Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 181–205 | Cite as

Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends

  • João J. M. FerreiraEmail author
  • Cristina I. Fernandes
  • Sascha KrausEmail author
Review Paper

Abstract

Using bibliometric techniques to identify connections between existing entrepreneurship studies, this article seeks to understand the scientific structure of entrepreneurship research and how entrepreneurship scholarship is organized. Co-citation data and quantitative approach were used to identify scientific publications, intellectual structures, and research trends interrelated with theories of innovative entrepreneurship. Data were gathered from the citations and co-citations found in the Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Science Citation Index, and Arts and Humanities Citation Index. Our research reveals six groups of underlying entrepreneurship theories: (1) knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, (2) creation and networks theory, (3) decision-making theory, (4) specialization of labor, (5) social entrepreneurship theory, and (6) entrepreneurship in the informal economy.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship theories Bibliometrics Citation analysis Multi-dimensional scaling analysis Cluster analysis Co-citations Article impact 

JEL Classification

L26 M10 M13 

References

  1. Acs ZJ (1984) The changing structure of the US economy: lessons from the steel industry. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs ZJ, Braunerhjelm P, Audretsch DB, Carlsson B (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 32(1):15–30Google Scholar
  3. Aldrich H (2012) The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: a personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship. Res Policy 41:1240–1248Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez SA, Barney JB (2007) Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strateg Entrep J 26(3):11–26Google Scholar
  5. Alvarez SA, Audretsch D, Link A (2016) Advancing our understanding of theory in entrepreneurship. Strateg Entrep J 10(3–4):3–4Google Scholar
  6. Amit R, Glosten L, Muller E (1993) Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research. J Manag Stud 30(5):815–834Google Scholar
  7. Arauzo JM, Manjón MC (2004) Firm size and geographical aggregation: an empirical appraisal in industrial location. Small Bus Econ 22:299–312Google Scholar
  8. Audretsch DB (1995) Innovation and industry evolution. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2007) The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. J Manag Stud 44(7):1242–1254Google Scholar
  10. Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE (2005) Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Res Policy 34(8):1191–1202Google Scholar
  11. Audretsch DB, Bönte W, Keilbach M (2008) Entrepreneurship capital and its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance. J Bus Ventur 23(6):687–698Google Scholar
  12. Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy. Manag Sci 32(10):1231–1241Google Scholar
  13. Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120Google Scholar
  14. Barth F (1963) The role of the entrepreneur of social changes in northern Norway. Universitetsforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  15. Baumol WJ (1968) Entrepreneurship in economic theory. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 58(2):64–71Google Scholar
  16. Baumol WJ (1993) Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics - existence and bounds. J Bus Ventur 8(3):197–210Google Scholar
  17. Birch DL (1979) The job generation process. MIT Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Birley S (1985) The role of networks of cities and growth in regional urban. J Bus Ventur 1:107–117Google Scholar
  19. Bouncken RB, Gast J, Kraus S, Bogers M (2015) Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. RMS 9(3):577–601Google Scholar
  20. Brockhaus RH, Horwitz PS (1985) The psychology of the entrepreneur. In: Sexton DL, Smilor RW (eds) The art and science of entrepreneurship. Ballinger, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Bull I, Willard GE (1993) Towards a theory of entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur 8(3):183–195Google Scholar
  22. Burns BL, Barney JB, Angus RW, Herrick HN (2016) Enrolling stakeholders under conditions of risk and uncertainty. Strateg Entrep J 10(1):97–106Google Scholar
  23. Busenitz LW, West GP, Shepherd D, Nelson T, Chandler GN, Zacharakis A (2003) Entrepreneurship research in emergence: past trends and future directions. J Manag 29(3):285–308Google Scholar
  24. Busenitz LW, Plummer LA, Klotz AC, Shahzad A, Rhoads K (2014) Entrepreneurship research (1985–2009) and the emergence of opportunities. Entrep Theory Pract 38(5):981–1245Google Scholar
  25. Bygrave WD (1993) Theory building in the entrepreneurship paradigm. J Bus Ventur 8(3):255–280Google Scholar
  26. Cantillon R (1755) Essay on the nature of trade in general. Henry Higgs, London (edition and translation 1959) Google Scholar
  27. Carlsson B, Braunerhjelm P, McKelvey M, Olofsson C, Persson L, Ylinenpää H (2013) The evolving domain of entrepreneursip research. Small Bus Econ 41:913–930Google Scholar
  28. Casson M (1982) The entrepreneur: an economic theory. Barnes & Noble Books, TotowaGoogle Scholar
  29. Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. The MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  30. Chandler AD (1990) Scale and scope: the dynamics of industrial capitalism. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Clark JB (1892) Insurance and business profits. Q J Econ 7:45–54Google Scholar
  32. Di Guardo MC, Harrigan KR (2012) Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: a co-citation analysis. J Technol Transf 37:789–811Google Scholar
  33. Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manag Sci 35:1504–1511Google Scholar
  34. Douglas EJ, Shepherd DA (2000) Entrepreneurship as a utility maximizing response. J Bus Ventur 15(3):231–251Google Scholar
  35. Drucker PF (1985) Innovarion and enrrepreneurship. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Ferreira J, Fernandes C, Ratten V (2016) A co-citation bibliometric analysis of strategic management research. Scientometrics 109(1):1–32Google Scholar
  37. Foss NJ, Klein PG, Kor YY, Mahoney JT (2008) Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource-based view: toward a new synthesis. Strateg Entrep J 2(1):73–94Google Scholar
  38. Frank H, Landström H (2015) What makes entrepreneurship research interesting? Reflections on strategies to overcome the rigour–relevance gap. Entrep Reg Dev 28(1–2):51–75Google Scholar
  39. Gartner WB (1985) A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Acad Manag Rev 10(4):696–706Google Scholar
  40. Gartner WB (1990) What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? J Bus Ventur 5:15–28Google Scholar
  41. Gartner WB, Shane SA (1995) Measuring entrepreneurship over time. J Bus Ventur 10(4):283–301Google Scholar
  42. Gartner WB, Davidsson P, Zahra S (2006) Are you talking to me? The nature of community in entrepreneurship scholarship. Entrep Theory Pract 30(3):321–331Google Scholar
  43. Geertz C (1963) Peddlers and princes. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. Grégorie D, Noël M, Déry R, Béchard J-P (2006) Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? a co-citation analysis of frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 1981–2004. Entrep Theory Pract 30(3):333–373Google Scholar
  45. Hawley FB (1892) The fundamental error of Kapital and Kapitalzins. Q J Econ 6:280–307Google Scholar
  46. Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530Google Scholar
  47. Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Herron L, Robinson RB (1993) A structural model of the effects of entrepreneurial characteristics on venture performance. J Bus Ventur 8(3):281–294Google Scholar
  49. Hjorth D, Jones C, Gartner WB (2008) Introduction for recreating/recontextualising entrepreneurship. Scand J Manag 24:81–84Google Scholar
  50. Holmes TJ, Schmitz JA (1990) A theory of entrepreneurship and its application to the to the study of business transfers. J Polit Econ 98(2):265–294Google Scholar
  51. Katz J (2003) The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education 1876–1999. J Bus Ventur 18:293–300Google Scholar
  52. Keyhani M, Lévesque M (2016) The equilibrating and disequilibrating effects of entrepreneurship: revisiting the central premises. Strateg Entrep J 10(1):65–88Google Scholar
  53. Kihlstrom RE, Laffont J (1979) A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. J Polit Econ 87(4):719–748Google Scholar
  54. Kirchoff BA, Phillips BD (1988) The effect of firm formation and growth on job creation in the United States. J Bus Ventur 11:133–149Google Scholar
  55. Kirzner I (1973) Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  56. Kirzner I (1985) Discovery and the capitalist process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  57. Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  58. Kraus S (2011) State-of-the-art of current research in international entrepreneurship: a citation analysis. Afr J Bus Manag 5(3):1020–1038Google Scholar
  59. Kraus S, Rigtering C (2010) Corporate entrepreneurship as a company philosophy: the case of “&Samhoud”. Int J Entrep Innov 11(3):245–249Google Scholar
  60. Kraus S, Filser M, Eggers F, Hills GE, Hultman CM (2012) The entrepreneurial marketing domain: a citation and co-citation analysis. J Res Mark Entrep 14(1):6–26Google Scholar
  61. Kraus S, Filser M, O’Dwyer M, Shaw E (2014) Social entrepreneurship: an exploratory citation analysis. RMS 8(2):275–292Google Scholar
  62. Kraus S, Meier F, Niemand T (2016) Experimental methods in entrepreneurship research: the status quo. Int J Entrep Behav Res 22(6):958–983Google Scholar
  63. Kuechle G, Boulu-Reshef B, Carr SD (2016) Prediction- and control-based strategies in entrepreneurship: the role of information. Strateg Entrep J 10(1):43–64Google Scholar
  64. Kuskova VV, Podsakoff NP, Podsakoff PM (2011) Effects of theoretical contribution, methodological rigor, and journal quality, on the impact of scale development articles in the field of entrepreneurship. Strateg Entrep J 5(1):10–36Google Scholar
  65. Landström H (2005) Pioneers in entrepreneurship and small business research. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Landström H, Harirchi G, Aström F (2012) Entrepreneurship: exploring the knowledge base. Res Policy 41(7):1154–1181Google Scholar
  67. Lawani S (1981) Bibliometrics: its theoretical foundations, methods and applications. Libri 31(4):294–315Google Scholar
  68. Leibenstein H (1968) Entrepreneurship and development. Am Econ Rev 58(2):72–83Google Scholar
  69. Lipset SM (1967) Values, education, and entrepreneurship. In: Lipset SM, Solari A (eds) Elites in Latin America. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  70. Low MB (2001) The adolescence of entrepreneurship research: specification of purpose. Entrep Theory Pract 24(4):17–39Google Scholar
  71. Markman GD, Phan PH, Balkin DB, Gianiodis PT (2005) Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. J Bus Ventur 20(2):241–263Google Scholar
  72. McClelland DC (1961) The achieving society. D. Van Nostrand Company Inc, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  73. Miner JB, Raju NS (2004) Risk propensity differences between managers and entrepreneurs and between low- and high-growth entrepreneurs: a reply in a more conservative vein. J Appl Psychol 89(1):3–13Google Scholar
  74. Mises L (1949) Human action: a treatise on economics. Laissez Faire, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  75. Piore M, Sabel C (1984) The second industrial divide. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Pryor C, Webb JW, Ireland RD, Ketchen D (2016) Toward an integration of the behavioral and cognitive influences on the entrepreneurship process. Strateg Entrep J 10(1):21–42Google Scholar
  77. Schildt HA, Henri A, Zahra S, Antti Sillanpää A (2006) Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: a co-citation analysis. Entrep Theory Pract 30(3):399–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00126.x Google Scholar
  78. Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  79. Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Shane SA (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ Sci 11(4):448–469Google Scholar
  81. Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manag Rev 25(1):217–226Google Scholar
  82. Small H (1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci 24:265–269Google Scholar
  83. Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Methuen and Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith LC (1981) Citation analysis. Libr Trends 30(1):83–106Google Scholar
  85. Storey DJ (1994) Employment, Chap. 6. In: Storey DJ (ed) Understanding the small business sector. Routledge, London, pp 160–203Google Scholar
  86. Suddaby R, Bruton G, Si S (2014) Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. J Bus Ventur 30(1):1–10Google Scholar
  87. Teixeira AC (2011) Mapping the (in)visible col- lege(s) in the field of entrepreneurship. Scientometrics 89:1–36Google Scholar
  88. Thurik AR, Wennekers A (2004) Entrepreneurship, small business and economic growth. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 11(1):140–149Google Scholar
  89. Van Ness RK, Seifert CF (2016) A theoretical analysis of the role of characteristics in entrepreneurial propensity. Strateg Entrep J 10(1):89–96Google Scholar
  90. van Stel AJ (2006) Empirical analysis of entrepreneurship and economic growth. International studies in entrepreneurship series, 13. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  91. Verbeek A, Debackere K, Luwel M, Zimmermann E (2002) Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology - I: the multiple uses of bibliometric indicators”. Int J Manag Rev 4(2):179–211Google Scholar
  92. Vesper K (1982) Introduction and summary of entrepreneurial research. In: Kent CA, Sexton DL, Vesper KH (eds) Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp xxxi–xxxviii). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  93. Walker FA (1876) The wages question. Henry Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  94. Waltman L, Van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM (2010) A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J Informetr 4(4):629–635Google Scholar
  95. Webb JW, Tihanyi L, Ireland RD, Sirmon DG (2009) You say illegal, I say legitimate: entrepreneurship in the informal economy. Acad Manag Rev 34(3):492–510Google Scholar
  96. Weerawardena J, Mort GS (2006) Investigating social entrepreneurship: a multidimensional model. J World Bus 41(1):21–35Google Scholar
  97. Welsch HP (2004) Entrepreneurship: the way ahead. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  98. Welter F, Lasch F (2008) Entrepreneurship research in Europe: taking stock and looking forward. Entrep Theory Pract 32(2):241–248Google Scholar
  99. Welter C, Mauer R, Wuebker R (2016) Bridging behavioral models and theoretical concepts: effectuation and bricolage in the opportunity creation framework. Strateg Entrep J 10(1):5–20Google Scholar
  100. Westhead P, Wright M (2000) Advances in entrepreneurship, vol I. Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  101. White HD, Grifith BC (1981) Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. J Am Soc Inf Sci 32(3):163–171Google Scholar
  102. White HD, McCain KW (1998) Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. J Am Soc Inf Sci 49(4):327–355Google Scholar
  103. Xi JM, Kraus S, Kellermanns F, Filser M (2015) Mapping the field of family business research: past trends and future directions. Int Entrep Manag J 11(1):113–132Google Scholar
  104. Zahra SA (2005) Entrepreneurship and disciplinary scholarship: return to the fountainhead. In: Alvarez SA, Agarwal R, Sorenson O (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Springer, pp 253–268Google Scholar
  105. Zahra SA (2007) Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. J Bus Ventur 22:443–452Google Scholar
  106. Zitt M, Bassecoulard E (1994) Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis. Scientometrics 30:333–351Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management and Economics DepartmentUniversity of Beira Interior & NECE - Research Unit in Business SciencesCovilhãPortugal
  2. 2.Intituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco & NECE - Research Unit in Business SciencesCovilhãPortugal
  3. 3.Institute for Entrepreneurship, Fürst-Franz-Josef-StrasseUniversity of LiechtensteinVaduzLiechtenstein

Personalised recommendations