Advertisement

What are the current ‘top five’ perceived educational needs of Irish general practitioners?

  • Stephanie DowlingEmail author
  • Jason Last
  • Henry Finnegan
  • Kieran O’Connor
  • Walter Cullen
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Doctors’ continuing medical educational and professional development (CME and CPD) needs are known to be strongly influenced by national and local contextual characteristics. A crucial step in the development of effective education and training programmes is the assessment of learner needs.

Methods

A national needs assessment was conducted among general practitioners (GPs) in the Republic of Ireland who attended continuing medical education small group learning meetings (CME-SGL) in late 2017. Doctors completed a self-administered anonymous three-page questionnaire which gathered demographic data and asked them to choose their ‘top five’ perceived educational needs from separate lists of topics for CME and CPD.

Results

There were 1669 responses (98% of monthly attendance). The topics most commonly identified as a priority for further CME were prescribing (updates/therapeutics), elderly medicine, management of common chronic conditions, dermatology, and patient safety/medical error. The most commonly selected CPD topics were applying evidence-based guidelines to practice, appraising performance/conducting practice audits, coping with change, and managing risk and legal medicine. There was no difference between urban and rural practice settings regarding the most commonly chosen topics in each category; however, more rural GPs selected pre-hospital/emergency care as one of their ‘top five’.

Conclusion

Our findings identified priority areas where CME and CPD for GPs in Ireland should focus. The topics selected may reflect the changing nature of general practice, which increasingly requires delivery of care to an ageing population with more multi-morbidity and chronic disease management, while trying to apply evidence-based medicine and consider patient safety issues. CME/CPD programmes need to adapt accordingly.

Keywords

Continuing medical education Continuing professional development Education needs General practice 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by ICGP Career Support Grant.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Stephanie Dowling received a research grant from the ICGP called the ICGP Career Support Grant. No other funds were received by any of the authors for this study. There is no conflict of interest in this study.

Ethical approval

ICGP Ethical approval was received for this study. GPs were questioned only and no procedures were performed for this study. (All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.)

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Davis D (1998) Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. Int J Psychiatry Med 28(1):21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peck C, McCall M, McLaren B, Rotem T (2000) Continuing medical education and continuing professional development: international comparisons. BMJ 320(7232):432–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holm HA (1998) Quality issues in continuing medical education. Br Med J 316(7131):621–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayes SF (2005) Where next with revalidation?: make CME and CPD compulsory with support of audit and mentoring. BMJ 331(7512):352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lake J (2009) Doctors in difficulty and revalidation: where next for the medical profession? Med Educ 43(7):611–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    MacWalter G, McKay J, Bowie P (2016) Utilisation of internet resources for continuing professional development: a cross-sectional survey of general practitioners in Scotland. BMC Med Educ 16:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis N, Davis D, Bloch R (2008) Continuing medical education: AMEE education guide no 35. Med Teach 30:652–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fox RD, Bennett NL (1998) Continuing medical education: learning and change: implications for continuing medical education. BMJ 316(7129):466–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    HOFFBRAND BI (2001) The effectiveness of continuing professional development. Postgrad Med J 77(910):551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grant J (2002) Learning needs assessment: assessing the need. BMJ 324(7330):156–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Curran V, Hatcher L, Kirby F (2000) CME needs of rural physicians: how do we compare to our urban colleagues? Can J Rural Med 5(3):131Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allan JA, Schaefer D (2005) Do the learning needs of rural and urban general practitioners differ? Aust J Rural Health 13(6):337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Curran VR, Keegan D, Parsons W, Rideout G (2007) A comparative analysis of the perceived continuing medical education needs of a cohort of rural and urban Canadian family physicians. Can J Rural Med 12(3):161–166Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maher B, O'Neill R, Faruqui A, Bergin C, Horgan M, Bennett D, et al. (2018) Survey of Irish general practitioners’ preferences for continuing professional development. Educ Prim Care 29(1):13–21Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O'Kelly M TC, O'Kelly F, Ni Shuilleabhain A, O'Dowd T (2016) Structure of General PRactice in Ireland 1982-2015. https://www.icgp.ie/mwg-internal/de5fs23hu73ds/progress?id=m85KNhXbcbXMF_OLjfV7qvUN_0-tCPOtkh_wbQIrMJI,&dl
  16. 16.
    Dowling S, Last J, Finnigan H, Cullen W (2018) Continuing education for general practitioners working in rural practice: a review of the literature. Educ Prim Care 29(3):151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gabhainn SN, Murphy AW, Kelleher C (2001) A national general practice census: characteristics of rural general practices. Fam Pract 18(6):622–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bourke J, Roper S (2012) In with the new: the determinants of prescribing innovation by general practitioners in Ireland. Eur J Health Econ 13(4):393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Informatics IIfH (2012) The global use of medicines: outlook through 2016. IMS Health, Informatics IIfH, DanburyGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hunt LM, Kreiner M, Brody H (2012) The changing face of chronic illness management in primary care: a qualitative study of underlying influences and unintended outcomes. Ann Fam Med 10(5):452–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gurwitz JH (2004) Polypharmacy: a new paradigm for quality drug therapy in the elderly? Arch Intern Med 164(18):1957–1959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moynihan R, Glasziou P, Woloshin S, Schwartz L, Santa J, Godlee F (2013) Winding back the harms of too much medicine. BMJ 346:f1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kjaer NK, Steenstrup AP, Pedersen LB, Halling A (2014) Continuous professional development for GPs: experience from Denmark. Postgrad Med J 90(1065):383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Department of Health and Children (DOHC) (2008) Tackling chronic disease: a policy framework for the management of chronic diseases. http://hdl.handle.net/10147/45895
  25. 25.
    Behan W, Molony D, Beamer C, Cullen W (2013) Are Irish adult general practice consultation rates as low as official records suggest? A cross sectional study at six general practices. Ir Med J 106(10):297–299Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dennis SM, Zwar N, Griffiths R, Roland M, Hasan I, Powell Davies G et al (2008) Chronic disease management in primary care: from evidence to policy. Med J Aust 188(8 Suppl):S53–S56Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Holbrook A, Thabane L, Keshavjee K, Dolovich L, Bernstein B, Chan D, Troyan S, Foster G, Gerstein H, for the COMPETE II Investigators (2009) Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial. Cmaj 181(1–2):37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kjaer NK, Vedsted M, Hopner J (2017) A new comprehensive model for continuous professional development. Eur J Gen Pract 23(1):20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Onder G, Palmer K, Navickas R, Jureviciene E, Mammarella F, Strandzheva M et al (2015) Time to face the challenge of multimorbidity. A European perspective from the joint action on chronic diseases and promoting healthy ageing across the life cycle (JA-CHRODIS). Eur J Intern Med 26(3):157–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lopez DG, Hamdorf JM, Ward AM, Emery J (2006) Early trauma management skills in Australian general practitioners. ANZ J Surg 76(10):894–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaufman DM (2003) Applying educational theory in practice. BMJ 326(7382):213–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dent AW, Weiland TJ, Paltridge D (2008) Australasian emergency physicians: a learning and educational needs analysis. Part four: CPD topics desired by emergency physicians. Emerg Med Australas 20(3):260–266Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Medical Council (2011) Professional competence guidelines for doctors. Medical Council. http://hdl.handle.net/10147/233637

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College Dublin School of MedicineHealth Sciences Centre, UCDDublinIreland
  2. 2.Cappoquin Health CentreWest WaterfordIreland
  3. 3.Irish College of General Practice National CME DirectorIrish College of General PracticeDublinIreland
  4. 4.Public HealthSt Canices HospitalKilkennyIreland

Personalised recommendations