Advertisement

JOM

pp 1–8 | Cite as

Recycling of Discarded Tubular Lights for Recovery of Rare Earth Values

  • Himanshu Tanvar
  • Neha Shukla
  • Nikhil DhawanEmail author
Cleaner Manufacturing of Critical Metals
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Increasing demand for rare earth elements (REEs) and instabilities in their supply chain requires an alternative source for REEs. Discarded tubular lights have been evaluated in this study as a potential source of REEs. Phosphor dust separated after crushing, and sieving of tubular lights, comprises approximately 34% rare earths (Y, Eu, Ce, Tb) in Y1.90Eu0.10O3 and Al11Ce0.67MgO19Tb0.33 phases. The present study is focused on a two-step recovery of REEs, the recovery of Y and Eu (> 95%) via a leaching route followed by the recovery of Ce (40%) and Tb (> 95%) from leach residue using microwave exposure followed by leaching. The Y and Eu leaching process is optimized using a statistical design to evaluate different leaching parameters, reaction kinetics, while the activation energy was also studied. The leach residue was microwave-treated with NaOH for the dissociation of Ce- and Tb-bearing phases. The material balance reveals that it is possible to recover 52 g of the mixed oxides of Y and Eu and 7 g of the mixed oxides of Tb, Ce, Eu, and Y with purities of over 99% from 100 units of tubular lights.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding received from the Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee (Faculty Initiation Grant; FIG-100714).

References

  1. 1.
    F. Habashi, Can. Metall. Q. 52, 224 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I.C. Nlebedim and A.H. King, JOM 70, 115 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Tunsu, C. Ekberg, and T. Retegan, Hydrometallurgy 145, 91 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Tanvar and N. Dhawan, Miner. Eng. 135, 95 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Tunsu, M. Petranikova, C. Ekberg, and T. Retegan, Sep. Purif. Technol. 161, 172 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.M. Eduafo and B. Mishra, J. Sustain. Metall. 4, 437 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Miskufova, A. Kochmanova, T. Havlik, H. Horvathova, and P. Kuruc, Hydrometallurgy 176, 216 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Liu, S.-G. Zhang, and D.-A. Pan, Y-F, B Liu, JJ Tian, AA Volinsky. Rare Met. 34, 189 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. He, W. Ji, Y. Yin, and W. Sun, J. Rare Earths 36, 108 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Liu, S. Zhanga, D. Pana, J. Tiana, M. Yanga, M. Wua, and A.A. Volinsky, J. Hazard. Mater. 272, 96 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. Liang, Y. Liu, R. Lin, D. Guoa, and C. Liao, Hydrometallurgy 163, 99 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Tanvar, S. Kumar, and N. Dhawan, JOM 71, 2345 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.K. Roy, A primer on the Taguchi method (New York: Reinhold, 1995).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C.K. Gupta and N. Krishnamurthy, Extractive Metallurgy of Rare Earths (Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Z. Dan, C. Ji, and L. Deqian, J. Rare Earths 32, 681 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Li, J. Chen, D. Zou, T. Liu, and D. Li, J. Rare Earths 37, 198 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations