Advertisement

Sensor location in concrete slabs with various layout of opening using modified ‘FEMS-COMAC’ approach

Abstract

Two-way concrete slabs are widely used around the world for the construction of many types of infrastructures and common buildings. The optimal sensor placement (OSP) in slabs with various opening positions is the most important issue in structural health monitoring (SHM) to increase reliability. In this study, a novel approach of OSP was evaluated to obtain the number and placement of sensors using examination of the closed loop performance. The nonlinear finite element (NFE) was used to discretize the mechanism behavior of slab. Multi-Objective Optimization based on the coordinate modal assurance criterion (COMAC) and cost considerations was considered in the optimization processes. All of the analysis, discretization and optimization process was designed and developed as a novel approach in Matlab by the author under the name ‘FEMS-COMAC’ (FEM analysis of slab with COMAC). The points in the finite element method (FEM) mesh were classified as line by line information along the slab. The OSP in each line was optimized according to the objective function. The slabs with various width, thickness, aspect ratio and opening position were selected as case studies. The results of the OSP using the COMAC algorithm around the slab openings were compared with the novel ‘FEMS-COMAC’ method. The statistical analysis according Mann-Whitney criteria shows that there were significant differences between them in some of the case studies (mean P-value=0.54).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abbreviations

B :

Length of the bay of slab (longer side)

C eff :

Effective damping coefficient eff

COMAC:

Coordinate modal assurance criterion

D :

The slab flexural rigidity

DOF:

Degree of freedom

E :

Modulus of elasticity for plane stress analysis

EI :

Effective independence

FEM:

Finite element method

FEMS-COMAC:

FEM analysis of slab with COMAC

EVP:

Eigenvalue vector product

f :

Natural frequency

FF:

Natural frequency of freely

f num :

Numerical natural frequency num

f anal :

Analytical natural frequency anal

FBG:

Fiber bragg grating

GA:

Genetic algorithm

KE:

Kinetic energy

G :

Shear modulus

M :

Moment

MAC:

Modal assurance criterion

MSSP:

Mode shape summation plot

MA:

Modal analysis

MAE:

Mean absolute error

N :

Number of observations

NFE:

Nonlinear finite element

NTA:

Nonlinear time history analysis

OSP:

Optimal sensor placement

Q x :

Shearing forces parallel to z axis

Q y :

Shearing forces perpendicular to x and y axes y

R 2 :

Correlation coefficient

RC:

Reinforced concrete

RMSE:

Root mean square error

SHM:

Structural health monitoring

SS:

Simply supported

SON1:

Slab with opening No. 1

SON2:

Slab with opening No. 2

SON3:

Slab with opening No. 3

SON4:

Slab with opening No. 4

SON5:

Slab with opening No. 5

SWO:

Slab without opening

u :

Displacements in x direction

v :

Displacements in y direction

w :

Displacements in z direction

W :

length of the span of slab (smaller side)

α :

Numerical correction factor

γ :

Shear strain

γ max :

Maximum shear strain max

ε :

Strain

ζ :

damping ratio

θ :

Rotation

ρ :

Density

λ :

Dimensionless natural frequency factor

μ :

Mass density per unit area of slab

υ :

Poisson’s ratio of the concrete

σ :

Stress

φ i :

Eigenvector of mode i, comprising only the measured degrees of freedom

φ j :

Corresponding experimental eigenvector of mode j

φ T :

Transpose of φ

χ :

Curvature along directions

References

  1. ACI Committee 318 (2014), Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-2014) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, 348.

  2. Ahmed M and Mohammad F (2014), “Theoretical Modal Analysis of Freely and Simply Supported RC Slabs,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering, 8: 2064–2068.

  3. Aikaterini S, Genikomsou M and Anna P (2017), “3D Finite Element Investigation of the Compressive Membrane Action Effect in Reinforced Concrete Flat Slabs,” Engineering Structures, 136: 233–244.

  4. Allemang R (2003), “The Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC): Twenty Years of Use and Abuse,” Structural Dynamics Research Laboratory Mechanical, Sound and Vibration, 37: 14–23.

  5. Bompa DV and Elghazouli AY (2016), “Structural Performance of RC Flat Slabs Connected to Steel Columns with Shear Heads,” Journal of Engineering Structures, 117: 161–183.

  6. Cardoso R, Cury A and Barbosa F (2017), “A Robust Methodology for Modal Parameters Estimation Applied to SHM,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 95: 24–41.

  7. Chen Y, Xuepan Z, Xiaoqi H, ZhengAi C, Xinghua Z and Xinbin H (2017), “Optimal Sensor Placement for Deployable Antenna Module Health Monitoring in SSPS Using Genetic Algorithm,” Acta Astronautica, 140: 213–224.

  8. Chiaia B, Kumpyak O, Placidi L and Maksimov V (2015), “Experimental Analysis and Modeling of Two-Way Reinforced Concrete Slabs over Different Kinds of Yielding Supports under Short-Term Dynamic Loading,” Journal of Engineering Structures, 96: 88–99.

  9. Fernandes H. Lúcio V and Ramos A (2017), “Strengthening of RC Slabs with Reinforced Concrete Overlay on the Tensile Face,” Journal of Engineering Structures, 132: 540–550.

  10. Firoozbakht M, Vosoughifar H and Ghari Ghoran A (2019), “Coverage Intensity of Optimal Sensors for Common, Isolated and Integrated Steel Structures Using Novel Approach of FEM-MAC-TTFD,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 15(8): 1–17.

  11. Hernández-Montes E, Carbonell-Márquez Luisa JF and Gil-Martín M (2014), “Limits to the Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Shells and Slabs,” Engineering Structures, 61(1): 184–194.

  12. Herraiz B and Vogel T (2016), “Novel Design Approach for the Analysis of Laterally Unrestrained Reinforced Concrete Slabs Considering Membrane Action,” Journal of Engineering Structures, 123: 313–329.

  13. Hu RP, Xu YL and Zhan S (2018), “Multi-Type Sensor Placement and Response Reconstruction for Building Structures: Experimental Investigations,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17(1): 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0423-3.

  14. Ibrahim A, Salim H and Shehab El-Din H (2011), “Moment Coefficients for Design of Waffle Slabs with and without Openings,” Journal of Engineering Structures, 33: 2644–2652.

  15. Khajehdehi R and Panahshahi N (2016), “Effect of Openings on In-Plane Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Floor Slabs,” Journal of Building Engineering, 7: 1–11.

  16. Li J, Wu CH, Hao H, Sul Y and Li Z (2017), “A Study of Concrete Slabs with Steel Wire Mesh Reinforcement under Close-In Explosive Loads,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 110: 242–254.

  17. Maazoun A, Belkassem B, Reymen B, Matthys S, Vantomme J and Lecompte D (2018), “Blast Response of RC Slabs with Externally Bonded Reinforcement: Experimental and Analytical Verification,” Composite Structures, 18th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics (ICEM18), Brussels, Belgium, 246–257.

  18. Moradi M, Vosoughifar H and Hassanzadeh Y (2014), “Optimal Placement of Smart Sensors in the Underground Storage Tanks Regarding to the Cavitation Effect by Monte Carlo Analysis,” 2nd International Conference on Structure, Architecture and Urban Development, Tabriz.

  19. Mousavi M, Ashrafi, Shafiepourmotlagh M, Niksokhan M and Vosoughifar H (2017), “Design of a Correlated Validated CFD and Genetic Algorithm Model for Optimized Sensors Placement for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring,” Heat Mass Transfer, 54(2): 509–521.

  20. Navarro M, Ivorra S and Varona FB (2018), “Parametric Computational Analysis for Punching Shear in RC Slabs,” Journal of Engineering Structures, 165: 254–263.

  21. Rao A, Lakshmi K and Krishnakumar S (2014), “A Generalized Optimal Sensor Placement Technique for Structural Health Monitoring and System Identification,” Procedia Engineering, 1st International Conference on Structural Integrity, 86: 529–538.

  22. Shokouhi SK and Vosoughifar H (2013a), “Optimal Sensor Placement in the Lightweight Steel Framing Structures Using the Novel TTFD Approach Subjected to Near-Fault Earthquakes,” Journal of Civil Structure Health Monitoring, 3: 257–267.

  23. Shokouhi SK and Vosoughifar H (2013b), “Optimal Sensor Placement in the Lightweight Steel Framing Structures Using the Novel TTFD Approach Subjected to Near-Fault Earthquakes,” Journal of Civil structure Health Monitoring, 3: 257–267.

  24. Shokouhi SK, Dolatshah A, Vosoughifar H, Hosseininejad SZ and Rahnavard Y (2013a), “Optimal Sensor Placement of TYTON Joints in the Water Pipeline Networks Subjected to Near-Fault and Far-Fault Earthquake,” Pipelines, ASCE, 736–746.

  25. Shokouhi SK, Dolatshah A, Vosoughifar H and Rahnavard Y (2013b), “Optimal Placement of Viscous Dampers in the water pipeline networks subjected to near-fault earthquakes using Genetic Algorithm,” Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference PVP, 8.

  26. Shokouhi SK, Dolatshah A, Vosoughifar H, Rahnavard Y and Dowlatshahi B (2013c), “Optimal Sensor Placement in the Base-Isolated Structures Subjected to Near-Fault Earthquakes Using a Novel TTFD Approach,” Proc. SPIE 8692, Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, 86924.

  27. Spathelf CA and Vogel T (2018), “Fatigue Performance of Orthogonally Reinforced Concrete Slabs: Experimental investigation,” Journal of Engineering Structures, 168: 69–81.

  28. Sun H and Büyüköztürk O (2015), “Optimal sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring Using Discrete Optimization,” Smart Mater and Structure, 24: 1–16.

  29. Talaslidis D and SOW I (1992), “A Discrete Kirchhoff Triangular Element for the Analysis of Thin Stiffened Shells,” Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece. Computers & Structures, 43(4): 663474.

  30. Thiagarajan G, Kadambi AV, Robert S and Johnson CF.(2015), “Experimental and Finite Element Analysis of Doubly Reinforced Concrete Slabs Subjected to Blast Loads,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 75: 162–173.

  31. Tang Teng, Yang Dong-Hui, Wang Lei, Zhang Jian-Ren and Yi Ting-Hua (2019), “Design and Application of Structural Health Monitoring System in Long-Span Cable-Membrane Structure,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 18(2): 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0484-y.

  32. Thomas G., Dohrmann C.R. (1994), “A Modal Test Design Strategy for Model Correlation,” Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference, Tennessee, USA, 927–933.

  33. Timoshenko S and Woinowsky-Krieger S (1959), “Theory of Plates and Shells, McGraw-Hill Classic Textbook Reissue Series,” 180–228.

  34. Vincenzi L and Simonini L (2017), “Influence of Model Errors in Optimal Sensor Placement,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 389: 119–133.

  35. Vosoughifar H and Shokouhi SK (2012), “Health Monitoring of LSF Structure via Novel TTFD Approach,” Civil Structural Health Monitoring Workshop (CSHM-4).

  36. Vosoughifar H, Shokouhi SK and Farshadmanesh P (2012), “Optimal Sensor Placement of Steel Structure with UBF System for SHM Using Hybrid FEMGA Technique,” Civil Structural Health Monitoring Workshop (CSHM-4).

  37. Vosoughifar H and Khorani M (2019), “Optimal Sensor Placement of RCC Dam using Modified Approach of COMAC-TTFD,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 1–15.

  38. Yi TH, Li HN and Gu GO (2011), “A New Method for Optimal Selection of Sensor Location on a High-Rise Building Using Simplified Finite Element Model,” Structural Engineering & Mechanics, 37(6): 671–684.

  39. Yi TH, Li HN and Gu M. (2011), “Optimal Sensor Placement for Structural Health Monitoring Based on Multiple Optimization Strategies,” Structure Design Tall Spec. Build, 20: 881–900.

  40. Yi TH, Li HN and Wang CW (2016), “Multiaxial Sensor Placement Optimization in Structural Health Monitoring Using Distributed Wolf Algorithm,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 23(4): 719–734.

  41. Yi TH, Li HN and Zhang XD (2012), “A Modified Monkey Algorithm for Optimal Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring,” Smart Materials and Structures, 21(10).

  42. Yi TH, Zhou GD, Li HN and Wang CW (2016), “Optimal Placement of Triaxial Sensors for Modal Identification Using Hierarchic Wolf Algorithm,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 24(8).

  43. Zhang J, Maes K, Roeck G, Reynders E, Papadimitriou C and Lombaert G (2017), “Optimal Sensor Placement for Multi-Setup Modal Analysis of Structures,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 401: 214–232.

  44. Zhou GD, Yi TH and Li HN (2014), “Sensor Placement Optimization in Structural Health Monitoring Using Cluster-In-Cluster Firefly Algorithm,” Advances in Structural Engineering, 17(8): 1103–1115.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to H. Vosoughifar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vosoughifar, H., Manafi, P. Sensor location in concrete slabs with various layout of opening using modified ‘FEMS-COMAC’ approach. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 19, 205–222 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-020-0557-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • two-way concrete slabs
  • openings
  • OSP
  • MAC
  • COMAC