. Lavie D (2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: a study of value creation and appropriation in the US software industry. Strateg Manag J 28(12):1187–1212Google Scholar
  54. Lavie D, Miller SR (2008) Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ Sci 19(4):623–646Google Scholar
  55. Lee L, Wong PK (2009) Firms’ innovative performance: the mediating role of innovative collaborations. MPRA paper 16193. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/16193/. Accessed 5 May 2016
  56. Lee D, Kirkpatrick-Husk K, Madhavan R (2017) Diversity in alliance portfolios and performance outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Manag 43(5):1472–1497Google Scholar
  57. Leeuw T, Lokshin B, Duysters G (2013) Returns to alliance portfolio diversity: the relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity. J Bus Res 67(9):1839–1849Google Scholar
  58. Li Y, Vanhaverbeke W, Schoenmakers W (2008) Exploration and exploitation in innovation: reframing the interpretation. Creat Innov Manag 17(2):107–126Google Scholar
  59. Luo X, Deng L (2009) Do birds of a feather flock higher? The effects of partner similarity on innovation in strategic alliances in knowledge-intensive industries. J Manag Stud 46(6):1005–1030Google Scholar
  60. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87Google Scholar
  61. March JG (1996) Continuity and change in theories of organizational action. Adm Sci Q 41:278–287Google Scholar
  62. March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Mariti P, Smiley RH (1983) Co-operative agreements and the organization of industry. The Journal of industrial economics 31:437–451Google Scholar
  64. Martin X, Mitchell W (1998) The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market. Res Policy 26(7):753–771Google Scholar
  65. McCutchen WW, Swamidass PM (1996) Effect of R&D expenditures and funding strategies on the market value of biotech firms. J Eng Technol Manag 12(4):287–299Google Scholar
  66. Miller DJ (2006) Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 27:601–619Google Scholar
  67. Miller DJ, Fern MJ, Cardinal LB (2007) The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Acad Manag J 50(2):307–325Google Scholar
  68. Miotti L, Sachwald F (2003) Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Res Policy 32(8):1481–1499Google Scholar
  69. Morbey GK, Reithner RM (1990) How R&D affects sales growth, productivity and profitability. Res Technol Manag 33(3):11–14Google Scholar
  70. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  71. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models, vol 4. Irwin, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  72. Nooteboom B, Van Haverbeke W, Duysters G, Gilsing V, Van den Oord A (2007) Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Res Policy 36(7):1016–1034Google Scholar
  73. Oerlemans LA, Knoben J, Pretorius MW (2013) Alliance portfolio diversity, radical and incremental innovation: the moderating role of technology management. Technovation 33(6):234–246Google Scholar
  74. Ozcan P, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Acad Manag J 52(2):246–279Google Scholar
  75. Palepu K (1985) Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strateg Manag J 6(3):239–255Google Scholar
  76. Park G, Kim MJ, Kang J (2015) Competitive embeddedness: the impact of competitive relations among a firm’s current alliance partners on its new alliance formations. Int Bus Rev 24(2):196–208Google Scholar
  77. Parkhe A (1991) Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. J Int Bus Stud 22(4):579–601Google Scholar
  78. Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Adm Sci Q 44(1):1–28Google Scholar
  79. Poot T, Faems D, Vanhaverbeke W (2009) Toward a dynamic perspective on open innovation: a longitudinal assessment of the adoption of internal and external innovation strategies in the Netherlands. Int J Innov Manag 13(2):177–200Google Scholar
  80. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Adm Sci Q 41:116–145Google Scholar
  81. Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Manag Sci 49:290–311Google Scholar
  82. Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Manag Sci 49(6):751–766Google Scholar
  83. Rush H, Bessant J, Hobday M (2007) Assessing the technological capabilities of firms: developing a policy tool. R&D Manag 37(3):221–236Google Scholar
  84. Sampson RC (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad Manag J 50(2):364–386Google Scholar
  85. Sears J, Hoetker G (2014) Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strateg Manag J 35(1):48–67Google Scholar
  86. Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ Sci 16:522–536Google Scholar
  87. Snyder NH, Glueck WF (1982) Can environmental volatility be measured objectively? Acad Manag J 25(1):185–192Google Scholar
  88. Sobrero M, Roberts EB (2002) Strategic management of supplier–manufacturer relations in new product development. Res Policy 31(1):159–182Google Scholar
  89. Sorenson O, Rivkin JW, Fleming L (2006) Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res Policy 35(7):994–1017Google Scholar
  90. Srivastava MK, Gnyawali DR (2011) When do relational resources matter? Leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation. Acad Manag J 54(4):797–810Google Scholar
  91. Stuart TE, Podolny JM (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strateg Manag J 17:21–38Google Scholar
  92. Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Adm Sci Q 44(2):315–349Google Scholar
  93. Swaminathan V, Moorman C (2009) Marketing alliances, firm networks, and firm value creation. J Mark 73(5):52–69Google Scholar
  94. Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: opening the black box. Acad Manag Rev 34(4):689–709Google Scholar
  95. Teece DJ (1987) Technological change and the nature of the firm. Produced and distributed by center for research in management. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  96. Teece DJ (2006) Reflections on “profiting from innovation”. Res Policy 35(8):1131–1146Google Scholar
  97. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533Google Scholar
  98. Tosi H, Aldag R, Storey R (1973) On the measurement of the environment: an assessment of the Lawrence and Lorsch environmental uncertainty subscale. Adm Sci Q 18:27–36Google Scholar
  99. Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand J Econ 21:172–187Google Scholar
  100. Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A (1997) University vs. corporate patents: a window on the basicness of innovations. Econ Innov New Technol 5:19–50Google Scholar
  101. Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm Sci Q 31:439–465Google Scholar
  102. Van de Ven A, Polley D, Garud D, Venkataraman S (1999) The innovation journey. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  103. Van de Vrande V (2013) Balancing your technology-sourcing portfolio: how sourcing mode diversity enhances innovative performance. Strateg Manag J 34(5):610–621Google Scholar
  104. Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW, De Boer M (1999) Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ Sci 10(5):551–568Google Scholar
  105. Vasudeva G, Anand J (2011) Unpacking absorptive capacity: a study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolios. Acad Manag J 54(3):611–623Google Scholar
  106. Von Hippel E (2007) Horizontal innovation networks? By and for users. Ind Corp Change 16(2):293–315Google Scholar
  107. Wadhwa A, Phelps C, Kotha S (2016) Corporate venture capital portfolios and firm innovation. J Bus Ventur 31(1):95–112Google Scholar
  108. Wales WJ, Parida V, Patel PC (2013) Too much of a good thing? Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Strateg Manag J 34(5):622–633Google Scholar
  109. Wang L, Zajac EJ (2007) Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations. Strateg Manag J 28(13):1291–1317Google Scholar
  110. Wassmer U (2010) Alliance portfolios: a review and research agenda. J Manag 36(1):141–171Google Scholar
  111. Wassmer U, Dussauge P (2011) Value creation in alliance portfolios: the benefits and costs of network resource interdependencies. Eur Manag Rev 8:47–64Google Scholar
  112. Wassmer U, Dussauge P (2012) Network resource stocks and flows: how do alliance portfolios affect the value of new alliance formations? Strateg Manag J 33(7):871–883Google Scholar
  113. Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strateg Manag J 24(10):991–995Google Scholar
  114. Wuyts S, Dutta S (2014) Benefiting from alliance portfolio diversity the role of past internal knowledge creation strategy. J Manag 40(6):1653–1674Google Scholar
  115. Wuyts S, Dutta S, Stremersch S (2004) Portfolios of interfirm agreements in technology-intensive markets: consequences for innovation and profitability. J Mark 68(2):88–100Google Scholar
  116. Zaheer A, Bell GG (2005) Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strateg Manag J 26(9):809–825Google Scholar
  117. Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acade Manag Rev 27(2):185–203Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Global Entrepreneurship and ICTHandong Global UniversityPohangSouth Korea
  2. 2.Technology Management Economics and Policy Program (TEMEP)Seoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations