Advertisement

JOM

, Volume 71, Issue 1, pp 336–341 | Cite as

Effects of Porosity and Electrical Resistance of Metallurgical Coke and Semicoke on Silicon Recovery in an Electric Arc Furnace

  • Hossein Hasannezhad
  • Amirhossein Meysami
Electric Arc Smelting
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of the electrical resistance and porosity of two types of coke used in ferrosilicon electric arc furnaces were investigated to determine the silicon recovery from quartz rock (\( {\text{SiO}}_{2} \)). To investigate the effect of the electrical resistance and porosity on the quartz recovery rate, semicoke and metallurgical coke were separately tested in ferrosilicon arc furnaces. The product was quantitatively and qualitatively studied. The results showed that the higher electrical resistance and porosity of semicoke, in comparison with metallurgical coke, increased the efficiency of silicon recovery and also reduced the electrical energy consumption. The furnace efficiency when using semicoke and metallurgical coke was 90.8% and 80.5%, respectively.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Iran Ferroalloys Industries Co. and Mr. Ali Nasiri for his assistance.

Supplementary material

11837_2018_3172_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1092 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    M. Gasik, Handbook of Ferro Alloys Theory and Technology, ed. M. Tangstad (Cambridge, MA: Elsevier, 2013). pp. 179.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Kadkhodabeigi, Modeling of Tapping Processes in Submerged Arc Furnaces, Thesis for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Trondheim, May 2011.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.M. Moosavi Nezhad and A. Zabett, CALPHAD 52, 143 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Suetens, B. Klaasen, K.V. Ackerw, and B. Blanpain, J. Clean. Prod. 65, 152 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Holappa, J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 10, 703 (2010).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.T. Ingason and G.R. Jonsson, On the control of silicon ratio in ferrosilicon production. IFAC Automation in Steel Industry, Kyongju, Korea, 1998, pp. 73–78.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.G. Kaliakparov, A.V. Suslov, and V.M. Strakhov, Coke Chem. 57, 245 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V.M. Strakhov, V.S. Medyanik, L.I. Malinovskaya, A.A. Tsernikel, and I.A. Veselovsky, Coke Chem. 59, 245 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Monsen and B. Tangstad, Use of Charcoal in Silicomanganese Production, Tenth International Ferroalloys Congress, Cape Town, South Africa, 1–4 February 2004, pp. 392–404.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. A. Eidem and M. Tangstad, Influence of Coke Particle Size on The Electrical Resistivity of Coke Beds, The Twelfth International Ferroalloys Congress, Helsinki, Finland, 6–9 June 2010, pp. 349–358.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V.V. Buryak and G.N. Vasilchenko, Refract. Ind. Ceram. 54, 215 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O. Raaness and R. Gray, Coal in the production of silicon rich alloy, INFACON7, Trondheim, Norway, 1995, pp. 201–220.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. M. Sloman, C. P. Please, R. A. Vangorder, A. M. Valderhaug, R. G. Birkeland, and H. Wegge, Metall. Mater. Trans. B (2017)  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-017-1052-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Tranell, M. Andersson, E. Ringdalen, O. Ostrovski, and J. J. Steinmo, Reaction zone in a FeSi75 furnace-results from an industrial excavation, 12th International Ferroalloys Congress, Helsinki, Finland, 2010, p. 709–716.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zh. Nurmukhanbetov, O. Privalov, and L. Prokopyev, Reducibility and Electric Resistance of Carbonaceus Materials within Ferroalloys Smelting Processes, The 13th International Ferroalloys Congress, Almaty, Kazakhstan, June 9–13, 2013, pp. 479–488.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Krogerus, T. Lintumaa, and P. Jokinen, Laboratory Investigations of the Electrical Resistivity of Coke and Smelting Charge for Optimizing Operation in Lage Ferrochorome Furnaces, Southern African Pyrometallurgical, Johannesburg, South Africa, March 5–8 2006, pp. 309–328.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Nishimiya, T. Hata, H. Kikuchi, and Y. Imamura, J. Wood Sci. 50, 177 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Metallurgy and Materials EngineeringGolpayegan University of TechnologyGolpayeganIran

Personalised recommendations