Advertisement

Applied Geophysics

, Volume 15, Issue 3–4, pp 556–565 | Cite as

3D magnetotelluric inversions with unstructured finite-element and limited-memory quasi-Newton methods

  • Xiao-Yue Cao
  • Chang-Chun YinEmail author
  • Bo Zhang
  • Xin Huang
  • Yun-He Liu
  • Jing Cai
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Traditional 3D Magnetotelluric (MT) forward modeling and inversions are mostly based on structured meshes that have limited accuracy when modeling undulating surfaces and arbitrary structures. By contrast, unstructured-grid-based methods can model complex underground structures with high accuracy and overcome the defects of traditional methods, such as the high computational cost for improving model accuracy and the difficulty of inverting with topography. In this paper, we used the limited-memory quasi-Newton (L-BFGS) method with an unstructured finite-element grid to perform 3D MT inversions. This method avoids explicitly calculating Hessian matrices, which greatly reduces the memory requirements. After the first iteration, the approximate inverse Hessian matrix well approximates the true one, and the Newton step (set to 1) can meet the sufficient descent condition. Only one calculation of the objective function and its gradient are needed for each iteration, which greatly improves its computational efficiency. This approach is well-suited for large-scale 3D MT inversions. We have tested our algorithm on data with and without topography, and the results matched the real models well. We can recommend performing inversions based on an unstructured finite-element method and the L-BFGS method for situations with topography and complex underground structures.

Keywords

Magnetotelluric (MT) 3D inversion unstructured finite-element method quasi-Newton method L-BFGS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the reviewers and AP editors for their comments and suggestions, which have helped improve the clarity of this paper.

References

  1. Avdeev, D., and Avdeeva, A., 2009, 3D magnetotelluric inversion using a limited–memory quasi–Newton optimization: Geophysics, 74(3), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cao, X. Y., Yin, C., Zhang, B., Xin, H., Ren, X., and Qiu, C., et al., 2017, A goal–oriented adaptive finite–element algorithm for 3D anisotropic MT modelling: 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, H1–H4.Google Scholar
  3. deGroot–Hedlin, C., and Constable, S., 1990, Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two–dimensional models from magnetotelluric data: Geophysics, 55(12), 1613–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dennis, J. E., and Schnabel, R. B., 1983, Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall, New Jersey, 86–110.Google Scholar
  5. Egbert, G. D., and Kelbert, A., 2012, Computational recipes for electromagnetic inverse problems: Geophysical Journal International, 189(1), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grayver, A. V., 2015, Parallel three–dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using adaptive finite–element method, Part I: theory and synthetic study: Geophysical Journal International, 202(1), 584–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gürer, A., and Ìlkisik, O. M., 1997, The importance of topographic corrections on magnetotelluric response data from rugged regions of Anatolia: Geophysical prospecting, 45(1), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jahandari, H., and Farquharson, C. G., 2017, 3–D minimumstructure inversion of magnetotelluric data using the finite–element method and tetrahedral grids: Geophysical Journal International, 211(2), 1189–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu, Y. H., and Yin, C. C., 2013, 3D inversion for frequency–domain HEM data: Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 56(12), 4278–428.Google Scholar
  10. Liu, D. C., and Nocedal, J., 1989, On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization: Math. Program, 45, 503–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mackie, R. L., and Madden, T. R., 1993, Three–dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using conjugate gradients: Geophysical Journal International, 115(1), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nocedal, J., 1980, Updating quasi–Newton matrices with limited storage: Mathematics of computation, 35(151), 773–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Newman, G. A., and Alumbaugh, D. L., 2000, Threedimensional magnetotelluric inversion using nonlinear conjugate gradients: Geophysical journal international, 140(2), 410–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Newman, G. A., and Boggs, P. T., 2004, Solution accelerators for large–scale three–dimensional electromagnetic inverse problems: Inverse Problems, 20(6), S151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodi, W. L., and Mackie, R. L., 2000, Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2–D magnetotelluric inversion: Geophysics, 66(1), 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ren, Z., Kalscheuer, T., Greenhalgh, S., and Maurer, H., 2013, A goal–oriented adaptive finite–element approach for plane wave 3–D electromagnetic modelling: Geophysical Journal International, 194(2), 700–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith, J. T., and Booker, J. R, 1991, Rapid inversion of two–and three–dimensional magnetotelluric data: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 96(B3), 3905–3922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schwalenberg, K., and Edwards, R. N., 2004, The effect of seafloor topography on magnetotelluric fields: an analytical formulation confirmed with numerical results: Geophysical Journal International, 159(2), 607–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Siripunvaraporn, W., and Egbert, G., 2009, WSINV3DMT: vertical magnetic field transfer function inversion and parallel implementation: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 173(3), 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tikhonov, A. N., and Arsenin, V. Y., 1977, Solutions to Illposed Problems: John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 45–87.Google Scholar
  21. Usui, Y., 2015, 3–D inversion of magnetotelluric data using unstructured tetrahedral elements: applicability to data affected by topography: Geophysical Journal International, 202(2), 828–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yin, C. C., Zhang, B., and Liu, Y. H., 2017, A goal–oriented adaptive algorithm for 3D magnetotelluric forward modeling: Chinese J. Geophys (in Chinese), 60(1), 327–336.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editorial Office of Applied Geophysics and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao-Yue Cao
    • 1
  • Chang-Chun Yin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bo Zhang
    • 1
  • Xin Huang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yun-He Liu
    • 1
  • Jing Cai
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Geo-exploration Science and TechnologyJilin UniversityChangchunChina
  2. 2.Department of Earth SciencesMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations