Advertisement

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

, Volume 188, Issue 1, pp 211–218 | Cite as

How to establish a successful bowel management programme in children: a tertiary paediatric centre experience

  • Ann M. Costigan
  • Stephanie Orr
  • Abdulrahman E. Alshafei
  • Brice A. AntaoEmail author
Original Article
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Bowel management is a term used to describe a medical approach to the management of faecal incontinence.

Aims

To present the outcomes of an individualised bowel management programme developed by a tertiary paediatric centre and evaluate contributory factors for successful bowel management in children.

Methods

A retrospective review of children attending a bowel management clinic in a tertiary centre in Dublin, Ireland, over 5 years (2010–2015). The main outcome measure was the ability to achieve a regular bowel pattern and remain socially clean. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine the factors contributing to successful bowel management.

Results

One hundred ninety-two children attended the clinic over 5 years. The median age at commencement of washouts was 7 years. Underlying diagnosis was spina bifida in 50%, imperforate anus in 17.7%, Hirschsprung’s disease in 14.6%, idiopathic constipation in 7.8%, and other conditions in 9.9% of patients. Children with spina bifida and Hirschsprung’s disease preferred Peristeen washouts, while those with imperforate anus and idiopathic constipation preferred Willis washouts (p < 0.001). Our programme was successful in 93.7% of cases. Regression analysis showed that the underlying condition (p < 0.001), washout medication (p = 0.016), and individuals administering washouts (p < 0.001) contributed to a successful bowel management programme.

Conclusion

Treatment protocols should be individualised based on the underlying condition and outcomes. Decision-making must be cognisant of the physical, social, psychological, and developmental needs of the child and family. A partnership approach is advocated, which includes child and parent/carer preferences allowing them to make an informed decision.

Keywords

Bowel management Bowel washout Children Constipation Faecal incontinence 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethics statement

For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Bischoff A, Levitt M, Bauer C et al (2009) Treatment of fecal incontinence with a comprehensive bowel management program. J Pediatr Surg 44:1278–1284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norton C, Chelvanayagam S (2000) A nursing assessment tool for adults with fecal incontinence. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 27:279–291.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00152192-200,009,000-00007 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohr C (2009) Using rectal irrigation for fecal incontinence in children. Nurs Times 105:42–44Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Norton C, Whitehead W (2009) Conservative and pharmacological management of faecal incontinence in adults. In: Abram P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (ed) Incontinence: 4th International Consultation on Incontinence. Bristol, United Kingdom, pp. 1521–1564Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bischoff A, Levitt M, Peña A (2009) Bowel management for the treatment of pediatric fecal incontinence. Pediatr Surg Int 25:1027–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2502-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    (2017) EUROCAT. http://www.eurocat-network.eu. Accessed 12 Sep 2017
  7. 7.
    (2017) Spina Bifida. http://www.sbhi.ie/about_spina_bifida. Accessed 12 Sep 2017
  8. 8.
    Lewis S, Heaton K (1997) Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 32:920–924.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00365529709011203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rockwood TH (2004) Incontinence severity and QOL scales for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126:S106–S113.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mosiello G, Marshall D, Rolle U et al (2017) Consensus review of best practice of transanal irrigation in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 64:343–352.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bray L, Sanders C (2013) An evidence-based review of the use of transanal irrigation in children and young people with neurogenic bowel. Spinal Cord 51:88–93.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willis R (1989) Faecal incontinence—Willis Home Bowel Washout Programme. Z Kinderchir 44:46–47.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1,043,294 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koch S, Uludağ Ö, El Naggar K et al (2007) Colonic irrigation for defecation disorders after dynamic graciloplasty. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:195–200.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0375-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Everman D, Nitu M, Jacobs B (2003) Respiratory failure requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after sodium phosphate enema intoxication. Eur J Pediatr 162:517–519.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-002-0987-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sédaba B, Azanza J, Campanero M et al (2006) Effects of a 250-mL enema containing sodium phosphate on electrolyte concentrations in healthy volunteers: an open-label, randomized, controlled, two-period, crossover clinical trial. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 67:334–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2006.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann M. Costigan
    • 1
  • Stephanie Orr
    • 1
  • Abdulrahman E. Alshafei
    • 1
  • Brice A. Antao
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Paediatric SurgeryOur Lady’s Children’s HospitalDublin 12Ireland
  2. 2.Beacon Hospital for KidsDublin 18Ireland

Personalised recommendations