Advertisement

Comparison between responses of reinforced and unreinforced embankments due to road widening

  • Xiao-ming Huang (黄晓明)Email author
  • Hao Wang (汪 浩)
Article

Abstract

The objective of this work is to compare the responses of geosynthetically-reinforced embankment and unreinforced embankment due to road widening by using the centrifuge model tests and a two-dimensional (2D) finite element (FE) model. The measured and calculated responses of the embankment and foundation exposed to road widening include the settlement, horizontal displacement, pore water pressure, and shear stresses. It is found that the road widening changed the transverse slope of the original pavement surface resulting from the nonuniform settlements. The maximum horizontal movement is found to be located at the shoulder of the original embankment. Although the difference is small, it is clearly seen that the geosynthetic reinforcement reduces the nonuniform settlements and horizontal movements due to road widening. Thus the reinforcement reduces the potential of pavement cracking and increases the stability of the embankment on soft ground in road widening.

Key words

reinforcement centrifuge model test finite element model embankment road widening 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    LUDLOW S J, CHEN W F, BOURDEAU P L, LOVELL P L. Embankment widening and grade raising on soft foundation soils. Phase 2: Research project final report: joint highway research project [R]. West Lafayette: Purdue University, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    VOS E, COUVREUR J F, VERMAUT M. Comparison of numerical analysis with field data of a road widening project on peaty soil [C]// Proceeding of International Workshop: Advances in Understanding and Modeling the Mechanical Behavior of Peat. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1994: 267–274.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    WANG H, HUANG X. Centrifuge model test and numerical analysis of embankment widening on soft ground [C]// Proc Applications of Advanced Technologies in Trans Eng of the 8th International Conf. Beijing, 2004: 548–553.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    WANG H, HUANG X. The study of ground and embankment treatment techniques in road widening, geotechnical special publication no.154: Pavement mechanics and foundations [C]// Proc of Sessions of Geo-Shanghai 2006. Reston, VA: ASCE Geo Institute, 2006: 212–219.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    LING J, QIAN J, HUANG Q. Failure mechanism and design criterion for low-volume roads subgrade widening, transportation research record 1989 [C]// TRB, National Research Council. Washington DC, 2007: 135–141.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    DESCHAMPS R J, HYNES C S, BOURDEAU P. Embankment widening design guidelines and construction procedures, research project final report [R]. West Lafayette: Purdue University, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    FORSMAN J, UOTINEN V. Synthetic reinforcement in the widening of a road embankment on soft foundation, geotechnical engineering for transportation infrastructure [C]// Proc of the 12th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1999: 1489–1496.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    BLACKWOOD T W, VULOVA C V. Geogrid reinforced embankment constructed over peat soils in clark county, Washington: Design and field performance [C]// Proceedings of 2007 Airfield and Highway Pavement Conference. Atlanta, GA: ASCE T&DI, 2006: 317–328.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    LIU H L, CHARLES W W NG, FEI K. Performance of a geogrid-reinforced and pile-supported highway embankment over soft clay: Case study [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(12): 1483–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    HU Y C, ZHANG Y, LIN H, CAI Y, GUO H. Research on effecting factors of embankment reinforced with geogrid [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2008, 32(2): 206–209. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    QIAN J S, LING J, HUANG Q. 3D finite element analysis of embankment reinforced by geogrid [J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2003, 31(12): 1421–1425. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    SHARMA J S, BOLTON M D. Centrifugal and numerical modeling of reinforced embankments on soft clay installed with wick drains [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2001, 19(11): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    VISWANADHAM B V S, MAHAJAN R. Modeling of feotextile reinforced highway slopes in a geotechnical centrifuge, geotechnical engineering for transportation projects [C]// Proceedings of Geo-Trans 2004. Los Angeles, CA: ASCE, 2004: 637–646.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    VISWANADHAM B V S, JESSBERGER H L. Centrifuge modeling of geosynthetic reinforced clay liners of landfills [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2005, 131(5): 564–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    ARRIAGA F. Study of strain distribution in geosynthetic-reinforced slopes using digital image analysis [D]. Boulder, CO: Colorado University, 2000.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    SHARMA J S, BOLTON M D. Centrifuge modeling of an embankment on soft clay reinforced with a geogrid [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 1996, 14(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    SHARMA J S, BOLTON M D. Finite element analysis of centrifuge tests on reinforced embankments on soft clay [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 1996, 19(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    LESHCHINSKY D, BOEDEKER R H. Geosynthetic reinforcement soil structure [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1989, 115(10): 1459–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    KRAHN J. Stress and deformation modeling with SIGMA/W [R]. Calgary, Canda: GEO-SLOPE International, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    DUNCAN J M, CHANG C. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1970, 6(5): 1629–1653.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    CHEN X, ZHANG J, AN G. Test study of red stone granular soil’s rheological property in road embankment engineering [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2007, 38(1): 154–159. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    DENG J, BIAN L. Response and energy dissipation of rock under stochastic stress waves [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2007, 14(1): 111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    XU Z, SU C. The Design of ground treatment on the joint of hu-ning and xi-cheng expressway [J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 1998, 18(2): 49–51. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    ZHU X, HUANG X, DENG X. The study of mechanism of geo-grid reinforced embankment [J]. Journal of Highway Science and Technology, 2001, 17(1): 1–5. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University Press and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao-ming Huang (黄晓明)
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hao Wang (汪 浩)
    • 2
  1. 1.School of TransportationSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations