pp 1–6 | Cite as

Efficient Bath-Smelting Reduction of Antimony Oxide in FeO-SiO2-CaO-Na2O Quaternary Slag with Low Melting Point

  • Longgang Ye
  • Chaobo Tang
  • Heng Liu
  • Yongming ChenEmail author
Sustainable Pyrometallurgical Processing


An FeO-SiO2-CaO-Na2O quaternary slag with low melting point was developed for the bath-smelting reduction of Sb2O3. First, the optimum composition of the designed slag was determined through practical experiments to be 36.2% FeO, 31.9% SiO2, 12.0% CaO, and 20.0% Na2O, such that FeO/SiO2 was 1.14. The effects of the main variables influencing the yield and content of antimony in the smelting slag were investigated in detail for the content-optimized slag, and the following optimum smelting conditions were determined: smelting duration of 50 min, rate of coke, i.e., coke dosage of 12.5 wt.%, and smelting temperature of 1000°C. These conditions enabled high recovery of antimony, > 92.0%, and low antimony content in the slag of around 0.97%; the values of both these parameters are superior to those achieved by existing processes.



This project was supported financially by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51604105) for which the authors are grateful. We also acknowledge the several helpful comments and suggestions from anonymous reviewers.


  1. 1.
    C.G. Anderson, Chem. Erde 72, 3 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Habashi, Handbook of Extractive Metallurgy (Berlin: Wiley, 1997), p. 823.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.A. Awe, J. Sundkvist, N. Bolin, and A. Sandstrom, Miner. Eng. 49, 45 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.G. Yang and Y.T. Wu, Hydrometallurgy 143, 68 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.G. Ye, C.B. Tang, Y.M. Chen, S.H. Yang, J.G. Yang, and W.H. Zhang, J. Clean. Prod. 93, 134 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.F. Liu, T.Z. Yang, and D.C. Zhang, JOM 66, 1694 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Liu, H.L. Luo, W.Q. Qing, Y.X. Zheng, and K. Yang, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 45, 1281 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T.Z. Zhao, The Metallurgy of Antimony (Changsha: Central South University of Technology Press, 1988), p. 455.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.Q. Qin, H.L. Luo, W. Liu, Y.X. Zheng, K. Yang, and J.W. Han, J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 868 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Gutierrez, R.S. Antonia, G. Plascencia, F. Chavez, and R. Vargas, ISIJ Int. 40, 664 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. Brain, O. Knacke, and O. Kubaschewski, Thermochemical Properties of Inorganic Substances (New York: Springer, 1972), p. 138.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W.C. Yang, S.Q. Tian, J.X. Wu, L.Y. Chai, and Q. Liao, JOM 69, 1077 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Longgang Ye
    • 1
  • Chaobo Tang
    • 2
  • Heng Liu
    • 2
  • Yongming Chen
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Metallurgy and Material EngineeringHunan University of TechnologyZhuzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Metallurgy and EnvironmentCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations