Implementation of day of surgery admission for rectal cancer surgery in Ireland following a national centralisation programme
Centralisation of rectal cancer surgery has altered the delivery of colorectal cancer care in Ireland. This has resulted in an increased demand for elective surgical beds in designated centres.
This study aimed to assess if day of surgery admission (DOSA), in conjunction with implementation of a coordinated enhanced recovery pathway can reduce length of stay following elective rectal cancer resection.
This is a retrospective review from a single institution. Our prospectively maintained Dendrite® Database was interrogated. Three time points were analysed across a 7-year period (2011, 2012, 2016). The first predates the introduction of a dedicated DOSA programme, the next was directly thereafter, and the final was 5-years post-implementation. These dates coincide with the centralisation of rectal cancer surgery to this centre. Outcomes included unadjusted length of stay and rates of DOSA pre-and post-implementation of the programme.
The introduction of a DOSA pathway resulted in a fivefold increase in day of surgery admissions and a related 3-day reduction in average length of stay within a single year of implementation. This further improved in 2016, showing an almost 83% increase (15.90–98.50%) in day of surgery admission and a reduction in average length of stay from 16.4 to 12.4 days when compared to 2011.
Despite an increase in caseload of 54%, an estimated 272 bed days were saved. This demonstrated that DOSA is sustainable and highly effective in tackling the increased inpatient bed demands associated with the growing requirement for elective surgery.
KeywordsCentralisation Day of surgery admission Ireland Length of stay Rectal cancer
Study concept and design: D.A. McNamara
Study materials: I. Stephens
Data collection: I. Stephens and C. Murphy
Data analysis: I. Stephens and I.S Reynolds
Manuscript preparation: All authors
Manuscript review: All authors
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Department of Health and Children (2006) A strategy for cancer control in Ireland. National Cancer ForumGoogle Scholar
- 5.National Cancer Control Programme (2014) Report on the implementation of “a strategy for cancer control in Ireland 2006”. Health Service ExecutiveGoogle Scholar
- 8.Spanjersberg W, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven C (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Art. No.: CD007635Google Scholar
- 11.Department of Health (2017) National cancer strategy 2017-2026. National cancer control programmeGoogle Scholar