Arthropod-Plant Interactions

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 57–70 | Cite as

Differential life-history responses in Neolema abbreviata, a biological control agent for Tradescantia fluminensis under water and nitrogen gradients

  • Abongile Mbande
  • Michelle Tedder
  • Frank ChidawanyikaEmail author
Original Paper


Due to their sessile nature, plants inexorably endure both transient and chronic environmental stressors with subsequent impact on their interactions with other trophic groups. Water and nitrogen variability are key abiotic factors mediating the interaction between plants and insect herbivores. For insects used in classical biological control of plants, such factors may determine extent of herbivory, population dynamics and ultimately field establishment and persistence. We conducted a full factorial experiment to determine the impact of water and fertiliser variability on the performance of Neolema abbreviata (Lacordaire) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and its host plant Tradescantia fluminensis Vell (Commelinaceae). Water and fertiliser variability strongly influenced T. fluminensis biomass accumulation and foliar nitrogen content. These changes in host plant quality resulted in preferential oviposition selection by the beetles with optimally irrigated plants that received moderate fertilizer being most favoured. Larval performance, in terms of weight gain and time to pupation, was highest in this treatment providing support for the preference–performance hypothesis. There were similarities in feeding performance and subsequent performance among plant treatments between larvae and adults suggesting uniform nutritional quality requirements between the life-stages. Overall, our study reveals differential effects of paired abiotic stressors and performance among herbivorous insects with both juvenile and adult feeding life-stages. The study, therefore, calls for multi-trait and factor evaluation to understand the impact of plant quality on insect life history traits. Our findings also have direct implications on mass-rearing protocols of N. abbreviata and its potential field performance.


Biocontrol Bottom-up effects Developmental plasticity Host selection Insect herbivory Preference–performance 



We appreciate project funding support from the Department of Environmental Affairs, South Africa, Natural Resources Management Program (DEA-NRMP). AM received student funding through the Department of Science and Technology Professional Development Program (DST-PDP). Technical assistance from Samora Mqolombeni, Nompilo Mhlongo, Khutso Mohobedu, Mpho Nzeru and Milly Gareeb. We are also very grateful to Casper Nyamukondiwa for comments that helped to improve the manuscript.


  1. Anderson P, Anton S (2014) Experience-based modulation of behavioral responses to plant volatiles and other sensor cues in insect herbivores. Plant Cell Environ 37:1826–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauerfeind SS, Fischer K (2005) Effects of food stress and density in different life stages on reproduction in a butterfly. Oikos 111:514–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauerfeind SS, Fischer K (2013) Testing the plant stress hypothesis: stressed plants offer better food to an insect herbivore. Entomol Exp Appl 149:148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boggs CL (2009) Understanding insect life histories and senescence through a resource allocation lens. Funct Ecol 23:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bownes A, Hill MP, Byrne MJ (2013a) Nutrient-mediated effects on Cornops aquaticum Brüner (Orthoptera: Acrididae), a potential biological control agent of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms (Pontederiaceae). Biol Control 67:548–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bownes A, Hill MP, Byrne MJ (2013b) The role of nutrients in the responses of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae) to herbivory by a grasshopper Cornops aquaticum Brüner (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Biol Control 67:555–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braby MF, Jones RE (1995) Reproductive patterns and resource allocation in tropical butterflies: influence of adult diet and seasonal phenotype on fecundity, longevity and egg size. Oikos 72:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burns JH (2004) A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Divers Distrib 10:387–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cator LJ, Zanti Z (2016) Size, sounds and sex: interactions between body size and harmonic convergence signals determine mating success in Aedes aegypti. Parasit Vectors 9:622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Center TD, Dray FA (2010) Bottom-up control of water hyacinth weevil populations: do the plants regulate the insects? J Appl Ecol 47:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osório ML, Carvalho I, Faria T, Pinheiro C (2002) How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot 89:907–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen KW, Chen Y (2016) Slow-growth high-mortality: a meta-analysis for insects. Insect Sci 25:337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen Y, Ruberson JR, Olson D (2008) Nitrogen fertilization rate affects feeding, larval performance, and oviposition preference of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua, on cotton. Entomol Exp Appl 126:244–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen Y, Olson DM, Ruberson JR (2010) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on tritrophic interactions. Arthropod Plant Interact 4:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chidawanyika F, Midega A, Bruce TJ, Duncan F, Pickett JA, Khan ZR (2014) Oviposition acceptance and larval development of Chilo partellus stem borers in drought-stressed wild and cultivated grasses of East Africa. Entomol Exp Appl 151:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cornelissen T, Stiling P (2006) Does low nutritional quality act as a plant defence? An experimental test of the slow-growth, high-mortality hypothesis. Ecol Entomol 31:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowie BW, Byrne MJ, Witkowski ET, Venter N (2016) Exacerbation of photosynthetic damage through increased heat–light stress resulting from Gargaphia decoris sap-feeding. Biol Control 94:82–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. D’mitriew C, Rowe L (2011) The effects of larval nutrition on reproductive performance in a food-limited adult environment. PLoS ONE 6:e17399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis JM, Nufio CR, Papaj DR (2011) Resource quality or competition: why increase resource acceptance in the presence of conspecifics? Behav Ecol 22:730–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. English-Loeb G, Stout MJ, Duffey SS (1997) Drought stress in tomatoes: changes in plant chemistry and potential nonlinear consequences for insect herbivores. Oikos 79:456–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fischer K, Fiedler K (2000) Response of the copper butterfly Lycaena tityrus to increased leaf nitrogen in natural food plants: evidence against the nitrogen limitation hypothesis. Oecologia 124:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fowler SV, Barreto R, Dodd S, Macedo DM, Paynter Q, Pedrosa-Macedo JH, Pereira OL, Peterson P, Smith L, Waipara N, Winks CJ (2013) Tradescantia fluminensis, an exotic weed affecting native forest regeneration in New Zealand: Ecological surveys, safety tests and releases of four biocontrol agents from Brazil. Biol Control 64:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franzke A, Reinhold K (2011) Stressing food plants by altering water availability affects grasshopper performance. Ecosphere 2:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fréchette B, Coderre D, Lucas É (2006) Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) females do not avoid ovipositing in the presence of conspecific eggs. Biol Control 3:354–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geister TL, Lorenz MW, Hoffmann KH, Fischer K (2008) Adult nutrition and butterfly fitness: effects of diet quality on reproductive output, egg composition, and egg hatching success. Front Zool 5:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goyret J, Raguso RA (2006) The role of mechanosensory input in flower handling efficiency and learning by Manduca sexta. J Exp Biol 209:1585–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goyret J, Markwell PM, Raguso RA (2008) Context and scale-dependent effects of floral CO2 on nectar foraging by Manduca sexta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:4565–4570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guerrieri E, Digilio MC (2008) Aphid-plant interactions: a review. J Plant Interact 3:223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gutbrodt B, Mody K, Dorn S (2011) Drought changes plant chemistry and causes contrasting responses in lepidopteran herbivores. Oikos 120:1732–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gutbrodt B, Dorn S, Mody K (2012) Drought stress affects constitutive but not induced herbivore resistance in apple plants. Arthropod Plant Interact 6:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hahn PG, Maron JL (2018) Plant water stress and previous herbivore damage affect insect performance. Ecol Entomol 43:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Han P, Lavoir AV, Le Bot J, Amiens-Desneux E, Desneux N (2014) Nitrogen and water availability to tomato plants triggers bottom-up effects on the leaf miner Tuta absoluta. Sci Rep 4:4455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Han P, Desneux N, Amiens-Desneux E, Le Bot J, Bearez P, Lavoir AV (2016) Does plant cultivar difference modify the bottom-up effects of resource limitation on plant-insect herbivore interactions? J Chem Ecol 42:1293–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. He M, Dijkstra FA (2014) Drought effect on plant nitrogen and phosphorus: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 204:924–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heard TA, Winterton SL (2000) Interactions between nutrient status and weevil herbivory in the biological control of water hyacinth. J Appl Ecol 37:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Helmberger MS, Craig TP, Itami JK (2016) Effects of drought stress on oviposition preference and offspring performance of the lace bug Corythucha marmorata on its goldenrod host, Solidago altissima. Entomol Exp Appl 160:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hopwood PE, Moore AJ, Royle NJ (2014) Effects of resource variation during early life and adult social environment on contest outcomes in burying beetles: a context-dependent silver spoon strategy? Proc R Soc Lond B 281:20133102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huberty AF, Denno RF (2004) Plant water stress and its consequences for herbivorous insects: a new synthesis. Ecology 85:1383–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jithesh MN, Prashanth SR, Sivaprakash KR, Parida AK (2006) Antioxidative response mechanisms in halophytes: their role in stress defence. J Genet 85:237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kohandani F, Goff GJ, Hance T (2017) Does insect mother know under what conditions it will make their offspring live? Insect Sci 24:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. König MAE, Wiklund C, Ehrlén J (2016) Butterfly oviposition preference is not related to larval performance on a polyploid herb. Ecol Evol 6:2781–2789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Larbat R, Le Bot J, Bourgaud F, Robin C, Adamowicz S (2012a) Organ-specific responses of tomato growth and phenolic metabolism to nitrate limitation. Plant Biol 14:760–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larbat R, Olsen KM, Slimestad R, Løvdal T, Bénard C, Verheul M, Bourgaud F, Robin C, Lillo C (2012b) Influence of repeated short-term nitrogen limitations on leaf phenolics metabolism in tomato. Phytochemistry 77:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Larbat R, Adamowicz S, Robin C, Han P, Desneux N, Lebot J (2016) Interrelated responses of tomato plants and the leaf miner Tuta absoluta to nitrogen supply. Plant Biol 18:495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Le Bot J, Bénard C, Robin C, Bourgaud F, Adamowicz S (2009) The “trade-off” between synthesis of primary and secondary compounds in young tomato leaves is altered by nitrate nutrition: experimental evidence and model consistency. J Exp Bot 60:4301–4314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee KP (2017) Genetic variation in compensatory feeding for dietary dilution in a generalist caterpillar. Sci Rep 7:7461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lindroth RL, Barman MA, Weisbrod AV (1991) Nutrient deficiencies and the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. Effects on larval performance and detoxification enzyme activities. J Insect Physiol 3:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Martin-StPaul N, Delzon S, Cochard H (2017) Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure. Ecology Lett. Google Scholar
  50. Martínez G, González A, Dicke M (2018) Effect of the eucalypt lerp psyllid on adult feeding, oviposition-site selection, and offspring performance of the bronze bug. Entomol Exp et Appl 166(5):395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. May CM, Doroszuk A, Zwaan BJ (2015) The effect of developmental nutrition on life span and fecundity depends on the adult reproductive environment in Drosophila melanogaster. Ecol Evol 5:1156–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mody K, Eichenberger D, Dorn S (2009) Stress magnitude matters: different intensities of pulsed water stress produce non-monotonic resistance responses of host plants to insect herbivores. Ecol Entomol 34:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Monaghan P (2008) Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 363:1635–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moreau J, Benrey B, Thiéry D (2006) Assessing larval food quality for phytophagous insects: are the facts as simple as they appear? Funct Ecol 20:592–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Neilsen D, Hogue EJ, Neilsen GH, Paromchuk P (1995) Using SPAD 502 values to assess the nitrogen status of apple trees. HortScience 30:508–512Google Scholar
  56. Ômura H, Honda K, Asaoka K, Inoue TA (2008) Tolerance to fermentation products in sugar reception: gustatory adaptation of adult butterfly proboscis for feeding on rotting foods. J Comp Physiol A 194(6):545–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Olson DM, Cortesero AM, Rains G, Potter T, Lewis WJ (2009) Nitrogen and water affect direct and indirect plant systemic induced defense in cotton. Biol Control 49:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Petersen C, Woods HA, Kingsolver JG (2000) Stage-specific effects of temperature and dietary protein on growth and survival of Manduca sexta caterpillars. Physiol Entomol 25:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pezzola E, Mancuso S, Karban R (2017) Precipitation affects plant communication and defense. Ecology 98(6):1693–1699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pineda A, Pangesti N, Sole R, van Dam NM, van Loon JJ, Dicke M (2016) Negative impact of drought stress on a generalist leaf chewer and a phloem feeder is associated with, but not explained by an increase in herbivore-induced indole glucosinolates. Environ Exp Bot 123:88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Price PW (1991) The plant vigour hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62:244–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Renwick JAA, Chew FS (1994) Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 39:377–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rousselin A, Sauge MH, Jordan MO, Vercambre G, Lescourret F, Bevacqua D (2016) Nitrogen and water supplies affect peach tree–green peach aphid interactions: the key role played by vegetative growth. Agric For Entomol 18:367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Santos JC, Silveira FA, Fernandes GW (2008) Long term oviposition preference and larval performance of Schizomyia macrocapillata (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on larger shoots of its host plant Bauhinia brevipes (Fabaceae). Evol Ecol 22:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sardans J, Peñuelas J (2012) The role of plants in the effects of global change on nutrient availability and stoichiometry in the plant-soil system. Plant Physiol 160:1741–1761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schäpers A, Carlsson MA, Gamberale-Stille G, Janz N (2015) The role of olfactory cues for the search behavior of a specialist and generalist butterfly. J Insect Behav 28:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scharf I, Braf H, Ifrach N, Rosenstein S, Subach A (2015) The effects of temperature and diet during development, adulthood, and mating on reproduction in the red flour beetle. PLoS ONE 10:e0136924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scheirs J, De Bruyn L (2002) Integrating optimal foraging and optimal oviposition theory in plant–insect research. Oikos 96:187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sconiers WB, Eubanks MD (2017) Not all droughts are created equal? The effects of stress severity on insect herbivore abundance. Arthropod Plant Interact 11:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Standish RJ (2004) Impact of an invasive clonal herb on epigaeic invertebrates in forest remnants in New Zealand. Biol Conserv 116:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Standish RJ, Robertson AW, Williams PA (2001) The impact of an invasive weed Tradescantia fluminensis on native forest regeneration. J Appl Ecol 38:1253–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tariq M, Wright DJ, Rossiter JT, Staley JT (2012) Aphids in a changing world: testing the plant stress, plant vigour and pulsed stress hypotheses. Agric For Entomol 14:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tariq M, Wright DJ, Bruce TJ, Staley JT (2013) Drought and root herbivory interact to alter the response of above-ground parasitoids to aphid infested plants and associated plant volatile signals. PLoS ONE 8(7):e69013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thompson JN, Pellmyr O (1991) Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 36:65–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Uddling J, Gelang-Alfredsson J, Piikki K, Pleijel H (2007) Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings. Photosynth Res 91:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Valim JOS, Teixeira NC, Santos NA, Oliveira MGA, Campos WG (2016) Drought-induced acclimatization of a fast-growing plant decreases insect performance in leaf-chewing and sap-sucking guilds. Arthropod Plant Interact 10:351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. White TCR (1969) An index to measure weather-induced stress of trees associated with outbreaks of psyllids in Australia. Ecology 50:905–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. White TCR (1993) The inadequate environment: nitrogen and the abundance of animals. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. White TCR (2009) Plant vigour versus plant stress: a false dichotomy. Oikos 118:807–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. White TCR (2015) Senescence-feeders: a new trophic sub-guild of insect herbivores. J Appl Entomol 139:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Williams I (1999) Slow-growth, high-mortality–a general hypothesis, or is it? Ecol Entomol 24:490–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Weeds Division, Plant Protection Research InstituteAgricultural Research CouncilHiltonSouth Africa
  2. 2.School of Life SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalPietermaritzburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Zoology and EntomologyUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations