Polypropylene mesh and systemic side effects in inguinal hernia repair: current evidence
- 50 Downloads
Increasing awareness and regulatory body attention is directed towards the insertion of synthetic material for a variety of surgical procedures. This review aims to assess current evidence regarding systemic and auto-immune effects of polypropylene mesh insertion in hernia repair.
The electronic literature on systemic and auto-immune effects associated with mesh insertion was examined.
Foreign body reaction following mesh implantation initiates an acute inflammatory cellular response. Involved markers such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-10 and fibrinogen are increased in circulation in the presence of mesh but return to normal at 7 days post operatively. Oxidative degradation of implanted mesh is likely, but no evidence exists to support systemic absorption or resulting disease effects. Variable cytokine production in healthy hosts leading to unpredictable or overwhelming response to implanted biomaterial warrants further investigation. Clinical studies show no associated long-term systemic effects with mesh.
To date, there remains no evidence to link polypropylene mesh and systemic or auto-immune symptoms. Based on current evidence, the use of polypropylene mesh is supported.
KeywordsAutoimmune Hernia Mesh Systemic
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Rutegård M, Gümüsçü R, Stylianidis G, Nordin P, Nilsson E, Haapamäki M (2018) Chronic pain, discomfort, quality of life and impact on sex life after open inguinal hernia mesh repair: an expertise-based randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight and heavyweight mesh. Hernia 22(3):411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Beets GL, Oosterhuis KJ, Go PM, Baeten CG, Kootstra G (1997) Long term followup (12-15 years) of a randomized controlled trial comparing Bassini-Stetten, Shouldice, and high ligation with narrowing of the internal ring for primary inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 185:352–357Google Scholar
- 7.Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13(4):343–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Amato B, Moja L, Panico S, Persico G, Rispoli C, Rocco N, Moschetti I (2012) Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001543. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001543.pub4
- 10.Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/transvaginal-mesh/. Last accessed 02/03/2018
- 11.Singh N, Picha GJ, Hardas B, Schumacher A, Murphy DK (2017) Five-year safety data for more than 55,000 subjects following breast implantation: comparison of rare adverse event rates with silicone implants versus National Norms and saline implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(4):666–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.FDA (2014) Safety Communications-surgical mesh: FDA safety communication. https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/. Last accessed 03/03/2018
- 15.Akre J (2014) Autoimmune diseases and surgical mesh—causation or correlation? Available from: http://meshmedicaldevicenewsdesk.com/autoimmune-diseases-and-surgical-mesh-causation-or-correlation
- 16.https://hollislawfirm.com/case/hernia-mesh-lawsuit/ Last accessed 03/03/2018
- 26.Klosterhallfen B, Klinge U, Hermanns B, Schumpelick V (2000) Pathology of traditional surgical nets for hernia repair after long-term implantation in humans. Chirurg 71:43–51Google Scholar
- 28.Arnould JP, Eloy R, Weill-bousson M et al (1977) Resistance et tolerance biologique de 6 protheses inertes utilises dans la reparation de la paroi abdominale. J Chir 113:85–100Google Scholar
- 36.Lefranc O, Bayon Y, Montanari S, Gravagna P, Thérin M (2011) Reinforcement materials in soft tissue repair: key parameters controlling tolerance and performance – current and future trends in mesh development. New Tech Genit Prolapse Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-136-1_25
- 47.Cajigas I, Burks SS, Gernsback J, Fine L, Moshiree B, Levi AD (2015) Allergy to Prolene sutures in a Dural graft for Chiari decompression. Case Rep Med:583570Google Scholar