, Volume 70, Issue 9, pp 1863–1869 | Cite as

Effects of Reusing Ti-6Al-4V Powder in a Selective Laser Melting Additive System Operated in an Industrial Setting

  • Oscar A. QuintanaEmail author
  • Jorge Alvarez
  • Roderick Mcmillan
  • Weidong Tong
  • Charles Tomonto
Additive Manufacturing: Striving Toward Quality Control


Cost control and quality of additive manufactured (AM) components are critical characteristics for the success of this technology for industrial applications. Understanding how the virgin powder changes in terms of chemistry and physical properties with reuse cycles provides important information that can be translated into cost-effective practices for managing recycled powder. In this study, we focused on an industrial AM setting, where different numbers of components were printed on each build. A single lot of powder was reused for manufacturing a total of 31 builds using a selective laser melting additive system. The effects of reuse cycles on the characteristics of Ti-6Al-4V extra low interstitial powder were evaluated, during and prior to the printing process, by means of particle size distribution, tap density, flowability, powder morphology, and chemical composition. Additionally, chemical analysis and tensile testing of solid bars in the hot isostatically pressed (HIP) condition were evaluated in relation to powder reuse times. After reusing the powder for 31 times, it was found that the oxygen content increased to a maximum of 0.13 wt.%, whereas nitrogen, aluminum, and vanadium remained stable. The powder exhibited surface coarsening, and although some elongated/irregular particles were observed, mostly spherical powder particles with fewer satellites were present. Flowability improved, and tap density showed a slight decline with reuse times. No detrimental effect was found on the tensile properties of solid material postprocessed using HIP.



The authors would like to thank Andrew Rosenberger for the technical discussions throughout this investigation and Robert Rybolt for his technical assistance. We also thank Fionnan Mc Namara, Greg Duggan, and Eoin Hinchy for their valuable comments and suggestions on the planning of this study. Finally, we thank Todd Render for all the support provided throughout this study. All with DePuy Synthes.


  1. 1.
    D. Herzog, V. Seyda, E. Wycisk, and C. Emmelmann, Acta Mater. 117, 371 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.V. Hooreweder, Y. Apers, K. Lietaert, and J.-P. Kruth, Acta Biomater. 47, 193 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.B. Nover, S.L. Lee, M.S. Georgescu, D.R. Howard, R.A. Saunders, W.T. Yu, R.W. Klein, A.P. Napolitano, G.A. Ateshian, and C.T. Hung, Acta Biomater. 27, 286 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Wang, Y. Shen, Z. Wang, J. Yang, N. Liu, and W. Huang, Mater. Lett. 64, 674 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.C. Ardila, F. Garciandia, J.B. González-Díaz, P. Álvarez, A. Echeverria, M.M. Petite, R. Deffley, and J. Ochoa, Phys. Procedia 56, 99 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Seyda, N. Kaufmann, and C. Emmelmann, Phys. Procedia 39, 425 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.P. Tang, M. Qian, N. Liu, X.Z. Zhang, G.Y. Yang, and J. Wang, JOM 67, 555 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S.M. Gaytan, L.E. Murr, F. Medina, E. Martinez, M.I. Lopez, and R.B. Wicker, Mater. Technol. 24, 180 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Thejane, S. Chikosha, and W.B. du Preez, S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. 18, 161 (2017).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.T. Andani, R. Dehghani, M.R. Karamooz-Ravari, R. Mirzaeifar, and J. Ni, Addit. Manuf. 20, 33 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASTM E1409-13, Standard Test Method for Determination of Oxygen and Nitrogen in Titanium and Titanium Alloys by Inert Gas Fusion (West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2013).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM E2371-13, Standard Test Method for Analysis of Titanium and Titanium Alloys by Direct Current Plasma and Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based Test Methodology) (West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2013).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ASTM B822-17, Standard Test Method for Particle Size Distribution of Metal Powders and Related Compounds by Light Scattering (West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2017).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ASTM B213-17, Standard Test Methods for Flow Rate of Metal Powders Using the Hall Flowmeter Funnel (West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2017).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASTM B527–15, Standard Test Method for Tap Density of Metal Powders and Compounds (West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2015).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASTM F3001–14, Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Titanium-6 Aluminum-4Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) with Powder Bed Fusion (West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2014).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Barclift, S. Joshi, T. Simpson, and C. Dickman, in Solid Freedom Fabrication Symposium, 2007 (2016).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.A. Slotwinski and E.J. Garboczi, JOM 67, 538 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Sun, M. Aindow, and R.J. Hebert, Addit. Manuf. 21, 544 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    O.A. Quintana and W. Tong, JOM 69, 2693 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Yan, M.S. Dargusch, T. Ebel, and M. Qian, Acta Mater. 68, 196 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.M. Oh, B.G. Lee, S.W. Cho, S.W. Lee, G.S. Choi, and J.W. Lim, Met. Mater. Int. 17, 733 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oscar A. Quintana
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jorge Alvarez
    • 2
  • Roderick Mcmillan
    • 3
  • Weidong Tong
    • 1
  • Charles Tomonto
    • 2
  1. 1.Front End Research and DevelopmentDePuy Synthes Joint ReconstructionWarsawUSA
  2. 2.Johnson & Johnson’s 3D Printing Center of ExcellenceMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Johnson & Johnson’s 3D Printing Center of ExcellenceWest ChesterUSA

Personalised recommendations