Advertisement

Hyperstatic reaction method for calculations of tunnels with horseshoe-shaped cross-section under the impact of earthquakes

  • 2 Accesses

Abstract

Tunnels are now an integral part of the infrastructure in major cities around the world. For many reasons, these tunnels have horseshoe-shaped cross-sections with round top and flat bottom. This paper presents some improvements to the use of the Hyperstatic Reaction Method-HRM for analysing tunnels with horseshoe-shaped cross-sections when these tunnels operate under the influence of earthquakes, particularly in cases when the tunnel lining is a continuous lining. The analysis used parameters of a tunnel from the Hanoi metro system, as well as parameters of the strongest earthquake that may occur in the central Hanoi area in the improved HRM and 2D numerical methods using the ABAQUS software. On the basis of the results obtained, the paper gives conclusions about the HRM methodology when it is used to calculate tunnels that have horseshoe cross-sections operating under the influence of earthquakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

References

  1. Do NA, Dias D, Oreste PP and Djeran-Maigre I (2014), “A New Numerical Approach to the Hyperstatic Reaction Method for Segmental Tunnel Linings,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 38(15): 1617–1632.

  2. Fu J, Liang J and Qin L (2016), “Dynamic Soil-Tunnel Interaction in Layered Half-Space for Incident Plane SH Waves,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 15(4): 715–727.

  3. Gospodarikov A and Thanh NC (2017), “Liquefaction Possibility of Soil Layers During Earthquake in Hanoi,” International Journal of GEOMATE, 13(39): 148–155.

  4. Gospodarikov A and Thanh NC (2018a), “The Impact of Earthquakes of Tunnel Linings: A Case Study from the Hanoi Metro System,” International Journal of GEOMATE, 14(41): 151–158.

  5. Gospodarikov A and Thanh NC (2018b), “Behaviour of Segmental Tunnel Linings under the Impact of Earthquakes: A Case Study from the Tunnel of Hanoi Metro System,” International Journal of GEOMATE, 15(48): 91–98.

  6. Huebner KH, Dewhirst DL, Smith DE and Byrom TG (2001), The Finite Element Method for Engineers, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.

  7. Jayasinghe JASC, Hori M, Riaz MR, Wijerathne MLL and Ichimura T (2017), “Conversion Between Solid and Beam Element Solutions of Finite Element Method Based on Meta-Modeling Theory: Development and Application to a Ramp Tunnel Structure,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 16(2): 297–309.

  8. Möller S (2006), “Tunnel Induced Settlements and Structural Forces in Linings,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stuttgart University, Germany.

  9. Naggar HE and Hinchberger SD (2008), “An Analytical Solution for Jointed Tunnel Linings in Elastic Soil or Rock,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45: 1572–1593.

  10. Oreste PP (2007), “A Numerical Approach to the Hyperstatic Reaction Method for the Dimensioning of Tunnel Supports,” Tunnelling and Underground space Technology, 22: 185–205.

  11. Penzien J and Wu C (1998), “Stresses in Linings of Bored Tunnels,” Journal of Earthquake Eng. Structural Dynamics, 27: 283–300.

  12. Penzien Z (2000), “Seismically Induced Racking of Tunnel Linings,” Int. J. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynamic, 29: 683–691.

  13. Protosenya AG and Verbilo PE (2017), “Research of Compression Strength of Fissured Rock Mass,” Journal of Mining Institute, 223: 51–57.

  14. Rodríguez-Castellanos A, Carbajal-Romero M, Flores-Guzmán N, Rodríguez-Sánchez JE and Kryvko A (2017), “Near Shore Seismic Movements Induced by Seaquakes Using the Boundary Element Method,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 16(3): 571–585.

  15. Schulze H and Duddeck H (1964), “Spannungen in Schildvorgetrieben Tunnel,” Beton and Stahlbetonbau, 8: 169–175.

  16. Systra (2005), “Hanoi Pilot LRT Line Feasibility Study,” Executive summary, Hanoi, Vietnam.

  17. Takano YH (2000), “Guidelines for the Design of Shield Tunnel Lining,” Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 15(3): 303–331.

  18. The Southern California Earthquake Data Center (SCEDC) (2018), Data of El Centro Earthquake, http://scedc.caltech.edu/,USA.

  19. Wang DY and Yuan JX (2009), “Research on Calculation Methods of Surrounding Rock Pressure on Shallow and Bias Double-Arch Tunnel,” Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 29(2): 172–176.

  20. Wang, JG, Kong SL and Leung CF (2003), “Twin Tunnels-Induced Ground Settlement in Soft Soil,” Proceeding of the Sino-Japanese Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering, Beijing, China, 241–244.

  21. Wang JN (1993), Seismic Design of Tunnels: A State of the Art Approach,” Monograph 7, Parsons Brinkerhoff Quad & Douglas Inc, NewYork, USA.

  22. Wood JH (2004), “Earthquake Design Procedures for Rectangular Underground Structures,” Project Report to Earthquake Commission, EQC Project No 01/470, New Zealand.

  23. Wood JH (2005), “Earthquake Design of Rectangular Underground Structures,” NZSEE Conference, New Zealand, 39–47.

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Saint Petersburg Mining University. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments that were very valuable for revising the manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Thanh Nguyen Chi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chi, T.N., Alexandr, G. Hyperstatic reaction method for calculations of tunnels with horseshoe-shaped cross-section under the impact of earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 19, 179–188 (2020) doi:10.1007/s11803-020-0555-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • hyperstatic reaction method
  • earthquake
  • horseshoe cross-section
  • impact
  • tunnel