Advertisement

Pressure–Impulse (P–I) Diagrams for Reinforced Concrete (RC) Structures: A Review

  • M. AbediniEmail author
  • Azrul A. MutalibEmail author
  • Sudharshan N. Raman
  • R. Alipour
  • E. Akhlaghi
Original Paper

Abstract

In recent years, many studies have been conducted by governmental and nongovernmental organizations across the world attempt to better understand the effect of blast loads on structures in order to better design against specific threats. Pressure–Impulse (P–I) diagram is an easiest method for describing a structure’s response to blast load. Therefore, this paper presents a comprehensive overview of P–I diagrams in RC structures under blast loads. The effects of different parameters on P–I diagram is performed. Three major methods to develop P–I diagram for various damage criterions are discussed in this research. Analytical methods are easy and simple to use but have limitations on the kinds of failure modes and unsuitable for complex geometries and irregular shape of pulse loads that they can capture. Experimental method is a good way to study the structure response to blast loads; however, it is require special and expensive instrumentation and also not possible in many cases due to the safety and environmental consideration. Despite numerical methods are capable of incorporating complex features of the material behaviour, geometry and boundary conditions. Hence, numerical method is suggested for developing P–I diagrams for new structural elements.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for financial support under Grant FRGS-1-2015-TK01-UKM-02-4 and AP-2015-011.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    UFC-3-340-02 (2008) Design of structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. US Army Corps of Engineers, Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Air Force Civil Engineer Support Agency, Dept of the Army and Defense Special Weapons Agency, Washington, DC Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASCE (2011) Blast protection of buildings. In: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). ASCE-59-11, Reston, VA, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    TM5-1300 (1990) Structures to resist the effects of the accidental explosions. In: Technical manual. US Department of Army, Picatinny Arsenal, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    FEMA428 (2004) Explosive blast. In: Risk management series. US department of Homeland Security, Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morrill K, Malvar L, Crawford J Ferritto J (2004) Blast resistant design and retrofit of reinforced concrete columns and walls. In: Proceedings of the 2004 structures congress–building on the past: securing the future. Nashville, TN, USA, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu J, Wu C, Xiang H, Su Y, Li Z-X, Fang Q et al (2016) Behaviour of ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete columns subjected to blast loading. Eng Struct 118:97–107Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al-Thairy H (2016) A modified single degree of freedom method for the analysis of building steel columns subjected to explosion induced blast load. Int J Impact Eng 94:120–133Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang F, Wu C, Zhao X-L, Heidarpour A, Li Z (2016) Experimental and numerical study of blast resistance of square CFDST columns with steel-fibre reinforced concrete. Eng Struct 149:50–63Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campidelli M, Tait M, El-Dakhakhni W, Mekky W (2016) Numerical strategies for damage assessment of reinforced concrete block walls subjected to blast risk. Eng Struct 127:559–582Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jin X, Wang Z, Ning J, Xiao G, Liu E, Shu X (2016) Dynamic response of sandwich structures with graded auxetic honeycomb cores under blast loading. Compos B Eng 106:206–217Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stochino F (2016) RC beams under blast load: reliability and sensitivity analysis. Eng Fail Anal 66:544–565Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Merrifield R (1993) Simplified calculations of blast induced injuries and damage. Health and Safety Executive, Technology and Health Sciences DivisionGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith PD, Hetherington JG (1994) Blast and ballistic loading of structures. Butterworth Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thiagarajan G, Rahimzadeh R, Kundu A (2013) Study of pressure–impulse diagrams for reinforced concrete columns using finite element analysis. Int J Protect Struct 4:485–504Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Syed ZI, Liew MS, Hasan MH, Venkatesan S (2014) Single-degree-of-freedom based pressure–impulse diagrams for blast damage assessment. Appl Mech Mater 567:499–504Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hamra L, Demonceau JF, Denoël V (2015) Pressure–impulse diagram of a beam developing non-linear membrane action under blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 86:188–205Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dragos J, Wu C, Haskett M, Oehlers D (2013) Derivation of normalized pressure impulse curves for flexural ultra high performance concrete slabs. J Struct Eng 139:875–885Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fallah AS, Nwankwo E, Louca LA (2013) Pressure–impulse diagrams for blast loaded continuous beams based on dimensional analysis. J Appl Mech 80(5):051011Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Colombo M, Martinelli P (2012) Pressure–impulse diagrams for RC and FRC circular plates under blast loads. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 16(7):837–862Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leppänen J (2006) Concrete subjected to projectile and fragment impacts: modelling of crack softening and strain rate dependency in tension. Int J Impact Eng 32:1828–1841Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gebbeken N, Ruppert M (2000) A new material model for concrete in high-dynamic hydrocode simulations. Arch Appl Mech 70:463–478zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    King KW, Wawclawczyk JH, Ozbey C (2009) Retrofit strategies to protect structures from blast loading. Can J Civ Eng 36(8):1345–1355Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Laskar A, Gu H, Mo YL, Song G (2009) Progressive collapse of a two-story reinforced concrete frame with embedded smart aggregates. Smart Mater Struct 18(7):075001Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mussa MH, Mutalib AA, Hamid R, Naidu SR, Radzi NAM, Abedini M (2017) Assessment of damage to an underground box tunnel by a surface explosion. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 66:64–76Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    TM5-855-1 (1986) Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons. In: US Department of Army. Headquarters, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    CONWEP (1993) US Army Corps of Engineers. In: Vicksburg, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peirovi S, Alipour R, Nejad AF (2015) Finite element analysis of micro scale laser bending of a steel sheet metal subjected to short pulse shock wave. Procedia Manuf 2:397–401Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu C, Hao H (2007) Numerical simulation of structural response and damage to simultaneous ground shock and airblast loads. Int J Impact Eng 34:556–572Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kingery CN, Bulmash G (1984) Airblast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst. ARBL-TR-02555. US Army Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen Proving Ground, AberdeenGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Siddiqui JI, Ahmad S (2007) Impulsive loading on a concrete structure. Proc Inst Civ Eng 160:231–241Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baker W, Cox P, Westine P, Kulesz J, Strehlow R (1983) Explosion hazards and evaluation. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alipour R, Najarian F (2011) “Modeling and investigation of elongation in free explosive forming of aluminum alloy plate. Proc. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 76:490–493Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Alipour R (2011) finite element analysis of elongation in free explosive forming of aluminum alloy blanks using CEL method. Int Rev Mech Eng 5:1039–1042MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. AUTODYN (2009) Interactive non-linear dynamic analysis software, version 12, user’s manual. SAS IP Inc, CanonsburgGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    LS-DYNA (2015) Keyword user’s manual V971. CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), LivermoreGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    ANSYS/LS-DYNA (2013) User’s manual (version 14.0). ANSYS Inc, CanonsburgGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    ABAQUS (2014) Analysis User’s Manual, Version 6.9.1. ABAQUS, IncGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tabatabaei ZS, Volz JS (2012) A comparison between three different blast methods in LS-DYNA®: LBE, MM-ALE, Coupling of LBE and MM-ALE. In: 12th International LS-DYNA user conferenceGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Abedini M, Mutalib AA, Raman SN, Akhlaghi E (2018) Modeling the effects of high strain rate loading on RC columns using Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) technique. Rev Int Métodos Numér Cálc Diseño Ing.  https://doi.org/10.23967/j.rimni.2017.12.001
  40. 40.
    Remennikov AM (2003) A review of methods for predicting bomb blast effects on buildings. J Battlef Technol 6(3):5Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shi Y, Hao H, Li Z-X (2008) Numerical derivation of pressure–impulse diagrams for prediction of RC column damage to blast loads. Int J Impact Eng 35:1213–1227Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mutalib AA, Hao H (2011) Development of P–I diagrams for FRP strengthened RC columns. Int J Impact Eng 38:290–304Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Alipour R, Izman S, Tamin MN (2014) Estimation of charge mass for high speed forming of circular plates using energy method. In: Advanced materials research, pp 803–808Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Louca L, Friis J, Carney SJ (2002) Response to explosions. Imperial College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Iqbal J (2009) Effects of an external explosion on a concrete structure. Ph.D. UET Taxila Pakistan, TaxilaGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Alipour R, Najarian F (2011) A FEM study of explosive welding of double layer tubes. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 73:954–956Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Alipour R, Frokhi Nejad A, Izman S, Tamin M (2015) Computer aided design and analysis of conical forming dies subjected to blast load. In: Applied mechanics and materials, 2015, pp 50–56Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Izman S, Nejad AF, Alipour R, Tamin M, Najarian F (2015) Topology optimization of an asymmetric elliptical cone subjected to blast loading. Procedia Manuf 2:319–324Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sadovskyi MA (1952) Mechanical effects of air shock waves from explosions according to experiments. Moskau, Izd Akad Nauk SSSR, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Krauthammer T (1999) Blast effects and related threats. Penn State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Alipour R, Mostajiri K, Golshkooh I, Najarian F (2009) Explosive welding simulation of double layer tubes (7039 Aluminium-4340 steel). In: NMEC02, Najafabad, IranGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Abedini M, Mutalib AA, Raman SN, Akhlaghi E, Mussa MH, Ansari M (2017) Numerical investigation on the non-linear response of reinforced concrete (RC) columns subjected to extreme dynamic loads. J Asian Sci Res 7:86Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Smith SJ, McCann DM, Kamara ME (2009) Blast resistant design guide for reinforced concrete structures. Portland Cement Association, SkokieGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Masoud Abedini SNR, Mutalib AA (2015) Numerical analysis of the behaviour of reinforced concrete columns subjected to blast loading. In: The 7th Asia Pacific young researchers & graduates symposium (YRGS 2015), 2015, pp 289–299Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Abedini M, Mutalib AA, Raman SN (2017) PI diagram generation for reinforced concrete (RC) columns under high impulsive loads using ale method. J Asian Sci Res 7:253Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Abedini M, Mutalib AA, Baharom S, Hao H (2013) Reliability analysis of PI diagram formula for RC column subjected to blast load. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering 7:589–593Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Krauthammer T (2008) Modern protective structures. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Abrahamson GR, Lindberg HE (1976) Peak load-impulse characterization of critical pulse loads in structural dynamics. Nucl Eng Des 37:35–46Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Canadian Standards Association (CSA) (2012) Design and assessment of buildings subjected to blast loads. CSA 850-12, Mississauga, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cormie D, Mays C, Smith P (2009) Blast effects on buildings, 2nd edn. Thomas Telford Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Soh T, Krauthammer T (2004) Load–impulse diagrams of reinforced concrete beams subjected to concentrated transient loading. Technical report PTC-TR-006-2004. Protective Technology Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rhijnsburger MPM, van Deursen JR, van Doormaal JCAM (2002) Development of a toolbox suitable for dynamic response analysis of simplified structures. Presented at the 30th DoD Explosives Safety Seminar, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Li Q, Meng H (2002) Pressure–impulse diagram for blast loads based on dimensional analysis and single-degree-of-freedom model. J Eng Mech 128:87–92Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mays GC, Smith PD (1995) Blast effects on buildings; Design of buildings to optimize resistance to blast loading. Thomas Telford, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    FEMA426 (2003) Reference manual to mitigate potential terrorist attacks against buildings. In: Risk management series. US Department of Homeland Security, Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Krauthammer T, Astarlioglu S, Blasko J, Soh TB, Ng PH (2008) Pressure–impulse diagrams for the behavior assessment of structural components. Int J Impact Eng 35:771–783Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Shope RL (2007) Comparisons of an alternative pressure–impulse (P–I) formulation with experimental and finite element results. In: The international symposium on the effects of munitions with structures (ISIEMS), vol 12.1, 2007Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ngo T, Mendis P, Gupta A, Ramsay J (2007) Blast loading and blast effects on structures—an overview. eJSE 7:76–91Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sorensen A, McGill WL (2011) What to look for in the aftermath of an explosion? A review of blast scene damage observables. Eng Fail Anal 18:836–845Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Krauthammer T, Shahriar S, Shanaa HM (1990) Response of reinforced concrete elements to severe impulsive loads. J Struct Eng 116:1061–1079Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Krauthammer T (2008) Pressure–impulse diagrams and their applications. In: Modern protective structures, civil and environmental engineering. CRC Press, 2008, pp 325–371Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Fujikura S, Bruneau M (2011) Experimental investigation of seismically resistant bridge piers under blast loading. J Bridge Eng 16:63–71Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ngo, T. D. (2005). Behaviour of high strength concrete subject to impulsive loading. PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Riedel W, Mayrhofer C, Thoma K, Stolz A (2010) Engineering and numerical tools for explosion protection of reinforced concrete. Int J Protect Struct 1:85–102Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Weerheijm J, Mediavilla J, Doormaal JCAM (2008) Damage and residual strength prediction of blast loaded RC panels. TNO Defence, Security and Safety, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Muszynski LC, Purcell MR (2003) Use of composite reinforcement to strengthen concrete and air-entrained concrete masonry walls against air blast. J Compos Constr 7:98–108Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ma GW, Shi HJ, Shu DW (2007) P–I diagram method for combined failure modes of rigid-plastic beams. Int J Impact Eng 34:1081–1094Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Menkes SB, Opat HJ (1973) Tearing and shear failures in explosively loaded clamped beams. Exp Mech 13:480–486Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Teeling-Smith RG, Nurick GN (1991) The deformation and tearing of thin circular plates subjected to impulsive loads. Int J Impact Eng 11:77–91Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Nurick GN, Shave GC (1996) The deformation and rupture of blast loaded square plates. Int J Impact Eng 18:99–116Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Olson MD, Nurick GN, Fagnan JR (1993) Deformation and rupture of blast loaded square plates—predictions and experiments. Int J Impact Eng 1993:2Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ma GW, Huang X, Li JC (2010) Simplified damage assessment method for buried structures against external blast load. J Struct Eng 136:603–612Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ma G, Huang X, Li J (2008) Damage assessment for buried structures against internal blast load. Trans Tianjin Univ 14:353–357Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kappos AJ (1997) Seismic damage indices for RC buildings: evaluation of concept and procedures. Struct Eng Mater 1–1:78–87Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Sasani M (2008) Response of a reinforced concrete infilled-frame structure to removal of two adjacent columns. Eng Struct 30:2478–2491Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Williams MS, Villemure I, Sexsmith RG (1997) Evaluation of seismic damage indices for concrete elements loaded in combined shear and flexure. ACI Struct J 94:315–322Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Golafshani A, Bakhshi A, Tabeshpour MR (2005) Vulnerability and damage analysis of existing buildings. Asian J Civ Eng (Build Hous) 6:85–100Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Biggs JM (1964) Introduction to structural dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Mendis P, Ngo T (2005) Vibration and shock problems of civil engineering structures. In: de Silva CW (ed) Mechanical engineering series, 2005, pp 1–58Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Fallah AS, Louca LA (2007) Pressure–impulse diagrams for elastic-plastic-hardening and softening single-degree-of-freedom models subjected to blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 34:823–842Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Abedini M, Mutalib AA, Raman SN, Baharom S, Nouri JS (2017) Prediction of residual axial load carrying capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) columns subjected to extreme dynamic loads. Am J Eng Appl Sci 10:431–448Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Cui J, Shi Y, Li Z-X, Chen L (2015) Failure analysis and damage assessment of rc columns under close-in explosions. J Perform Constr Facil 29:B4015003Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Shi Y, Stewart MG (2015) Damage and risk assessment for reinforced concrete wall panels subjected to explosive blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 85:5–19Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Wang W, Zhang D, Lu F, Wang S-C, Tang F (2013) Experimental study and numerical simulation of the damage mode of a square reinforced concrete slab under close-in explosion. Eng Fail Anal 27:41–51Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Syed ZI, Mendis P, Lam NT, Ngo T (2006) Concrete damage assessment for blast load using pressure–impulse diagrams. In: Earthquake engineering in Australia, Canberra, pp 24–26Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zhou X, Kuznetsov V, Hao H, Waschl J (2008) Numerical prediction of concrete slab response to blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 35:1186–1200Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Shope RL (2007) Comparisons of an alternative pressure–impulse (P–I) formulation with experimental and finite element results. In: The international symposium on the effects of munitions with structures (ISIEMS) 12.1, 2007Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Qasrawi Y, Heffernan PJ, Fam A (2014) Performance of concrete-filled FRP tubes under field close-in blast loading. J Compos Constr 19:04014067Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Qasrawi Y, Heffernan PJ, Fam A (2015) Numerical modeling of concrete-filled FRP tubes’ dynamic behavior under blast and impact loading. J Struct Eng 142:04015106Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Wang Y, Xiong M-X (2015) Analysis of axially restrained water storage tank under blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 86:167–178Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Xu J, Wu C, Li Z-X (2014) Analysis of direct shear failure mode for RC slabs under external explosive loading. Int J Impact Eng 69:136–148Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Dragos J, Wu C (2014) Interaction between direct shear and flexural responses for blast loaded one-way reinforced concrete slabs using a finite element model. Eng Struct 72:193–202Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Syed ZI, Liew MS, Hasan MH, Venkatesan S (2014) Single-degree-of-freedom based pressure–impulse diagrams for blast damage assessment. Appl Mech Mater 576:499–504Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Hamra L, Demonceau J-F, Denoël V (2014) Pressure–impulse diagram of a beam under explosion-Influence of the indirectly affected part. In: EUROSTEEL 2014Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Dragos J, Wu C (2013) A new general approach to derive normalised pressure impulse curves. Int J Impact Eng 62:1–12Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Wang W, Zhang D, Lu F, Wang SC, Tang F (2012) The effect of span length to height ratio of reinforced concrete slabs on pressure–impulse diagram with multiple failure modes under blast loading. EDP Sci 26:1–5Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Anderson T, Kostecki J (2012) Load shape influence on dynamic structural response. Struct Congr 2012:201–212Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Huang X, Ma GW, Li JC (2010) Damage assessment of reinforced concrete structural elements subjected to blast load. Int J Protect Struct 1(1):103–124Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    El-Dakhakhni W, Mekky W, Rezaei S (2010) Validity of SDOF models for analyzing two-way reinforced concrete panels under blast loading. J Perform Constr Facil 24(4):311–325Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    El-Dakhakhni WW, Mekky WF, Changiz-Rezaei SH (2009) Vulnerability screening and capacity assessment of reinforced concrete columns subjected to blast. J Perform Constr Facil 23:353–365Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    SBEDS (2008) Single degree of freedom blast design spreadsheet (SBEDS) methodology manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Protective Design Center Technical Report PDC-TR 06-01 Rev 1, 2008Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Blasko J, Krauthammer T, Astarlioglu S (2007) Pressure–impulse diagrams for structural elements subjected to dynamic loads. Technical report PTC-TR-002-2007. Protective Technology Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Campidelli M, Viola E (2007) An analytical–numerical method to analyze single degree of freedom models under airblast loading. J Sound Vib 302(1–2):260–286Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Schleyer GK, Langdon GS (2006) Pulse pressure testing of 1/4 scale blast wall panels with connections, phase II. (HSE) Health & Safety ExecutivesGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Naito C, Wheaton K (2006) Blast assessment of load-bearing reinforced concrete shear walls. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 11:112–121Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Li Q, Jones N (2005) Foundation of correlation parameters for eliminating pulse shape effects on dynamic plastic response of structures. J Appl Mech 72:172–176zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Florek J, Benaroya H (2005) Pulse–pressure loading effects on aviation and general engineering structures—review. J Sound Vib 284:421–453Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Ng, P. H. (2004). Pressure-impulse Diagrams for Reinforced Concrete Slabs, Final Report to U.S Army, ERDC, PTC-TR-007, Protective Technology Center, Pennsylvania State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Schleyer G, Langdon G (2003) G. B. Health, S. Executive, and U. o. Liverpool, Pulse pressure testing of 1 = 4 scale blast wall panels with connections: HSE Research Report 124, 2003Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Li QM, Meng H (2002) Pulse loading shape effects on pressure–impulse diagram of an elastic–plastic, single-degree-of-freedom structural model. Int J Mech Sci 44:1985–1998zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Oswald C, Sherkut D (1994) FACEDAP theory manual, Version 1.2. Omaha. US Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, NebraskaGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Zhu G, Huang Y-G, Yu T, Wang R (1986) Estimation of the plastic structural response under impact. Int J Impact Eng 4:271–282Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Vaziri R, Olson M, Anderson D (1987) Dynamic response of axially constrained plastic beams to blast loads. Int J Solids Struct 23:153–174zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Youngdahl C (1970) Correlation parameters for eliminating the effect of pulse shape on dynamic plastic deformation. J Appl Mech 37:744–752zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Morison CM (2006) Dynamic response of walls and slabs by single-degree-of-freedom analysis—a critical review and revision. Int J Impact Eng 32:1214–1247Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Shi Y, Li Z-X, Hao H (2009) Bond slip modelling and its effect on numerical analysis of blast-induced responses of RC columns. Struct Eng Mech 32:251–267Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    UFC-4-010-01 (2013) Minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings. US Army Corps of Engineers, Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Air Force Civil Engineer Center, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Wijesundara G, Clubley S (2016) Damage state identification for reinforced concrete columns in uplift due to internal building detonations. Eng Struct 127:804–823Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Codina R, Ambrosini D, de Borbón F (2016) Experimental and numerical study of a RC member under a close-in blast loading. Eng Struct 127:145–158Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Hao H, Li Z-X, Shi Y (2015) Reliability analysis of RC columns and frame with FRP strengthening subjected to explosive loads. J Perform Constr Facil 30:04015017Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Thiagarajan G, Kadambi AV, Robert S, Johnson CF (2015) Experimental and finite element analysis of doubly reinforced concrete slabs subjected to blast loads. Int J Impact Eng 75:162–173Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Astarlioglu S, Krauthammer T (2014) Response of normal-strength and ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete columns to idealized blast loads. Eng Struct 61:1–12Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Sohn JM, Kim SJ, Seong DJ, Kim BJ, Ha YC, Seo JK et al (2014) Structural impact response characteristics of an explosion-resistant profiled blast walls in arctic conditions. Struct Eng Mech 51:755–771Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Xia Y, Wu C, Zhang F, Li Z-X, Bennett T (2014) Numerical analysis of foam-protected RC members under blast loads. Int J Protect Struct 5:367–390Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Shim C, Shin D-H, Yun N (2013) Pressure–impulse diagram of multi-layered aluminum foam panels under blast pressure. J Eng Sci Technol 8:285–300Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Astarlioglu S, Krauthammer T, Morency D, Tran TP (2013) Behavior of reinforced concrete columns under combined effects of axial and blast-induced transverse loads. Eng Struct 55:26–34Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Mutalib AA, Tawil NM, Baharom S, Abedini M (2013) Failure probabilities of FRP strengthened RC column to blast loads. J Teknol 65:135–141Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Aghdamy S, Wu C, Griffith M (2013) Simulation of retrofitted unreinforced concrete masonry unit walls under blast loading. Int J Protect Struct 4:21–44Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Mutalib AA, Abedini M, Baharom S, Hao H (2013) Derivation of empirical formulae to predict pressure and impulsive asymptotes for PI diagrams of one-way RC panels. In: Proceedings of world academy of science, engineering and technology, 2013, p 661Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Mutalib AA, Hao H (2011) The effect of anchorages on FRP strengthening of RC walls to resist blast loads. In: Applied mechanics and materials, 2011, pp 497–502Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Mutalib AA, Bakhary N (2011) Empirical formulae to predict pressure and impulsive asymptotes for P–I diagrams Of RC columns strengthened with FRP. J Teknol 55:27–38Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Bao X, Li B (2010) Residual strength of blast damaged reinforced concrete columns. Int J Impact Eng 37:295–308Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Mutalib AA, Hao H (2010) Numerical analysis of FRP-composite-strengthened RC panels with anchorages against blast loads. J Perform Constr Facil 25:360–372Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Slawson TR, Johnson CF, Davis JL (2004) Concrete masonry unit wall and retrofit analysis using simplified methods. In: Proceedings of the 2004 structures congress–building on the past: securing the future. Nashville, TN, USA, 2004, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Anti-Terrorism Planner (2001) U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MSGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Oswald C (2005) Prediction of injuries to building occupants from column failure and progressive collapse with the BICADS computer program. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ASCE Structures Congress and Exposition, 2005, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Aoude H, Dagenais FP, Burrell RP, Saatcioglu M (2015) Behavior of ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete columns under blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 80:185–202Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Parlin NJ, Davids WG, Nagy E, Cummins T (2014) Dynamic response of lightweight wood-based flexible wall panels to blast and impulse loading. Constr Build Mater 50:237–245Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Stolz A, Fischer K, Roller C, Hauser S (2014) Dynamic bearing capacity of ductile concrete plates under blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 69:25–38Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Thiagarajan G, Johnson CF (2014) Experimental behavior of reinforced concrete slabs subjected to shock loading. ACI Struct J 111:1407Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Fischer K, Häring I (2009) SDOF response model parameters from dynamic blast loading experiments. Eng Struct 31:1677–1686Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Wesevich J, Oswald C (2005) Empirical based concrete masonry pressure–impulse diagrams for varying degrees of damage. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, United States, New York, pp 2083–2094Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Baylot JT, Bullock B, Slawson TR, Woodson SC (2005) Blast response of lightly attached concrete masonry unit walls. J Struct Eng 131:1186–1193Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Mlakar PF Sr, Corley WG, Sozen MA, Thornton CH (1998) The Oklahoma City bombing: analysis of blast damage to the Murrah Building. J Perform Constr Facil 12:113–119Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Slawson TR (1984) Dynamic shear failure of shallow-buried flat-roofed reinforced concrete structures subjected to blast loading. DTIC Document 1984Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    FACEDAP (1994) Facility and component explosive damage assessment program. SwRI Project No. 06-5145-001, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, Omaha, vol. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, OmahaGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Feldman A, Keenan W, Siess CP (1962) Investigation of resistance and behavior of reinforced concrete members subjected to dynamic loading, part III. DTIC DocumentGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Structural EngineeringUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mahshahr BranchIslamic Azad UniversityMahshahrIran

Personalised recommendations