Advertisement

Plant Biotechnology Reports

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 111–120 | Cite as

Physiological responses of yellow-horn seedlings to high temperatures under drought condition

  • Hua Jin
  • Jixiang Zou
  • Linlin Li
  • Xinlei Bai
  • Tong Zhu
  • Junbao Li
  • Bingcheng Xu
  • Zhi WangEmail author
Original Article
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Drought and hot stresses are the primary limiting factors for the growth and seed production of yellow-horn (Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge), especially in Xinjiang Province of China. A better understanding of its physiological and biochemical characteristics under drought–hot stress is requisite for its efficient cultivation in the arid and semi-arid areas. In this study, the physiological and biochemical responses of 3-month-old yellow-horn seedlings were evaluated after 7 days of treatments of five temperatures (25 °C/20 °C, 30 °C/25 °C, 35 °C/25 °C, 40 °C/25 °C and 45 °C/25 °C) under two watering conditions [adequate water supply (HW): 80 ± 5% FC (field capacity); low water supply (LW): 40 ± 5% FC] by a pot experiment. The increased temperature (above to 35 °C) markedly aggravated the damage on biomass accumulation and membrane integrity of yellow-horn seedlings under the LW. The accumulation of soluble sugars and proteins exhibited a growing trend as the temperature increased from 25 to 40 °C, which declined when the temperature was higher than 40 °C except for the soluble protein accumulation under HW. In addition, captured responsive characteristics of the gas-exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence have indicated that the combinations of high temperature (above to 35 °C) and LW induced significant decrease in photosynthetic activities of yellow-horn seedlings. All these results showed that the hot stress significantly aggravated the drought damage on yellow-horn plant growth, especially when the temperature increased above 35 °C under drought stress.

Keywords

Drought–hot stress Membrane stability Gas-exchange parameters Chlorophyll fluorescence Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Science Technology Yuanjiang Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2016E02045), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DC201501070202), the Shaanxi Provincial Key R&D Program (2019TSLNY03-01) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700335).

Author contributions

HJ and ZW: conceived and designed the experiments. JZ, LL and LB: performed the experiments. JZ, TZ and BX: analyzed the data. HJ, JL and ZW: contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. HJ and ZW: wrote the paper.

References

  1. Ao Y, Duan J, Yu HY, Jiang CY, Ma L (2012) Research progress on Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge. J China Agric Univ 17(6):197–203Google Scholar
  2. Avramova V, Nagel KA, AbdElgawad H, Bustos D, DuPlessis M, Fiorani F, Beemster GT (2016) Screening for drought tolerance of maize hybrids by multi-scale analysis of root and shoot traits at the seedling stage. J Exp Bot 67(8):2453–2466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai Y, Xu H, Ling H (2014) Drought–flood variation and its correlation with runoff in three headstreams of Tarim River, Xinjiang, China. Environ Earth Sci 71(3):1297–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bi Q, Mao JF, Guan W (2014) Efficiently developing a large set of polymorphic EST-SSR markers for Xanthoceras sorbifolium by mining raw reads from high-throughput sequencing. Conserv Genet Resour 7(2):423–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castillo RJ, Cervera JC, Navarro-Alberto J (2016) Drought and extreme temperature tolerance for Tillandsia dasyliriifolia, an epiphytic bromeliad from the northern coastal dune scrubland in Yucatan, Mexico. Bot Sci 94(1):121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Celikkol Akcay U, Ercan O, Kavas M, Yildiz L, Yilmaz HC, Oktem A, Yucel M (2010) Drought-induced oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L) seedlings. Plant Growth Regul 61(1):21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen T, Yang Q, Gruber M, Kang J, Sun Y, Ding W, Zhang T, Zhang X (2012) Expression of an alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ethylene response factor gene MsERF8 in tobacco plants enhances resistance to salinity. Mol Biol Rep 39:6067–6075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dermody O, Weltzin JF, Engel EC, Allen P, Norby RJ (2007) How do elevated [CO2], warming, and reduced precipitation interact to affect soil moisture and LAI in an old field ecosystem. Plant Soil 301:255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fu L, Ding Z, Han B, Hu W, Li Y, Zhang J (2016) Physiological investigation and transcriptome analysis of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced dehydration stress in cassava. Int J Mol Sci 17:283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo Y, Zhang W, He J, Zhou J, Yu H (2012) Effects of water stress and seed mass on germination and antioxidative enzymes of Xanthoceras sorbifolia. Afr J Biotech 11(18):4187–4195Google Scholar
  11. Jiang P, Wang XL, Sun XN, Niu PX, Du ZM (2008) Effects of high temperature stress on antioxidant enzymes in Xanthoceras sorbifolia. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis 30(2):220–225Google Scholar
  12. Krishna Surendar K, Durga Devi D, Ravi I, Jeyakumarn P, Velayudham K (2013) Water stress affects plant relative water content, soluble protein, total chlorophyll content and yield of ratoon banana. Int J Horticult 3(17):96–103Google Scholar
  13. Lambrev PH, Miloslavina Y, Jahns P, Holzwarth AR (2012) On the relationship between non-photochemical quenching and photoprotection of photosystem II. BBA-Bioenerget 1817:760–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li HS (2006) Principles and techniques of plant physiology and biochemistry experiment. Higher Education Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  15. Li KR, Feng CH (2011) Effects of brassinolide on drought resistance of Xanthoceras sorbifolia seedlings under water stress. Acta Physiol Plant 33:1293–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lobell DB, Asner GP (2003) Climate and management contributions to recent trends in US agricultural yields. Science 299:1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mamtimin B, Et-Tantawi AMM, Schaefer D, Meixner FX, Domroes M (2011) Recent trends of temperature change under hot and cold desert climates: comparing the Sahara (Libya) and Central Asia (Xinjiang, China). J Arid Environ 75(11):1105–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Medrano H, Escalona JM, Bota J, Gulías J, Flexas J (2002) Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann Bot 89:895–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mittler R (2006) Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci 11(1):15–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nahar K, Hasanuzzaman M, Alam MM, Rahman A, Mahmud JA, Suzuki T, Fujita M (2016) Insights into spermine-induced combined high temperature and drought tolerance in mung bean: osmoregulation and roles of antioxidant and glyoxalase system. Protoplasma 254(1):445–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rong W, Sun Z, Li Q, Liu R, Zhang T, Wang T, Yang W, Li Z, Bi K (2016) Characterization and simultaneous quantification of seven triterpenoid saponins in different parts of Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge by HPLC-ESI-TOF. Anal Methods 8:2176–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roy J, Picon-Cochard C, Augusti A, Benot ML, Thiery L, Darsonville O, Landais D, Piel C, Defossez M, Devidal S, Escape C, Ravel O, Fromin N, Volaire F, Milcu A, Bahn M, Soussana JF (2016) Elevated CO2 maintains grassland net carbon uptake under a future heat and drought extreme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(22):6224–6229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruban AV, Murchie EH (2012) Assessing the photoprotective effectiveness of non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching: a new approach. BBA-Bioenerget 1817:977–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sami F, Yusuf M, Faizan M, Faraz A, Hayat S (2016) Role of sugars under abiotic stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 109:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sekmen AH, Turkan I, Takio S (2007) Differential responses of antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation to salt stress in salt-tolerant Plantagomaritima and salt-sensitive Plantago media. Physiologia Plantarumn 131:399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wahid A, Close TJ (2007) Expression of dehydrins under heat stress and their relationship with water relations of sugarcane leaves. Biol Plant 51:104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad M (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 61(3):199–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang WB, Kim YH, Lee HS, Kim KY, Deng XP, Kwak S-S (2009) Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiol Biochem 47:570–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang Z, Ke Q, Kim MD, Kim SH, Ji CY, Jeong JC, Lee HS, Park WS, Ahn MJ, Li H, Xu B, Deng X, Lee SH, Lim YP, Kwak S-S (2015) Transgenic alfalfa plants expressing the sweetpotato Orange gene exhibit enhanced abiotic stress tolerance. PLoS ONE 10(5):e0126050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wise RR, Olson AJ, Schrader SM, Sharkey TD (2004) Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant Cell Environ 27:717–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu J, Ma M, Zhang G, Wei D, Liu S (2014) Photosynthetic physiological response of Xanthoceras sorbifolia under drought stress. Agric Res Arid Areas 32(5):55–60Google Scholar
  32. Xiao W, Wang Y, Zhang P, Li N, Jiang S, Wang JH, Huang J, Li X (2013) Bioactive barrigenol type triterpenoids from the leaves of Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge. Eur J Med Chem 60:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu DX (2008) Research and practice of Yellow-horn. Inner Mongolia Science and Technology Press, ChiFeng, pp 11–12Google Scholar
  34. Xu DQ, Shen YK (2002) Photosynthetic efficiency and crop yield. In: PESSARAKLIM (ed) Handbook of plant and crop stress. Marcel Dekker, New York pp 821–834.Google Scholar
  35. Xu WZ, Deng XP, Xu BC, Gao ZJ, Ding WL (2014) Photosynthetic activity and efficiency of Bothriochloa ischaemum and Lespedeza davurica in mixtures across growth periods under water stress. Acta Physiol Plant 36:1033–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang A, Akhtar SS, Amjad M, Iqbal S, Jacobsen SE (2016) Growth and physiological responses of Quinoa to drought and temperature stress. J Agron Crop Sci 202(6):445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yao ZY, Qi JH, Yin LM (2013) Biodiesel production from Xanthoceras sorbifolia in China: opportunities and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 24:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang H, Zhou Q (2013) Tyrosinase inhibitory effects and antioxidative activities of saponins from Xanthoceras sorbifolia Nutshell. PLoS ONE 8(8):e70090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang S, Zu YG, Fu YJ, Luo M, Liu W, Li J, Efferth T (2010) Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of seed oil from yellow horn (Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge.) and its anti-oxidant activity. Biores Technol 101:2537–2544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang G, Wei D, Wu J, Liu S (2014) Effects of drought stress on physiological characteristics of Xanthoceras sorbifolia from different provenances and analysis on drought-resistance in seedling stage. J Northwest Forestry Univ 29(1):1–7Google Scholar
  41. Zhao J, Hartmann H, Trumbore S, Ziegler W, Zhang Y (2013) High temperature causes negative whole-plant carbon balance under mild drought. New Phytol 200(2):330–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Plant Biotechnology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environment and ResourcesDalian Minzu UniversityDalianPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming On the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water ConservationNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Shaanxi Institute of Desertification ControlYulinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations