Quantification of the impact of interventional radiology in the management of acute pancreatitis
Interventional radiology plays a central role in the management of complicated acute pancreatitis, contributing to image-guided drainages, treating haemorrhagic complications and maintaining the patency of the biliary tree. In addition, many of these patients require long-term venous access for antibiotics or parenteral feeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role and level of involvement of the interventional radiology in this sub-group of patients.
This was a single-centre retrospective review of all admissions for acute pancreatitis over a 5-year period. Each case was assessed to determine whether radiological intervention was utilised.
Our review included 401 patients. A total of 18.7% (75/401) of patients required vascular access procedures and 18.4% (74/401) required image-guided drainage. A total of 1.2% (2/401) patients had embolisation procedures performed. The embolisation procedures were performed to treat a pseudoaneurysm that had formed.
Overall, 20.9% (84/401) of patients were referred to the interventional radiology department for a procedure; a majority of these patients were referred for multiple procedures over the course of their admission. The patients in the ‘severe pancreatitis’ category had a total of 154 procedures performed, which was 65.5% of the total procedures. On average, the patients who underwent multiple interventional procedures tended to have a longer admission and more complex disease.
The diagnosis and treatment of complicated acute pancreatitis is heavily dependent on the interventional radiology department. A substantial proportion of patients with pancreatitis required radiological intervention as part of their management, the proportion of which increased significantly in complex disease.
KeywordsAcute pancreatitis Embolisation Image-guided drainage Interventional radiology Pseudoaneurysm Pseudocyst
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 4.van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH, van Goor H, Schaapherder AF, van Eijck C, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Timmer R, Laméris JS, Kruyt PM, Manusama ER, van der Harst E, van der Schelling G, Karsten T, Hesselink EJ, van Laarhoven C, Rosman C, Bosscha K, de Wit RJ, Houdijk AP, van Leeuwen M, Buskens E, Gooszen HG, Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group (2010) A step-up approach or open Necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 362(16):1491–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Rasch S, Phillip V, Reichel S, Rau B, Zapf C, Rosendahl J, Halm U, Zachäus M, Müller M, Kleger A, Neesse A, Hampe J, Ellrichmann M, Rückert F, Strauß P, Arlt A, Ellenrieder V, Gress TM, Hartwig W, Klar E, Mössner J, Post S, Schmid RM, Seufferlein T, Siech M, Werner J, Will U, Algül H (2016) Open surgical versus minimal invasive Necrosectomy of the pancreas-a retrospective multicenter analysis of the German pancreatitis study group. PLoS One 11(9):e0163651CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 10.Weitz G, Woitalla J, Wellhöner P, Schmidt K, Büning J, Fellermann K (2015) Does etiology of acute pancreatitis matter? A review of 391 consecutive episodes. JOP 16(2):171–175Google Scholar
- 15.Bausch D, Wellner U, Kahl S, Kuesters S, Richter-Schrag H-J, Utzolino S, Hopt UT, Keck T, Fischer A (2012) Minimally invasive operations for acute necrotizing pancreatitis: comparison of minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy with endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy. Surgery 152(3 Suppl 1):S128–S134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Elke G, van Zanten ARH, Lemieux M, McCall M, Jeejeebhoy KN, Kott M, Jiang X, Day AG, Heyland DK (2016) Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 20(1):117CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.Rinninella E, Annetta MG, Serricchio ML, Dal Lago AA, Miggiano GAD, Mele MC (2017) Nutritional support in acute pancreatitis: from physiopathology to practice. An evidence-based approach. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 21(2):421–432Google Scholar
- 21.Bakker OJ, van Brunschot S, Farre A, Johnson CD, Kalfarentzos F, Louie BE, Oláh A, O'Keefe SJ, Petrov MS, Powell JJ, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Rovers MM, Gooszen HG (2014) Timing of enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: meta-analysis of individuals using a single-arm of randomised trials. Pancreatology 14(5):340–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar