Climatology of Wind-Seas and Swells in the China Seas from Wave Hindcast
- 1 Downloads
The wind-sea and swell climates in the China Seas are investigated by using the 27-yr Integrated Ocean Waves for Geophysical and other Applications (IOWAGA) hindcast data. A comparison is made between the significant wave height from the IOWAGA hindcasts and that from a jointly calibrated altimetry dataset, showing the good performance of the IOWAGA hindcasts in the China Seas. A simple but practical method of diagnosing whether the sea state is wind-sea-dominant or swell-dominant is proposed based on spectral partitioning. Different from the characteristics of wind-seas and swells in the open ocean, the wave fields in the enclosed seas such as the China Seas are predominated by wind-sea events in respect of both frequencies of occurrences and energy weights, due to the island sheltering and limited fetches. The energy weights of wind-seas in a given location is usually more significant than the occurrence probability of wind-sea-dominated events, as the wave energy is higher in the wind-sea events than in the swell events on average and extreme wave heights are mostly related to wind-seas. The most energetic swells in the China Seas (and other enclosed seas) are ‘local swells’, having just propagated out of their generation areas. However, the swells coming from the West Pacific also play an important role in the wave climate of the China Seas, which can only be revealed by partitioning different swell systems in the wave spectra as the energy of them is significantly less than the ‘local swells’.
Key wordsthe China Seas wind-sea swell wave climate WAVEWATCH III
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The altimeter data and the IOWAGA data are both from IFREMER ftp (ftp.ifremer.fr). This work is jointly supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC1404700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41806010), Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modeling, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (No. 2019A03), the Discipline Layout Project for Basic Research of Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee (No. 20170418), and the Guangdong Special Fund Program for Marine Economy Development (No. GDME-2018E001).
- Ardhuin, F., Rogers, E., Babanin, A., Filipot, J., Magne, R., Roland, A., Van der Westhuysen, A., Queffeulou, P., Lefevre, J., Aouf, L., and Collard, F., 2010. Semi-empirical dissipation source functions for ocean wave. Part I: Definition, cali-bration and validation. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 40: 1917–1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gulev, S. K., Grigorieva, V., Sterl, A., and Woolf, D., 2003. Assessment of the reliability of wave observations from voluntary observing ships: Insights from the validation of a global wind wave climatology based on voluntary observing ship data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108: 3236–3236.Google Scholar
- Jiang, H., Mouche, A., Wang, H., Babanin, A. V., Chapron, B., and Chen, G., 2017. Limitation of SAR quasi-linear inversion data on swell climate: An example of global crossing swells. Remote Sensing, 9 (2): 107, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020107.
- Kinsman, B., 1965. Wind Wave. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1–676.Google Scholar
- Liang, B., Liu, X., Li, H., Wu, Y., and Lee, D., 2016. Wave climate hindcasts for the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and East China Sea. Journal of Coastal Research, 32: 172–180.Google Scholar
- Queffeulou, P., Ardhuin, F., and Lefèvre, J. M., 2011. Wave height measurements from altimeters: Validation status and applications. OSTST Meeting, Ocean Surface Topography Science Team. San Diego, 19–21.Google Scholar
- Tolman, H. L., and the WAVEWATCH III® Development Group, 2014. User manual and system documentation of WAVEWATCH III® version 4.18. Technical Note 316. NOAA/NWS/NCEP/MMAB, U. S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, College Park, Md, 1–282.Google Scholar
- Uppala, S. M., Kållberg, P. W., Simmons, A. J., Andrae, U., Bechtold, V. D. C., Fiorino, M., Gibson, J. K., Haseler, J., Hernandez, A., Kelly, G. A., Li, X., Onogi, K., Saarinen, S., Sokka, N., Allan, R. P., Andersson, E., Arpe, K., Balmaseda, M. A., Beljaars, A. C. M., Van De Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Caires, S., Chevallier, F., Dethof, A., Dragosavac, M., Fisher, M., Fuentes, M., Hagemann, S., Hólm, E., Hoskins, B. J., Isaksen, L., Janssen, P. A. E. M., Jenne, R., McNally, A. P., Mahfouf, J. F., Morcrette, J. J., Rayner, N. A., Saunders, R. W., Simon, P., Sterl, A., Trenberth, K. E., Untch, A., Vasiljevic, D., Viterbo, P., and Woollen, J., 2005. The ERA-40 re-analysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 131: 2961–3012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Young, I. R., Sanina, E., and Babanin, A. V., 2017. Calibration and cross validation of a global wind and wave database of altimeter, radiometer, and scatterometer measurements. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 34 (6): 1285–1306, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0145.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar