Direct use of peak ground motion parameters for the estimation of inelastic displacement ratio of SDOF systems subjected to repeated far fault ground motions
- 50 Downloads
This study is aimed at developing statistical equations to estimate the inelastic displacement ratio of singledegree- of-freedom systems subjected to far fault repeated earthquakes. In the study, peak ground motion parameters are used to define the scatter of the original data. The ratio of peak ground acceleration to peak ground velocity, and peak ground velocity of the ground motion records and structural parameters such as period of vibration and lateral strength ratio are used in the proposed equations. For the development of the equations, nonlinear time history analyses of single-degree-offreedom systems are conducted. Then, the results are used in a multivariate regression procedure. The equations are verified by comparing the estimated results with the calculated results. The average error and coefficient of variation of the proposed equations are presented. The analyses results revealed that the direct use of peak ground motion parameters for the estimation of inelastic displacement ratio significantly reduced the scatter in the original data and yielded accurate results. From the comparative results it is also observed that results obtained using equations specific to peak ground velocity or peak ground acceleration to peak ground velocity ratio are similar.
KeywordsC1 peak ground velocity peak ground acceleration far fault ground motions sequential ground motions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- American Society of Civil Engineers (2007), Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI Standard.Google Scholar
- Applied Technology Council (2005), “Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures,” Report FEMA 440, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2005.Google Scholar
- Building Seismic Safety Council (2000), Pre-Standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Fajfar P and Fischinger M (1988), “N2—a Method for Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Regular Structures,” Proc., 9th World Conferance on Earthquake Engineering, 5: 111–116.Google Scholar
- Gutenberg B and Richter CF. (1944), “Frequency of Earthquakes in California,” Bull Seism Soc Am, 34: 185–188.Google Scholar
- Iervolino I, Chioccarelli E and Baltzopoulos G (2012), “Inelastic Displacement Ratio of Near-Source Pulse-Like Ground Motions,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41(15): 2351–2357.Google Scholar
- Joyner WB and Boore DM (1982), “Prediction of Earthquake Response Spectra,” USGS Openfile report, 82–977.Google Scholar
- Miranda E (1991), “Seismic Evaluation and Upgrading of Existing Structures,” PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
- Muria Vila D and Toro Jaramillo AM (1998) “Effects of Several Events Recorded at a Building Founded on Soft Soil,” 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris.Google Scholar
- Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), Strong Ground Motion Database, http://peer.berkeley.edu/, [30.01.14].
- Trombetti T, Silvestri S, Gasparini G, Righi M and Ceccoli C (2008), “Correlations Between the Displacement Response Spectra and the Parameters Characterizing the Magnitude of the Ground Motion,” 14. World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
- Veletsos AS and Newmark N (1960), “Effect of Inelastic Behavior on the Response of Simple Systems to Earthquake Motions,” Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2: 895–912.Google Scholar