Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 757–770 | Cite as

Influence of grazing intensity on patterns and structuring processes in plant–pollinator networks in a subtropical grassland

  • Suiane Santos OlequesEmail author
  • Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni
  • Gerhard Ernst Overbeck
Original Paper


Understanding how disturbances influence interaction networks is a central but still poorly explored issue in ecology and management. The goal of this study was to test how the structure of plant–pollinator networks and the structuring processes are influenced by grazing in a subtropical grassland community on the southern hemisphere. Twelve sampling plots were allocated in order to cover a grazing gradient ranging from overgrazed to ungrazed sites. For each plot, we created a quantitative matrix containing all observed pairwise insect–plant interactions and described morphology, phenology and abundances of each species. We fitted a series of models to test the influence of grazing intensity on metrics describing networks structure. We finally used probabilistic matrices, maximum likelihood and model selection to investigate the processes influencing frequencies of interactions across the gradient of disturbance. Grazing intensity influenced connectance, specialization and interaction evenness, while the number of species and links, nestedness and modularity were less variable. Species abundance was the most important determinant of interaction frequencies regardless of grazing intensity. In contrast to northern hemisphere pollination networks studied so far, these subtropical plant–pollinator networks and their structuring processes were remarkably consistent along the grazing gradient. We argue that this results from the dominance of generalist Asteraceae species, which are selectively avoided by cattle and play a core role in attracting a wide range of pollinators and thereby structuring plant–pollinator interactions, providing therefore stability.


Asteraceae Grazing management Interactions network Moderate disturbance Land use 



We thank G. Minervini for field work support, M. Pinheiro (bees), B.R. Garcete-Barret (wasps), J. Duarte (flies), M. Morales (flies-Syrphidae), M.S. Pires (ants), N. Mega (butterflies) and D. Lucas (plants) for their help with species identification and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. We also thank Stephen Tyndel for valuable suggestions on the manuscript and linguistic edits. This work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) funding [grant number 403750/2012-1], [grant number 477618/2013-8] and in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001. SSO received a Master scholarship from CNPq and GEO a CNPq Grant [310022/2015-0]. JVB thank to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the CERL-ERDC (Construction Engineering Research Lab of the Engineer Research & Development Center) for financial support.

Supplementary material

11829_2019_9699_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (219 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 219 kb)
11829_2019_9699_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (328 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 327 kb)
11829_2019_9699_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (715 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 714 kb)
11829_2019_9699_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (556 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 555 kb)
11829_2019_9699_MOESM5_ESM.tif (2.8 mb)
Supplementary material 5 (TIFF 2903 kb)
11829_2019_9699_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (57 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (XLSX 57 kb)


  1. Adler P, Lauenroth W (1998) The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation. Oecologia 4:465–479Google Scholar
  2. Aizen AM, Feisinger P (1994) Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology 75:330–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida-Neto M, Ulrich W (2011) A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices. Environ Model Softw 26:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrade BO, Bonilha CL, Overbeck GE et al (2019) Classification of South Brazilian grasslands: implications for conservation. Appl Veg Sci 1:1–10. Google Scholar
  5. Antonini Y, Martins RP (2003) The flowering- visiting bees at the Ecological Station of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 32:565–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashman TL, King EA (2005) Are flower-visiting ants mutualists or antagonists? A study in a gynodioecious wild strawberry. Am J Bot 92:891–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker DL, Guthery ES (1990) Effects of continuous grazing on habitat and density of ground-foraging birds in south Texas. J Range Manag 43:2–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldissera R, Fritz L, Rauber R, Muller SC (2010) Comparison between grassland communities with and without disturbances. Neotrop Biol Conserv 5:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bascompte J, Jordano P (2007) Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: the Architecture of Biodiversity. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:567–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ, Olesen JM (2003) The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. PNAS 100(16):9383–9387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bascompte J, Jordano P, Olesen JM (2006) Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312:431–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Basilio AM, Medan D, Torreta JP, Bartoloni NJ (2006) A year-long plant-pollinator network. Austral Ecol 31:975–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bastazini VAG, Ferreira PMA, Azambuja BO, Casas G, Debastiani VJ, Guimarães PR, Pillar VD (2017) Untangling the tangled bank: a novel method for partitioning the effects of phylogenies and traits on ecological networks. Evol Biol 44:312–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ben Bolker and R Development Core Team (2014) bbmle: Tools for general maximum likelihood estimation. R package version 1.0.17.
  15. Beretta ME, Fernandes AC, Schneider AA, Ritter MR (2008) A família Asteraceae no Parque Estadual de Itapuã, Viamão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Braz J Biosci 6:189–216Google Scholar
  16. Blancafort X, Gómez C (2005) Consequences of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr), invasion on pollination of Euphorbia characias (L.) (Euphorbiaceae). Oecologia 28:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blüthgen N, Fründ J, Vásquez DP, Menzel F (2008) What do interaction networks metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? Ecology 89:3387–3399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boldrini II, Eggers L (1996) Vegetação campestre do sul do Brasil: resposta e dinâmica de espécies à exclusão. Acta Bot Bras 10:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Cingolani AM, Posse G, Collantes MB (2005) Plant functional traits, herbivore selectivity and response to sheep grazing in Patagonian steppe grasslands. J Appl Ecol 42:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot R, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Suttonkk P, Van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cruz CEF, Karam FC, Dalto AC, Pavarini SP, Bandarra PM, Driemeier D (2010) Fireweed (Senecio madagascariensis) poisoning in cattle. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira
  23. Dalsgaard B, Schleuning M, Maruyama PK, Dehling DM, Sonne J, Vizentin-Bugoni J, Zanata TB, Fjeldså J, Böhning-Gaese K, Rahbek C (2017) Opposed latitudinal patterns of network-derived and dietary specialization in avian plant–frugivore interaction systems. Ecography 40:1395–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Develey PF, Setubal RB, Dias RA, Bencke GA (2008) Conservação das aves e da biodiversidade no bioma pampa aliada a sistemas de produção animal. Rev Bras Ornitol 16:308–315Google Scholar
  25. Dias et al (2017) Livestock disturbance in Brazilian grasslands influences avian species diversity via turnover. Biodivers Conserv 226:2473–2490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dorman CF, Strauss R (2014) A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks. Methods Ecol Evol 5:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dorman CF, Gruber B, Frund J (2008) Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News 8:8–11Google Scholar
  28. Dutton EM, Frederinckson ME (2012) Why ant pollination is rare: new evidence and implications of the antibiotic hypothesis. Arthropod Plant Interaction 6:569–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Edwards AM, Auger-Méthé M (2018) Some guidance on using mathematical notation in ecology. Methods Ecol Evol 1:1–10. Google Scholar
  30. Essenberg CJ (2013) Explaining the Effects of floral density on flower visitor species composition. Am Nat 181:344–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fontaine C, Dajoz I, Meriguet J, Loreau M (2005) Functional diversity of plant-pollinator interaction webs enhances the persistence of plant communities. PLoS Biol 1:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. García D, Hódar JA, Zamora R, Gómez JM (1996) Experimental study of pollination by ants in Mediterranean high mountain and arid habitats. Oecologia 105:236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gómez JM (2000) Effectiveness of ants as pollinators of Lobularia maritima: effects on main sequential fitness components of the host plant. Oecologia 122:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grant SA, Torvell L, Sim EM, Small JL, Armstrong RH (1996) Controlled grazing studies on nardus grassland: effects of between-tussock sward height and species of grazer on nardus utilization and floristic composition in two fields in scotland. J Appl Ecol 5:1053–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hadar L, Noy-Meir I, Perevolotsky A (2009) The effect of shrub clearing and grazing on the composition of a Mediterranean plant community: functional groups versus species. J Veg Sci 10:673–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heleno R, Devoto M, Pocock M (2012) Connectance of species interaction networks and conservation value: is it any good to be well connected? Ecol Ind 14:7–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Herrera CM, Herrera J, Espalander X (1984) Nectar thievery by ants from southern Spanish insect-pollinated flowers. Insectes Soc 2:142–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Isselstein J, Jeangros B, Pavlu V (2005) Agronomic aspect of biodiversity targeted management of temperate grassland in Europe—a review. Agron Res 3:139–151Google Scholar
  39. Junges AH, Bremm C, Fontana DC, Oliveira CAO, Schaparini LP, Carvalho PCF (2016) Temporal profiles of vegetation indices for characterizing grazing intensity on natural grasslands in Pampa biome. Sci Agric 73:332–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Blüthgen N (2015) Integrating network ecology with applied conservation: a synthesis and guide to implementation. AoB Plants 1:1–10. Google Scholar
  41. Klein AM, Vaissiére BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc Royal Soc B 274:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Krishna A, Guimarães PR Jr, Jordano P, Bascompte J (2008) A neutral-niche theory of nestedness in mutualistic networks. Oikos 117:1609–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lara-Romero C, García C, Iriondo JM (2015) Direct and indirect effects of shrub encroachment on alpine grasslands mediated by plant-flower-visitor interactions. Funct Ecol 1:1–10. Google Scholar
  44. Lázaro A, Tscheulin T, Devalez J, Nakas G, Stefanaki A, Hanlidou E, Petanidou T (2016) Moderation is best: effects of grazing intensity on plant–flower visitor networks in Mediterranean communities. Ecol Appl. Google Scholar
  45. Lupatini M, Jacques RJS, Antoniolli ZI, Suleiman AKA, Fulthorpe RR, Roesch LFW (2013) Land-use change and soil type are drivers of fungal and archaeal communities in the Pampa biome. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mabry TM, Jones SB, Burnett WC (1977) Evolutionary implications of sesquiterpene lactones in Vernonia (Compositae) and Mammalian Herbivores. Taxon 26:203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martín-Gonzáles AM, Dalsgaard B, Nogués-Bravo D, Graham CH et al (2015) The macroecology of phylogenetically structured hummingbird-plant networks. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. Google Scholar
  48. Mayer C, Soka G, Picker M (2006) The importance of monkey beetle (Scarabaeidae: Hopliini) pollination for Aizoaceae and Asteraceae in grazed and ungrazed areas at Paulshoek, Succulent Karoo, South Africa. J Insect Conserv 10:323–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Memmot J (1999) The structure of a plant-pollinator food web. Ecol Lett 2:276–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Milchunas DG, Sala OE, Laurenroth WK (1988) A Generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. Am Nat 132:87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moeller DA, Geber M, Eckhart V, Tiffin P (2012) Reduced pollinator service and elevated pollen limitation at the geographic range limit of an annual plant. Ecology 93:1036–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nabinger C, de Moraes A, Maraschin GE (2000) Campos in Southern Brazil. In: Lemaire G, Hodgson J, Moraes A, Carvalho PC, Nabinger Ceditors (eds). Grassland Ecophysiology and Grazing Ecology. CABI, New York (USA), pp 355–376Google Scholar
  53. Nielsen A, Bascompte J (2007) Ecological networks, nestedness and sampling effort. J Ecol 95:1134–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nielsen A, Totland Ø (2013) Structural properties of mutualistic networks withstand habitat degradation while species functional roles might change. Oikos 123:323–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Okuyama T, Holland JN (2008) Network structural properties mediate the stability of mutualistic communities. Ecol Lett 11:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oleques SS, Overbeck GE, de Avila Jr RS (2017) Flowering phenology and plant-pollinator interactions in a grassland community of Southern Brazil. Flora 229:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Dupont YL, Jordano P (2007) The modularity of pollination networks. PNAS 104(50):19891–19896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Olff H, Ritchie M (1998) Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Olito C, Fox JW (2015) Species traits and abundances predict metrics of plant-pollinator network structure, but not pairwise interactions. Oikos 124:428–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Overbeck GE, Muller SC, Pillar VD, Pfandenhauer J (2005) Fine-scale post-fire dynamics in southern Brazilian subtropical grassland. J Veg Sci 16:655–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Overbeck G, Muller SC, Fidelis A, Pfadenhauer J, Pillar DV, Blanco CC, Boldrini II, Both R, Forneck D (2007) Brazil’s neglected biome: the South Brazilian Campos. Perspect Plant Ecol 9:101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pillar VD, Focht T (2003) Spatial patterns and relations with site factors in a grassland under grazing. Braz J Biol. Google Scholar
  63. Pinheiro M, Abrão BE, Harter-Marques B, Miotto STS (2008) Floral resources used by insects in a grassland community in Southern Brazil. Braz J Bot 1:1–10. Google Scholar
  64. Podgaiski LR, Joner F, Lavorel S, Moretti M, Ibanez S, Mendonça MM Jr, Pillar VD (2013) Spider trait assembly patterns and resilience under fire-induced vegetation change in south brazilian grasslands. PLoS ONE. Google Scholar
  65. Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pykälä J (2004) Cattle grazing increases plant species richness of most species trait groups in mesic semi-natural grasslands. Plant Ecol 175:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rutter SM (2006) Diet preference for grass and legumes in free-ranging domestic sheep and cattle: current theory and future application. Appl Anim Behav Sci 97:17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Santamaría L, Rodríguez-Gironés MA (2007) Linkage rules for plant-pollinator networks: trait complementarity or exploitation barriers? PLoS Biol 5:e31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Soares AB, Carvalho PCF, Nabinger C, Semmelmann C, Trindade JK, Guerra E, Freitas TS, Pinto CE, Fontouta-Júnior A, Frizzo A (2005) Produção animal e de forragem em pastagem nativa submetida a distintas ofertas de forragem. Ciência Rural 35:1148–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Spieman BJ, Inouye BD (2013) Habitat loss alters the architecture of plant—pollinator interaction networks. Ecology 94:2688–2696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thébault E, Fontaine C (2010) Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 329:853–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Torres C, Galleto L (2002) Are nectar-sugar composition and corolla-tube length related to the diversity of insects that visit Asteraceae flowers? Plant Biol 4:360–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. TscharntkeT Tylianakis J (2010) Conserving complexity: global change and community-scale interactions. Biol Conserv 143:2249–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tylianakis JM, Tscharntke T, Lewis OT (2007) Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host-parasitoid food webs. Nature 445:202–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vanbergen AJ, Woodcock BA, Gray A, Grant F, Telford A, Lambdon P, Chapman DS, Pywell RF, Hear MS, Cavers S (2013) Grazing alters insect visitation networks and plant mating systems. Funct Ecol 28:178–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vavra M, Parks CG, Wisdom MJ (2007) Biodiversity, exotic plant species, and herbivory: the good, the bad, and the ungulate. For Ecol Manag 246:66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vázquez DP, Simberloff D (2004) Indirect effects of an introduced ungulate on pollination and plant reproduction. Ecol Monogr 74:281–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vázquez DP, Melián CJ, Williams NM, BlüthgenN Krasnov BR, Poulin R (2007) Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. Oikos 116:1120–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vázquez DP, Blüthgen N, Cagnolo L, Chacoff NP (2009a) Uniting pattern and process in plant-animal mutualistic networks: a review. Ann Bot 103:1445–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vázquez DP, Chacoff N, Cagnolo L (2009b) Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of mutualistic networks. Ecology 90:2039–2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vizentin-Bugoni J, Maruyama PK, Sazima M (2014) Processes entangling interactions in communities: forbidden links are more important than abundance in a hummingbird-plant network. Proc Royal Soc B. Google Scholar
  82. Vizentin-Bugoni J, Maruyama PK, Souza CS, Ollerton J, Rech AR, Sazima M (2018) Plant-pollinator networks in the tropics: a review. In: Dáttilo W, Rico-Gray V, Ecological networks in the tropics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  83. Vulliamy B, Potts SG, Willmer PG (2006) The effects of cattle grazing on plant-pollinator communities in a fragmented Mediterranean landscape. Oikos 114:529–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Welti EAR, Joern Anthony (2017) Fire and grazing modulate the structure and resistance of plant–floral visitor networks in a tallgrass prairie. Oecologia. Google Scholar
  85. Westerkamp C (1991) Honeybees are poor pollinators—Why? Plant Syst Evol 177:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wolowski M, Cavalheiro LG, Freitas L (2016) Influence of plant–pollinator interactions on the assembly of plant and hummingbird communities. J Ecol. Google Scholar
  87. Yoshihara Y, Chimeddorj B, Buuveibaatar B, Lhagvasuren B, Takatsukid S (2008) Effects of livestock grazing on pollination on a steppe in eastern Mongolia. Biol Conserv 1419:2376–2386CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Programa de Pós-graduação em BotânicaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  3. 3.Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de BiociênciasUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations