, Volume 71, Issue 1, pp 34–39 | Cite as

Numerical Simulations of Irregular CeO2 Particle Size Distributions

  • Chao Lv
  • Ting-An ZhangEmail author
  • Zhi-He Dou
  • Qiu-Yue Zhao
CFD Modeling and Simulation in Materials Processing


During CeO2 preparation via jet-flow pyrolysis, the standard spherical particles typically assumed in numerical simulations do not match the actual particle morphologies. In the present work, an extension factor α, fullness factor k, and shrinkage ratio β were introduced to characterize the distributions of several specific types of irregular spherical CeO2 particles inside a jet-flow pyrolysis reactor. All three parameters were found to affect the CeO2 yield, with the maximum yield of 98.73% obtained at α = – 0.25, k = 1 and β = 1 and a lower yield of 92.05% at α = 0.25, k = 1, and β = 1.5.



We thank Michael D. Judge, MSc, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Editing China (, for editing the English text of a draft of this article. This research was supported by the Specialized Fund for the Basic Research Operating expenses Program of Central College (N172303012), the Scientific Research Fund project of Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao (XNY201808), and the National Science and Technology Support Program (No. 2012BAE01B02).


  1. 1.
    X. Yan, J.C. Zhou, and X.Y. Deng, China Chem. 4, 44 (2008).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Xiang (Master’s dissertation, Shen Yang: The Northeastern University, 2010).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Lv, Q.Y. Zhao, Z.M. Zhang, and T. Nonferr, Met. Soc. 25, 997 (2015).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Lv, Z.M. Zhang, and Q.Y. Zhao, Rare Met. 34, 600 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Q.Y. Zhao, C. Lv, and Z.M. Zhang, JOM 66, 1647 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Wang, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 22, 185 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y.C. Zhou, B.H. Xu, and A.B. Yu, Powder Technol. 125, 45 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Li, Z.H. Jiang, J. Guo, and J.S. Guo, China Powder Sci. Technol. 23, 39 (2017).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.Q. Jiang, C.A. Tan, R. Chen, and Y.Q. Tan, J. Sedim. Res. 42, 63 (2017).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Chen, J.H. Ma, and T. Liu, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 132, 335 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Ma, Y.S. Sun, and B.W. Li, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 114, 469 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Ma, Y.S. Sun, and B.W. Li, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 118, 475 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. Motasemi and A.G. Gerber, Fuel 211, 649 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    X.P. Wang, Z.L. Ye, Y.Q. Meng, and H.D. Li, J. Comp. Added Des. Comp. Graph. 14, 66 (2002).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    X. Yang (Ph.D. dissertation, Wuhan: The University of Science and Technology of China, 2016).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Ecological Metallurgy of Multi-metal Intergrown Ores of Ministry of Education, Special Metallurgy and Process Engineering InstituteNortheastern UniversityShenyangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Northeastern University at QinhuangdaoQinhuangdaoPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations