Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 327–345 | Cite as

When and how often to externally commercialize technologies? a critical review of outbound open innovation

  • Roland HelmEmail author
  • Herbert Endres
  • Stefan Hüsig
Original Paper

Abstract

Since the 1990s, external technology commercialization (ETC) has become increasingly relevant in business management practice and the academic literature. Frequently, ETC is praised as highly important and is often even considered an important competence of a progressive firm. To date, research has mainly focused on the opportunities and advantages of ETC, while risks and costs tend to be ignored or downplayed. This paper aims to review ETC critically. We stress that ETC might not only cause operating costs but also requires additional human resources. From a strategic perspective, we propose that ETC may result in the loss of competitive advantages through the disclosure of internal knowledge (or areas the firm is working in) or through the suboptimal allocation of R&D resources, and thereby affects a firm’s performance negatively. Finally, we propose specific implications for management and research on when and how often companies should practice ETC, and illustrate related practical experience by a case study. We thereby propose an inversely U-shaped relationship between ETC’s intensity and the firm’s profit contribution.

Keywords

External technology commercialization Outbound open innovation R&D management Technology management 

Mathematics Subject Classification

91 

References

  1. Arzubiaga U, Maseda A, Iturralde T (2017) Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: the moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management. Rev Manag Sci. (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  2. Bianchi M, Chiaroni D, Chiesa V, Frattini F (2011) Organizing for external technology commercialization: evidence from a multiple case study in the pharmaceutical industry. R&D Manag 41:120–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birkenmeier B (2003) External deployment of technologies. Technology and Innovation Management on the move. Tschirky Verlag Industrielle Organisation, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouncken RB, Plüschke BD, Pesch R, Kraus S (2016) Entrepreneurial orientation in vertical alliances: joint product innovation and learning from allies. Rev Manag Sci 10:381–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassiman B, Valentini G (2016) Open Innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary? Strateg Manag J 37:1034–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Dowling M, Helm R (2011) Licencing as a commercialisation strategy under different institutional contexts: a comparative empirical analysis of German and Chinese biotechnology firms. Int J Bus Glob 7:131–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng C, Huizingh E (2014) When is open innovation beneficial? the role of strategic orientation. J Prod Innov Manag 31:1235–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chesbrough H (2003a) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard University Press, Boston and MassGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesbrough H (2003b) The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 44:35–41Google Scholar
  10. Chesbrough H (2007) Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48:22–28Google Scholar
  11. Chesbrough H (2011) Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  12. Chesbrough H, Brunswicker S (2014) A fad or a phenomenon? the adoption of open innovation practices in large firms. Res Technol Manage 57:16–25Google Scholar
  13. Chesbrough H, Crowther A (2006) Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Manag 36:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chesbrough H, Garman A (2009) How open innovation can help you cope in lean times. Harvard Bus Rev 87:68–76Google Scholar
  15. Cooper RG, Edgett SJ (2010) Developing a product innovation and technology strategy for your business. Res Technol Manag 53:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dahlander L, Gann D (2010) How open is innovation? Res Policy 39:699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dowling M, Helm R (2006) Product development success through cooperation: a study of entrepreneurial firms. Technovation 26:483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowling M, Helm R (2008) Licensing as a commercialisation strategy: an empirical analysis of german biotechnology firms. Manag Innov Entrep 4:94–103Google Scholar
  19. Dowling M, Hüsig S (2002) Technologiestrategie. In: Specht D, Möhrle MG (eds) Gabler Lexikon Technologie Management—Management von Innovationen und neuen Technologien im Unternehmen. Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler GmbH, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  20. Easterby-Smith M, Lyles M, Tsang E (2008) Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: current themes and future prospects. J Manag Stud 45:677–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eisenhardt K, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Enkel E, Gassmann O, Chesbrough H (2009) Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management 39:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Faems D, de Visser M, Andries P, Van Looy B (2010) Technology alliance portfolios and financial performance: value-enhancing and cost-increasing effects of open innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 27:785–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ford D (1985) The management and marketing of technology. In: Lamb R, Shrivastava P (eds) Advances in strategic management. JAI Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Fosfuri A (2006) The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strateg Manag J 27:1141–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frishammar J, Ericsson K, Patel P (2015) The dark side of knowledge transfer: exploring knowledge leakage in joint R&D projects. Technovation 41–42:75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gläser J, Laudel G (2010) Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltanalyse, 4th edn. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gleave S, Feess E (2016) Fixed fee licensing for cost-reducing technologies: Should innovators reveal their private information? Rev Manag Sci 10:778–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Granstrand O (2000) Corporate innovation systems: a comparative study of multi-technology corporations in Japan, Sweden and the USA. Chalmers University, GothenburgGoogle Scholar
  30. Helm R, Kloyer M (2004) Controlling contractual exchange risks in R&D interfirm cooperation: an empirical Study. Res Policy 33:1103–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huizingh E (2011) Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation 31:2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hung K, Chou C (2013) The impact of open innovation on firm performance: the moderating effects of internal F&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation 33:368–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hüsig S (2006) Institutionalisierte Vorentwicklung für radikale Innovationen—Dargestellt am Beispiel der Mannesmann Pilotentwicklung und der LKW-Mauttechnik. Duisburg: WiKu-Verlag—Verlag für Wissenschaft und KulturGoogle Scholar
  34. ideaCONNECTION (2017). http://www.ideaconnection.com. Accessed 10th July 2017
  35. Inauen M, Schenker-Wicki A (2011) The impact of outside-in open innovation on innovation performance. Eur J Innov Manag 14:496–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. INNOCENTIVE (2017). http://www.innocentive.com. Accessed 10th July 2017
  37. Kale P, Dyer J, Singh H (2002) Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strateg Manag J 23:747–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim H-S, Choi S-Y (2014) Technological alliance portfolio configuration and firm performance. Rev Manag Sci 8:541–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kline D (2003) Sharing the corporate crown jewels. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 44:89–93Google Scholar
  40. Kloyer M, Helm R, Burr W (2007) Compensation preferences of R&D-suppliers: some empirical results. Int J Technol Manag 40:371–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koruna S (2004) External technology commercialization—policy guidelines. Int J Technol Manag 27:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lanxess AG Firm Website (2017). http://www.lanxess.com/en/corporate/home/. Accessed 5th July 2017
  43. Latham G, Locke E (2006) Enhancing the benefits and overcoming the pitfalls of goal setting. Org Dyn 35:332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for Innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strateg Manag J 27:131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laursen K, Salter A (2014) The paradox of openness: appropriability, external search and collaboration. Res Policy 43:867–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lichtenthaler U (2006) Leveraging knowledge assets: success factors of external technology commercialization. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  47. Lichtenthaler U (2007) Understanding the determinants of external technology commercialization. In: Ernst H, Gemünden HG (eds) Open innovation between and within organizations. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft Special Issue 4:21–45Google Scholar
  48. Lichtenthaler U (2009) Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: examining environmental influences. R&D Manag 39:317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lichtenthaler U (2010) Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: finding the right ‘job’ for your technology. Technovation 30:429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lichtenthaler U (2015) A note on outbound open innovation and firm performance. R&D Manag 45:606–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lichtenthaler U, Ernst H (2007) External technology commercialization in large firms: results of a quantitative benchmarking study. R&D Manag 37:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. March J (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manag 34:375–409Google Scholar
  54. Rothwell R (1992) Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Manag 22:221–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scapens RW (2004) Doing case study research. In: Humphrey C, Lee B (eds) The real life guide to accounting research. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 257–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stüer C, Hüsig S, Biala S (2010) How to create and sustain an open and radical innovation capability in the fuzzy front end? the case of vodafone R&D Germany and selected ongoing radical innovation projects. Int J Prod Dev 11:196–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. TOP 100 Award Website (2013). Top 100 German most innovative small and medium-sized firms 2013, http://www.top100-germany.com. Accessed 16th September 2016
  58. Trott P, Hartmann D (2009) Why “Open Innovation” is old wine in new Bottles. Int J Technol Manag 13:715–736Google Scholar
  59. Tschirky H, Koruna S, Lichtenthaler E (2004) Technology marketing: A firm’s core competence? Int J Technol Manag 27:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Von Hippel E (1986) Lead users. A source of novel product concepts. Manag Sci 32:791–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. West J, Gallagher S (2006) Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Manag 36:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1994) Revolution der Produktentwicklung: Spitzenleistungen in Schnelligkeit, Effizienz und Qualität durch dynamische Teams. Campus Verlag, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  63. Williamson O (1973) Markets and hierarchies: some elementary considerations. Am Econ Rev 63:316–325Google Scholar
  64. Yin R (2009) Case study research—design and methods, vol 5. Applied social research methods series. Thousand Oaks, SageGoogle Scholar
  65. Zook C, Allen J (2013) Profit from the core: a return to growth in turbulent times. Harvard Business Press, Boston and MassachusettsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Strategic Industrial MarketingUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Innovation Research and Technology ManagementChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations