Advertisement

Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 797–803 | Cite as

The influence of leaf ontogenetic stage and plant reproductive phenology on trichome density and constitutive resistance in six tomato varieties

  • Dane Mymko
  • Germán Avila-SakarEmail author
Original Paper
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

Among other functions, trichomes defend plants against herbivores. Based on resource allocation theory, we hypothesized that foliar trichome density is determined by the balance between the fitness benefits and costs of trichome production, including possible resource allocation trade-offs with other functions, all of which may change with ontogeny and reproductive phenology. To assess the benefits and possible allocation trade-offs of trichome production, we examined the degree to which trichomes confer resistance against herbivores, and tested whether trichome density and resistance change with leaf ontogeny and with fruit production. Using six tomato varieties, we determined trichome density and tested for constitutive resistance of unexpanded and expanded leaves sampled from plants at their vegetative and reproductive stages by means of choice bioassays with a generalist caterpillar. We found a positive association between trichome density and resistance, albeit the relation was saturating rather than simple linear. Unexpanded leaves had greater trichome density and resistance than expanded leaves in vegetative plants. No such ontogenetic pattern was seen in reproductive plants. Trichome density of expanded leaves of reproductive plants did not differ significantly from that of unexpanded leaves of either vegetative or reproductive plants. Lastly, varieties with greater seed production had lower resistance. Such a clear trade-off suggests a high cost of resistance, which may have important implications for crop improvement programs.

Keywords

Herbivory Mechanical defence Resistance Trade-offs Trichoplusia ni 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Sreedevi Ramachandran and Mark Rondeau for their help with plant care and to Ian Russell for helping with the larvae cultures and data collection. This work was supported in part by the University of Winnipeg through an internal grant to GAS, and by a crowdfunding project from the University of Winnipeg Foundation. Thanks to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped us improve this paper.

Supplementary material

11829_2019_9690_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (54 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 54 KB)
11829_2019_9690_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (57 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 57 KB)

References

  1. Avery PB, Kumar V, Simmonds MS, Faull J (2015) Influence of leaf trichome type and density on the host plant selection by the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Appl Entomol Zool 50:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergau N, Bennewitz S, Syrowatka F, Hause G, Tissier A (2015) The development of type VI glandular trichomes in the cultivated tomato Solanum lycopersicum and a related wild species S. habrochaites. BMC Plant Biol 15:289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Björkman C, Dalin P, Ahrné K (2008) Leaf trichome responses to herbivory in willows: induction, relaxation and costs. New Phytol 179:176–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang J et al (2016) Fine mapping of the dialytic gene that controls multicellular trichome formation and stamen development in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 129:1531–1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coley PD, Kursar TA, Mulkey SS, Chazdon RL, Smith AP (1996) Anti-herbivore defenses of young tropical leaves: physiological constraints and ecological trade-offs. In: Tropical forest plant ecophysiology. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 305–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL (2005) Evolutionary ecology of plant reproductive strategies. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Degenhardt J, Gershenzon J, Baldwin IT, Kessler A (2003) Attracting friends to feast on foes: engineering terpene emission to make crop plants more attractive to herbivore enemies. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:169–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00025-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. FAOSTAT (2018) http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 27 June 2018
  9. Glas JJ, Schimmel BC, Alba JM, Escobar-Bravo R, Schuurink RC, Kant MR (2012) Plant glandular trichomes as targets for breeding or engineering of resistance to herbivores. Int J Mol Sci 13:17077–17103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Handley R, Ekbom B, Ågren J (2005) Variation in trichome density and resistance against a specialist insect herbivore in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecol Entomol 30:284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harper JL (1989) The value of a leaf. Oecologia 80:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoque S, Avila-Sakar G (2015) Trade-offs and ontogenetic changes in resistance and tolerance to insect herbivory in Arabidopsis. Int J Plant Sci 176:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kariyat RR, Smith JD, Stephenson AG, De Moraes CM, Mescher MC (2017) Non-glandular trichomes of Solanum carolinense deter feeding by Manduca sexta caterpillars and cause damage to the gut peritrophic matrix. Proc R Soc Lond B 284:20162323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kennedy GG (2003) Tomato, pests, parasitoids, and predators: tritrophic interactions involving the genus Lycopersicon. Annu Rev Entomol 48:51–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koelewijn HP (2004) Rapid change in relative growth rate between the vegetative and reproductive stage of the life cycle in Plantago coronopus. New Phytol 163:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kornelsen J, Avila-Sakar G (2015) Ontogenetic changes in defence against a generalist herbivore in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Ecol 216:847–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levin DA (1973) The role of trichomes in plant defense. Q Rev Biol 48:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li X, Garvey M, Kaplan I, Li B, Carrillo J (2018) Domestication of tomato has reduced the attraction of herbivore natural enemies to pest-damaged plants. Agric For Entomol 20:390–401.  https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McDowell ET et al (2011) Comparative functional genomic analysis of Solanum glandular trichome types. Plant Physiol 155:524–539.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.167114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKey D, Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (1979) The distribution of secondary compounds within plants. In: Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 55–133Google Scholar
  22. Milla R, Osborne CP, Turcotte MM, Violle C (2015) Plant domestication through an ecological lens. Trends Ecol Evol 30:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (1990) Applied linear statistical models: regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs, 3rd edn. Irwin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  24. Oney MA, Bingham RA (2014) Effects of simulated and natural herbivory on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. esculentum) leaf trichomes. Bios 85:192–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Owen MD, Beckie HJ, Leeson JY, Norsworthy JK, Steckel LE (2015) Integrated pest management and weed management in the United States and Canada. Pest Manag Sci 71:357–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Picanço M, Bacci L, Crespo A, Miranda M, Martins JC (2007) Effect of integrated pest management practices on tomato production and conservation of natural enemies. Agric For Entomol 9:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roy B, Stanton M, Eppley S (1999) Effects of environmental stress on leaf hair density and consequences for selection. J Evol Biol 12:1089–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simmons AT, Gurr GM (2005) Trichomes of Lycopersicon species and their hybrids: effects on pests and natural enemies. Agric For Entomol 7:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sletvold N, Huttunen P, Handley R, Kärkkäinen K, Ågren J (2010) Cost of trichome production and resistance to a specialist insect herbivore in Arabidopsis lyrata. Evol Ecol 24:1307–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stamp N (2003) Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. Q Rev Biol 78:23–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tian D, Tooker J, Peiffer M, Chung SH, Felton GW (2012) Role of trichomes in defense against herbivores: comparison of herbivore response to woolly and hairless trichome mutants in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Planta 236:1053–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Traw MB, Feeny P (2008) Glucosinolates and trichomes track tissue value in two sympatric mustards. Ecology 89:763–772.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0729.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Werker E (2000) Trichome diversity and development. Adv Bot Res 31:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilkens RT, Shea GO, Halbereich S, Stamp NE (1996) Resource availability and the trichome defenses of tomato plants. Oecologia 106:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang C, Ye Z (2013) Trichomes as models for studying plant cell differentiation. Cell Mol Life Sci 70:1937–1948CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe University of WinnipegWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations