Advertisement

Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 79–90 | Cite as

Epichloë endophytes of Poa alsodes employ alternative mechanisms for host defense: insecticidal versus deterrence

  • Tatsiana ShymanovichEmail author
  • Ashleigh M. Musso
  • Nadja B. Cech
  • Stanley H. Faeth
Original Paper
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

Some cool-season pooid grasses partner with symbiotic fungal endophytes in the Epichloë genus for defense against insect herbivores via fungal alkaloids. Poa alsodes, North American woodland grass, independently hosts two species of Epichloë that vary by produced alkaloids. E. alsodes produces insecticidal N-acetylnorloline. E. schardlii var. pennsylvanica (E. schardlii hereafter) has the gene for peramine, an insect-deterring alkaloid, production, but peramine was not detected. We tested the effects of the two endophytes on survival, feeding preference, and plant damage by the generalist herbivore, Spodoptera frugiperda. No larvae survived when feeding on plants harboring E. alsodes. In contrast, survival was only slightly reduced by plants harboring E. schardlii. However, larvae that fed on E. schardlii infected plants experienced delayed development and reduced pupal mass. Uninfected plants and plants infected with E. schardlii were damaged severely when single larvae fed upon them, whereas larvae fed negligibly on plants infected with E. alsodes. Preference did not match performance. Larvae strongly avoided feeding on E. schardlii but not E. alsodes-infected leaves where survival was zero. When E. schardlii was experimentally removed, larval leaf choices suggested that this endophyte is responsible for deterrence. High levels of N-acetylnorloline were detected from E. alsodes infected plants. Peramine was not detected in the experimental plants harboring E. schardlii, so it remains unclear what mechanisms caused avoidance and developmental delays. The two endophytes may protect their common host in different ways: E. alsodes by larval mortality and E. schardlii by deterring feeding and negative effects on development.

Keywords

Endophytic alkaloids Larval mortality Larval performance Feeding preference N-acetylnorloline 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the University of North Carolina at Greensboro Biology Department; Dr. Stanley Faeth National Science Foundation grant# DEB 0917741 for funding, Dr. Carolyn Young and Dr. Nikki Charlton from the Noble research Institute for identifying infections and alkaloid genes profiling of mother plants, Dr. Johnathan Scheerer from College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA for N-acetylnorloline standard synthesis, Anna and Anastasia Shymanovich for help with growing plants and growth estimates, Angie Larsen for help with statistics, and Daniel Foil and Dr. Daniel Todd from the Triad Mass Spectrometry Facility at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro for assistance with mass spectrometry analysis.

Author contributions

TS and SHF conceived and designed the experiments, TS performed the experiments and analyzed the data, NBC and AMM performed chemical analyses, TS and SHF wrote the manuscript; other authors provided editorial advice.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11829_2018_9635_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 KB)

References

  1. Agrawal AA (2011) Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence. Funct Ecol 25:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball OJ, Coudron TA, Taper BA, Davies E, Trently D et al (2006) Importance of host plant species, Neotyphodium endophyte isolate, and alkaloids on feeding by Spopoptera frigiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. J Econ Entomol 99:1462–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berenbaum MR (1995) The chemistry of defense: theory and practice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry D, Takach JE, Schardl CL, Charlton ND, Scott B, Young CA (2015) Disparate independent genetic events disrupt the secondary metabolism gene perA in certain symbiotic Epichloë species. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:2797–2807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowers MD (1990) Recycling plant natural products for insect defense. In: Evans DL, Schmidt JO (eds) Insect defenses: adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators. State University of New Your Press, Albany, pp 353–383Google Scholar
  6. Bultman TL et al (2009) Influence of genetic variation in the fungal endophyte of a grass on an herbivore and its parasitoid. Entomol Exp Appl 130:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlton ND, Craven KD, AfkhamiM E, Hall BA, Ghimire SR, Young CA (2014) Interspecific hybridization and bioactive alkaloid variation increases diversity in endophytic Epichloë species of Bromus laevipes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 90:276–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheplick GP, Faeth SH (2009) Ecology and evolution of the grass-endophyte symbiosis. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clay K, Cheplick GP (1989) Effect of ergot alkaloids from fungal endophyte-infected grasses on fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda). J Chem Ecol 15:169–182.  https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf02027781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clay K, Schardl C (2002) Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. Am Nat 160:S99–S127.  https://doi.org/10.1086/342161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford KM, Land JM, Rudgers JA (2010) Fungal endophytes of native grasses decrease insect herbivore preference and performance. Oecologia 164:431–444.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1685-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dmitriew C, Rowe L (2011) The effects of larval nutrition on reproductive performance in a food-limited adult environment. PLoS ONE 6:e17399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faeth SH, Saari S (2012) Fungal grass endophytes and arthropod communities: lessons from plant defence theory and multitrophic interactions. Fungal Ecol 5:364–371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2011.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghimire SR, Rudgers JA, Charlton ND, Young C, Craven KD (2011) Prevalence of an intraspecific neotyphodium hybrid in natural populations of stout wood reed (Cinna arundinacea) from eastern North America. Mycologia 103:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardy TN, Clay K, Hammond AM (1985) Fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a laboratory bioassay and larval preference study for the fungal endophyte of perennial ryegrass. J Econ Entomol 78:571–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harley KLS, Thorsteinson AJ (1967) The influence of plant chemicals on the feeding behavior, development, and survival of the two-striped grasshopper, Melanopus bivittatus (Say), Acrididae: Orthoptera. Can J Zool 45:305–319.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z67-043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iannone LJ, Novas MV, Young CA, DeBattista JP, Schard lCL (2012) Endophytes of native grasses from South America: biodiversity and ecology. Fungal Ecol 5:357–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2011.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jarmusch AK et al (2015) Comparison of electrospray ionization and atmospheric pressure photoionization liquid chromatography mass spectrometry methods for analysis of ergot alkaloids from endophyte-infected sleepygrass (Achnatherum robustum). J Pharm Biomed Anal 117:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jia T, Shymanovich T, Gao Y-B, Faeth SH (2015) Plant population and genotype effects override the effects of Epichloë endophyte species on growth and drought stress response of Achnatherum robustum plants in two natural grass populations. J Plant Ecol 8:633–641Google Scholar
  20. Leuchtmann A, Bacon CW, Schardl CL, White JF, Tadych M (2014) Nomenclatural realignment of Neotyphodium species with genus Epichloe. Mycologia 106:202–215.  https://doi.org/10.3852/106.2.202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. López-Edwards M, Hernández-Mendoza JL, Pescador-Rubio A, Molina-Ochoa J, Lezama-Gutiérrez R, Hamm J, Wiseman B (1999) Biological differences between five populations of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) collected from corn in Mexico. Florida Entomol 58:254–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mello MO, Silva-Filho MC (2002) Plant-insect interactions: an evolutionary arms race between two distinct defense mechanisms. Braz J Plant Physiol 14:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Michaud J (2003) Toxicity of fruit fly baits to beneficial insects in citrus. J Insect Sci 3:8Google Scholar
  24. Oberhofer M, Leuchtmann A (2012) Genetic diversity in epichloid endophytes of Hordelymus europaeus suggests repeated host jumps and interspecific hybridizations. Mol Ecol 21:2713–2726.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05459.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Panaccione DG, Beaulieu WT, Cook D (2014) Bioactive alkaloids in vertically transmitted fungal endophytes. Funct Ecol 28:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pashley DP (1988) The current status of fall armyworm host strain. Florida Entomol 71:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Popay A, Tapper B, Podmore C (2009) Endophyte-infected meadow fescue and loline alkaloids affect Argentine stem weevil larvae. NZ Plant Prot 62:19–27Google Scholar
  28. Potter DA, Stokes JT, Redmond CT, Schardl CL, Panaccione DG (2008) Contribution of ergot alkaloids to suppression of a grass-feeding caterpillar assessed with gene knockout endophytes in perennial ryegrass. Entomol Exp Appl 126:138–147.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00650.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URLhttp://www.R-project.org
  30. Saari S, Faeth SH (2012) Hybridization of Neotyphodium endophytes enhances competitive ability of the host grass. New Phytol 195:231–236.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04140.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saikkonen K, Wali P, Helander M, Faeth SH (2004) Evolution of endophyte-plant symbioses. Trends Plant Sci 9:275–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saikkonen K, Wäli PR, Helander M (2010) Genetic compatibility determines endophyte-grass combinations. PLoS ONE 5(6):e11395.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone0011395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schardl CL (2010) The epichloae, symbionts of the grass subfamily pooideae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 97:646–665.  https://doi.org/10.3417/2009144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schardl CL, Chen F (2001) Plant defences against herbivore attack. Wiley, Chichester.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0001324.pub2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schardl CL, Young CA, Faulkner JR, Florea S, Pan J (2012) Chemotypic diversity of epichloae, fungal symbionts of grasses. Fungal Ecol 5:331–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2011.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schardl CL, Florea S, Pan J, Nagabhyru P, Bec S, Calie PJ (2013a) The epichloae: alkaloid diversity and roles in symbiosis with grasses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:480–488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schardl CL et al (2013b) Currencies of mutualisms: sources of alkaloid genes in vertically transmitted epichloae. Toxins 5:1064–1088.  https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins5061064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shymanovich T, Faeth SH (2018) Anti-insect defenses of Achnatherum robustum (sleepygrass) provided by two Epichloë endophyte species. Entomol Exp Appl 166(6):474–482.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shymanovich T et al (2015) Alkaloid variation among epichloid endophytes of sleepygrass (Achnatherum robustum) and consequences for resistance to insect herbivores. J Chem Ecol 41:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shymanovich T, Charlton ND, Musso AM, Scheerer J, Cech NB, Faeth SH, Young CA (2017) Interspecific and intraspecific hybrid Epichloë species symbiotic with the North American native grass Poa alsodes. Mycologia 109(3):459–474.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2017.1340779 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Siegel MR et al (1990) Fungal endophyte-infected grasses—alkaloid accumulation and aphid response. J Chem Ecol 16:3301–3315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf00982100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sparks AN (1979) A review of the biology of the fall armyworm. Florida Entomol 62:82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sullivan TJ, Faeth SH (2008) Local adaptation in Festuca arizonica infected by hybrid and nonhybrid Neotyphodium endophytes. Microb Ecol 55:697–704.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9312-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vélez A, Spence rT, Alves A, Crespo A, Siegfried B (2014) Fitness costs of Cry1F resistance in fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. J Appl Entomol 138:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilkinson HH, Siegel MR, Blankenship JD, Mallory AC, Bush LP, Schardl CL (2000) Contribution of fungal loline alkaloids to protection from aphids in a grass-endophyte mutualism. Mol Plant Microbe In 13:1027–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of North Carolina GreensboroGreensboroUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryUniversity of North Carolina GreensboroGreensboroUSA

Personalised recommendations