Displacement and deformation analysis for uplift piles
- 108 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
On the assumptions that the shear resistance increases linearly with increasing shear displacement between the uplift pile and surrounding soil, that the axis force is distributed as parabola along the pile length, that elastic distortion occurs when the pile is loaded, that the displacement of pile is in accord with that of the soil, and that the uplift pile failure is regarded as the soil failure, a rational calculation method was proposed for calculating the deformation, ultimate displacement and shear resistance of piles. The distributions of frictional resistance and the shear displacement along the pile length were obtained with the method. The comparisons were made between the measurement results and the present results. The present theoretical results agree well with the measurement results, with the average difference being less than 12% before failure. The comparisons show that the proposed method is reasonable for uplift design and engineering construction of piles.
Key words
uplift pile load transfer mechanism displacement deformationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]HUANG Feng, LI Guang-xin, LU He. Analysis of deformation of tension in sand soil [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 1999, 32(2): 31–36. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- [2]LEHANE B M, JARDINE R J, BOND A J, FRAND R. Mechanisms of friction in sand from instrumented pile tests [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1993, 119(1): 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]CAIRO R, CONTE E. Settlement analysis of pile groups in layered soils [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2006, 43(8): 788–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]ZHANG C, YIN J. Field static load tests on drilled shaft founded on or socketed into rock [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2000, 37(5): 1283–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]SERRANO A, OLALLA C. Tensile resistance of rock anchors [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1999, 36(3): 449–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]HOEK E, BROWN E T. Practical estimates of rock masses strength [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(7): 1165–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]YANG Xiao-li, YIN Jian-hua. Slope stability analysis with nonlinear failure criterion [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130(3): 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]YANG Xiao-li, LI Liang, YIN Jian-hua. Seismic and static stability analysis for rock slopes by a kinematical approach [J]. Geotechnique, 2004, 54(8): 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]YANG Xiao-li, LI Liang, YIN Jian-hua. Stability analysis of rock slopes with a modified Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2004, 28(2): 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]EMMETT K. Pile disturbance in layered ground [J]. Ground Engineering, 2005, 38(12): 30–32.Google Scholar
- [11]WANG Tao, LIU Jin-li. Tests on influence of pile-soil-pile interaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(1): 100–105. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- [12]ZHAO P, JI S. Refinement of shear-lag model and its application [J]. Tectonophisics, 1997, 279(1): 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]YANG Xiao-li. Seismic displacement of rock slopes with nonlinear Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(6): 948–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [14]ABRAMENTO M, WHITTLE J A. Analysis of pullout tests for planar reinforcements in soil [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1995, 121(6): 476–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]LEE K M, XIAO Z R. A simplified nonlinear approach for pile group settlement analysis in multilayered soils [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2001, 38(5): 1063–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar