pp 1–6 | Cite as

Synthesis of Mo2C from MoO3 and C2H5OH

  • Melek Cumbul AltayEmail author
  • Serafettin Eroglu
Metallurgical Kinetics


The aim of the present study is to investigate the feasibility of using liquid ethanol as a precursor for carburization of MoO3. Ethanol vapor was transported by Ar flow to a MoO3 powder bed during heating to 1000 K and 1100 K and during holding at these temperatures for different times. Single-phase Mo2C was obtained at 1000 K, 1050 K, and 1100 K within isothermal reaction time of 60 min, 30 min, and 15 min, respectively, after nonisothermal heating. Mo loss was insignificant due to formation of nonvolatile MoO2. The product prepared at 1000 K exhibited porous rounded Mo2C particles, while lenticular particles were observed at 1050 K and 1100 K. The carburization process was controlled by the intrinsic chemical reaction kinetics in the temperature range studied. The thermodynamic results indicated that MoO3 was reduced and carburized by ethanol-derived gaseous species (mainly H2, CH4, and CO). The present study demonstrates that it is feasible to use ethanol for carburization of MoO3.



  1. 1.
    E. Martinez, U. Wiklund, J. Esteve, and F. Montalà, Wear 253, 1182 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.-H. Li, X.-Z. Fu, J.-L. Luo, K.T. Chuang, and A.R. Sanger, Electrochem. Commun. 15, 81 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Ma, G. Guan, X. Hao, J. Cao, and A. Abudula, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 75, 1101 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Xiao, J.Y. Hwang, and Y.K. Sun, J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 10379 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Patel and J. Subrahmanyam, Mater. Res. Bull. 43, 2036 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Schwarzkopf and R. Kieffer, Refractory Hard Metals: Borides, Carbides, Nitrides, and Silicides (New York: Macmillan, 1953).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Cetinkaya and S. Eroglu, JOM 69, 1997 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Rao Suryaprakash, T.R. Mankhand, and P.M. Prasad, Mater. Trans. JIM. 37, 239 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Cetinkaya and S. Eroglu, J Alloys Compd. 489, 36 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Li, W.B. Kim, and J.S. Lee, Chem. Mater. 10, 1853 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Xiao, A.P.E. York, K.S. Coleman, J.B. Claridge, J. Sloan, J. Charnock, and M.L.H. Green, J. Mater. Chem. 11, 3094 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Hanif, T. Xiao, A.P.E. York, J. Sloan, and M.L.H. Green, Chem. Mater. 14, 1009 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Xiao, A.P.E. York, V.C. Williams, H. Al-Megren, A. Hanif, X. Zhou, and M.L.H. Green, Chem. Mater. 12, 3896 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Korkmaz, S. Cetinkaya, and S. Eroglu, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 47, 2378 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Eriksson, Chem. Scr. 8, 100 (1975).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    T.M. Besmann, Report no. ORNL/TM-5775 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, 1977).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    I. Barin 2nd, eds., Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances (Weinheim: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, 1993).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.W. Chase, C.A. Davies, J.R. Downey, D.J. Frurip, R.A. McDonald, and A.N. Syverud, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1, 1 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringIstanbul University - CerrahpasaAvcilar, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations