Advertisement

A Brief Review and a New Graph-Based Image Analysis for Concrete Crack Quantification

  • Mahsa Payab
  • Reza Abbasina
  • Mostafa KhanzadiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 238 Downloads

Abstract

This paper surveys development using image-based methods for crack analysis in the last two-decade (2002–2016).This study aimed to extract and quantify the individual cracks in concrete surfaces, using a new automated image-based system. In general, an individual crack can appear in concrete structures as one of the three common configurations including longitudinal, transverse, and diagonal cracks. These kinds of cracks propagate inherently as linear, and may be involved in branching and spalling at some point of the original path. The main contribution of this work is twofold. First, the main mother crack is extracted using the graph theory and simulates the crack group proportionally. Second, the exact width of cracks can be measured automatically. The procedure has been automated in this study to calculate the individual crack characteristics including the length, average width, and orientation. Furthermore, the analytical results are presented as the distribution of accurate width variations along the length of the skeleton, maximum crack width and its location on the crack and graph. The results indicated that the proposed image-based crack quantification method can accurately measure changing the crack characteristics like width along it. It is demonstrated that the proposed method is applicable and shows good performance in conventional assessment of distressed concrete surfaces.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Koch C et al (2015) A review on computer vision based defect detection and condition assessment of concrete and asphalt civil infrastructure. Adv Eng Inform 29(2):196–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zakeri H, Nejad FM, Fahimifar A (2017) Image based techniques for crack detection, classification and quantification in asphalt pavement: a review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 24:935–977CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jahanshahi MR et al (2009) A survey and evaluation of promising approaches for automatic image-based defect detection of bridge structures. Struct Infrastruct Eng 5(6):455–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chambon S, Moliard J (2011) Automatic road pavement assessment with image processing: review and comparison. Int J Geophys 2011:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amhaz R et al (2014) A new minimal path selection algorithm for automatic crack detection on pavement images. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on image processing, ICIP 2014. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IncGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zou Q et al (2012) CrackTree: automatic crack detection from pavement images. Pattern Recogn Lett 33(3):227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grandsaert PJ (2015) Integrating pavement crack detection and analysis using autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. 2015, DTIC DocumentGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oliveira H, Correia PL (2013) Automatic road crack detection and characterization. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 14(1):155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang J, Gu Y (2013) Automatic crack detection and segmentation using a hybrid algorithm for road distress analysis. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, SMC 2013, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsai Y, Kaul V, Yezzi A (2013) Automating the crack map detection process for machine operated crack sealer. Autom Construct 31:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jahanshahi MR, Masri SF (2013) A new methodology for non-contact accurate crack width measurement through photogrammetry for automated structural safety evaluation. Smart Mater Struct 22(3):035079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salman M et al (2013) Pavement crack detection using the Gabor filter. In: 2013 16th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems: intelligent transportation systems for all modes, ITSC 2013, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shen Y et al (2014) A compressed sensing pavement distress image filtering algorithm based on NSCT domain. Guangdianzi Jiguang/J Optoelectron Laser 25(8):1620–1626Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsai YC, Kaul V, Lettsome CA (2012) Enhanced adaptive filter-bank-based automated pavement crack detection and segmentation system. J Electron Imaging 21(4):043008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lettsome CA, Tsai Y (2012) An automated filter bank-based pavement crack detection system incorporating standard compression coders. Int J Pavement Res Technol 5(3):176–186Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang Y, Xu B (2006) Automatic inspection of pavement cracking distress. J Electron Imaging 15(1):013017–013017-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nishikawa T et al (2012) Concrete crack detection by multiple sequential image filtering. Comput Aid Civ Infrastruct Eng 27(1):29–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Timm DH, McQueen JM (2004) A study of manual vs. automated pavement condition surveys. Auburn University, AlabamaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsai Y-C, Kaul V, Mersereau RM (2009) Critical assessment of pavement distress segmentation methods. J Transp Eng 136(1):11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zalama E et al (2014) Road crack detection using visual features extracted by gabor filters. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 29(5):342–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang J et al (2009) Pavement crack automatic recognition based on wiener filtering. In: Critical issues in transportation system planning, development, and management proceedings of the ninth international conference of Chinese transportation professionals 2009Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhou J, Huang P, Chiang F-P (2005) Wavelet-based pavement distress classification. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1940(1):89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhou J, Huang PS (2006) Chiang F-P (2006) Wavelet-based pavement distress detection and evaluation. Opt Eng 45(2):027007–027007-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jahanshahi MR, Masri SF (2013) A new methodology for non-contact accurate crack width measurement through photogrammetry for automated structural safety evaluation. Smart Mater Struct 22(3):035019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dare P et al (2002) An operational application of automatic feature extraction: the measurement of cracks in concrete structures. Photogram Rec 17(99):453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yamaguchi T, Hashimoto S (2010) Fast crack detection method for large-size concrete surface images using percolation-based image processing. Mach Vis Appl 21(5):797–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen L-C et al (2006) Measuring system for cracks in concrete using multitemporal images. J Surv Eng 132(2):77–82MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shan B, Zheng S, Ou J (2016) A stereovision-based crack width detection approach for concrete surface assessment. KSCE J Civ Eng 20(2):803–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jahanshahi MR et al (2013) An innovative methodology for detection and quantification of cracks through incorporation of depth perception. Mach Vis Appl 24(2):227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee BY et al (2013) Automated image processing technique for detecting and analysing concrete surface cracks. Struct Infrastruct Eng 9(6):567–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Adhikari R, Moselhi O, Bagchi A (2014) Image-based retrieval of concrete crack properties for bridge inspection. Autom Construct 39:180–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu Y et al (2014) Automated assessment of cracks on concrete surfaces using adaptive digital image processing. Smart Struct Syst 14(4):719–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu Y-F et al (2014) Concrete crack assessment using digital image processing and 3D scene reconstruction. J Comput Civ Eng 30(1):04014124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sollazzo G et al (2016) Hybrid procedure for automated detection of cracking with 3D pavement data. J Comput Civ Eng 30:04016032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jahanshahi MR, Chen FC, Joffe C, Masri SF (2016) Vision-based quantitative assessment of microcracks on reactor internal components of nuclear power plants. Struct Infrastruct Eng 13(8):1013–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations