Patient-rated physician empathy and patient satisfaction during pain clinic consultations
- 60 Downloads
Little is known about the influence of patient-perceived healthcare provider empathy on patient satisfaction in the setting of a hospital pain clinic consultation. The objective of this research was to examine the relationship between patient-rated physician empathy and patient satisfaction after a single new pain clinic consultation.
After institutional ethics committee approval, a sample of 140 adult patients completed a two-page questionnaire, directly after a pain clinic consultation. This included a brief sociodemographic questionnaire, the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure and an overall satisfaction rating.
The sample, N = 140 patients, was balanced for gender and 80% of participants ranged in age from 30 to 70. Of these patients, 80.7% had been living with chronic pain between 1 and 5 years. The data were deemed to be non-parametric and a Spearman’s ranked order correlation analysis yielded a strong positive correlation between patient-rated physician empathy and patient consultation satisfaction.
Patient-rated physician empathy was strongly correlated with patient satisfaction in a pain clinic consultation. Patient satisfaction plays a significant role in adherence to treatment and contributes to a positive working patient-physician therapeutic relationship. This research supports the growing body of research citing the importance of investing in, promoting and developing educational programs for physicians and medical trainees to enhance empathic communication skills within the clinical setting.
KeywordsCommunication Empathy Pain clinic Patient satisfaction
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Han JL, Pappas TN (2018) A review of empathy, its importance, and its teaching in surgical training. J Surg Educ 75:88–94Google Scholar
- 2.Menendez ME, Chen NC, Mudgal CS, Jupiter JB, Ring D (2015) Physician empathy as driver of hand surgery patient satisfaction. J Hand Surg 40(9):1860–1865Google Scholar
- 3.Hopayian K, Notley C (2014) A systematic review of low back pain and sciatica patients’ expectations and experiences of health care. Spine J 14:1769–1780Google Scholar
- 5.Eagle M, Wolitsky DL (1997) Empathy: a psychoanalytic perspective. In: Bohart AC, Greenberg LS (eds) Empathy reconsidered: new directions in psycho-therapy. APA, Washington, DC, pp 217–244Google Scholar
- 6.Pedersen R (2009) Empirical research on empathy in medicine —a critical review. Patient Educ Couns 76(3):307–322Google Scholar
- 7.Neuwirth ZE (1997) Physician empathy—should we care? Lancet 350:606Google Scholar
- 8.Singh M (2016) Communication as a bridge to build a sound Doctor-Patient/Parent relationship. Indian J Pediatr 83:33Google Scholar
- 9.Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD (2001) Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract 15(1):25–38Google Scholar
- 11.Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS (2011) Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med 86(3):359–364Google Scholar
- 13.Ambady N, Laplante D, Nguyen T et al (2002) Surgeons’ tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history. Surgery 132(1):5–9Google Scholar
- 14.Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM (1997) Physician- patient communication: the relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA 277(7):553–559Google Scholar
- 15.Banja JD (2006) Empathy in the physicians pain practice: benefits, barriers and recommendations. Pain Med 7(3):265–275Google Scholar
- 16.Havens L (1986) Making contact: uses of language in psychotherapy. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 17.Rafferty MN, Ryan P, Normand C et al (2012) The economic cost of chronic non-cancer pain in Ireland: results from the PRIME study, part 2. J Pain 13(2):139–145Google Scholar
- 19.Kupfer JM, Bond EU (2012) Patient satisfaction and patient-centered care: necessary but not equal. JAMA 308(2):139–140Google Scholar
- 20.Szablowski KM (2014) Hospital value-based purchasing (VBP) program: measurement of quality and enforcement of quality improvement. Conn Med 78(1):49–51Google Scholar
- 21.Welty E, Yeager VA, Ouimet C, Menachemi N (2012) Patient satisfaction among Spanish-speaking patients in a public health setting. J Healthc Qual 34(5):31–38Google Scholar
- 22.The World Health Report (2008) Primary health care now more than ever. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 23.Arora S, Ashrafian H, Davis R, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Sevdalis N (2010) Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies. Med Educ 44(8):749–764Google Scholar
- 24.Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR (2009) Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care 47:826–834Google Scholar
- 25.Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM et al (1995) Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 40:903–918Google Scholar
- 26.Stewart M, Brown JB, Boon H, Galajda J, Meredith L, Sangster M (1999) Evidence on patient-doctor communication. Cancer Prev Control 3:25–30Google Scholar
- 27.Jha AK, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Epstein AM (2008) Patients’ perception of hospital care in the United States. N Engl J Med 359(18):1921–1931Google Scholar
- 28.Bicker AP, Fitzpatrick B, Murphy D et al (2017) Assessing the consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure in sexual heath nurses’ consultations. BMC Nurs 16(71)Google Scholar
- 29.Onwuegbuzie AJ, Daniel LG (2002) A framework for reporting and interpreting internal consistency reliability estimates. Meas Eval Couns Dev 35(2):89–100Google Scholar