Advertisement

Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 805–806 | Cite as

Correction to: Aphid-induction of defence-related metabolites in Arabidopsis thaliana is dependent upon density, aphid species and duration of infestation

  • Simon HodgeEmail author
  • Mark Bennett
  • John W. Mansfield
  • Glen Powell
Correction
  • 156 Downloads

Correction to: Arthropod-Plant Interactions (2019) 13:387–399  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-018-9667-0

The authors would like to include the following changes in the published article.

The authors concede that errors were made in the nomenclature of the indole glucosinolates that make interpretation of results problematic.

The four generally-accepted indole glucosinolates in A. thaliana are: indol-3-ylmethylglucosinolate, 1-methoxyindol-3-ylmethylglucosinolate, 4-hydroxyindol-3-ylmethylglucosinolate and 4-methoxyindol-3-ylmethylglucosinolate (Brown et al. 2003). These four compounds were detected in our study, and not the mistyped 3-methoxy derivative, and the glucosinolate we abbreviated as 3MIND is actually the parent indole glucosinolate, indol-3-ylmethylglucosinolate. Another more minor issue was that the methylsulphinylalkyl glucosinolates and methylthioalkyl glucosinolates should have a bracket in their names to indicate that it is the entire group that is attached to position 4. Finally, all the glucosinolates should strictly have “glucosinolate” as the final part of their name. Therefore, Table 1 of the original manuscript required modification and should read as given below.

The authors also accept that the codes they have used for the glucosinolates are slightly unorthodox when compared to those used by other papers (e.g. Brown et al. 2003). However, these codes are used consistently throughout the paper, including all figures, so they are retained in Table 1 so that readers can more easily locate the appropriate compound from codes given in the script.
Table 1

Summary, classification and abbreviated codes of compounds extracted and measured from Arabidopsis foliage

Class and code

Compound

Hormones

 JA

Jasmonic acid

 ABA

Absicic acid

 SA

Salicylic acid

 SAGLY

Salicylate glycoside

Phytoalexin derivatives

 CAM

Camalexin

 CAMA

Dihydro-camalexic acid

Amino acids

 

 TRP

Tryptophan

 PHE

Phenylalanine

Flavonoids

 KRRG

Kaempferol–rhamnoside–rhamnoside–glycoside

 KRR

Kaempferol–rhamnoside–rhamnoside

 KGR

Kaempferol–glycoside–rhamnoside

Phenolic esters

 SM

Sinapoyl malate

 FM

Feruloyl malate

Indolyl glucosinolates

 1MIND

1-Methoxyindol-3-ylmethylglucosinolate

 3MIND

Indol-3-ylmethylglucosinolate

 4MIND

4-Hydroxyindol-3-ylmethylglucosinolate

 4HIND

4-Methoxyindol-3-ylmethylglucosinolate

Aliphatic glucosinolates

 3MSUL

3-(Methylsulphinyl)propyl glucosinolate

 4MSUL

4-(Methylsulphinyl)butyl glucosinolate

 5MSUL

5-(Methylsulphinyl)pentyl glucosinolate

 6MSUL

6-(Methylsulphinyl)hexyl glucosinolate

 7MSUL

7-(Methylsulphinyl)heptyl glucosinolate

 8MSUL

8-(Methylsulphinyl)octyl glucosinolate

 4MTHI

4-(Methylthio)butyl glucosinolate

 5MTHI

5-(Methylthio)pentyl glucosinolate

 7MTHI

7-(Methylthio)heptyl glucosinolate

 8MTHI

8-(Methylthio)octyl glucosinolate

Overall, given these problems with nomenclature, the findings reported concerning the effects of aphids on Arabidopsis glucosinolates still make sense in terms of known glucosinolate biosynthesis pathways. The aphid-induced decrease of two indole glucosinolates (3MIND and 4HIND) and increase of another (4MIND) would appear correct according to the biosynthesis pathway of 3MIND → 4HIND → 4MIND (using our codes) given by Pfalz et al. (2016; see also Kim and Jander 2007). Foliage concentrations of 1MIND tended not to show strong or systematic changes when plants were challenged by aphids, which also makes sense as this compound is branched from this biosynthesis pathway (Pfalz et al. 2016).

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Associate Professor Niels Agerbirk and Dr John Rossiter for insightful discussion and advice on these issues.

References

  1. Brown PD, Tokuhisa JG, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J (2003) Variation of glucosinolate accumulation among different organs and developmental stages of Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 62:471–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim JH, Jander G (2007) Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) feeding on Arabidopsis induces the formation of a deterrent indole glucosinolate. Plant J 49:1008–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Pfalz M, Mukhaimar M, Perreau F, Kirk J, Hansen CIC, Olsen CE, Agerbirk N, Kroymann J (2016) Methyl transfer in glucosinolate biosynthesis mediated by indole glucosinolate O-methyltransferase 5. Plant Physiol 172:2190–2203CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of BiologyImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Future Farming CentreLincoln UniversityCanterburyNew Zealand
  3. 3.NIAB EMREast MallingUK

Personalised recommendations