Advertisement

Applied Geophysics

, Volume 15, Issue 3–4, pp 382–392 | Cite as

The comparison of different spectrum analysis methods for LOD time series

  • Hai-Bo Lin
  • Juan ZhaoEmail author
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

The variations in the Earth’s rotation are important to space dynamic theory and natural disasters because they affect the length-of-day (LOD) and consequently human lives. We use maximum entropy method (MEM), Lomb method (LOMB), and phase dispersion minimization (PDM) to determine the natural periods of equally spaced LOD time series. We transform the observational monthly LOD time series (LODM) to unequally sampled series (LODMD) by removing every fourth, third, and half of the total samples. We also apply spline interpolation to LODMD to yield equally spaced time series (LODMDN). The results suggest that regardless of the time series, the MEM frequency is 0.1660 month−1 and 0.0840 month−1, whereas LOMB and PDM yield 0.166 month−1 and 0.083 month−1, respectively. Furthermore, missing data that are less than half of the total data or spline interpolation do not affect the analysis. For the amplitude, neither missing data nor spline interpolation affect the analysis.

Keywords

LOD MEM LOMB PDM Unequally 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the International Earth Rotation and Reference System Service (IERS) for providing the length-of-day (LOD) data and the editors and reviewers for suggestions that improved the manuscript.

References

  1. An, T., Wang, J., Lu, X., Lao, B., Wei, Y., Dong, D., Lu, Y., and Wu, X., 2016, Review of Periodicity Searching Algorithms of Astronomical Light Curves: Progress in Astronomy, 34(1), 74–93.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, R. T. H., Hide, R., White, A. A., and Wilson, C. A., 1983, Atmospheric angular momentum fluctuations, length–of–day changes and polar motion: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A–Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 387, 31–73.Google Scholar
  3. Borisov, A. A., Bruevich, E. A., Bruevich, V. V., Rozgacheva, I. K., and Shimanovskaya, E. V., 2015, Wavelet–analysis of series of observations of relative sunspot numbers. The dependence of the periods of cyclic activity on the time at different time scales: https://doi.org/arxiv.org/pdf/1512.04098.pdf Google Scholar
  4. Coughlan, C. P., and Gabzuda, D. C., 2013, MEM imaging of multi–wavelength VLBA polarization observations of Active Galactic Nuclei: https://doi.org/arxiv.org/pdf/1307.6757.Google Scholar
  5. Ding, Y.–R., 1998, Astronomical data processing method: Nanjing, Nanjing University, 190–214.Google Scholar
  6. Dong, D., Gross, R. S., and Dickey, J. O., 1996, Seasonal variations of the Earth’s gravitational field: an analysis of atmospheric pressure, ocean tidal and surface water excitation: Geophysical Research Letters, 23, 725–740.Google Scholar
  7. Duan, P., Liu, G., Hu, X., Sun, Y., and Li, H., 2017, Possible damping model of the 6 year oscillation signal in length of day: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 265, 35–42.Google Scholar
  8. Escapa, A., Getino, J., Ferrándiz, J. M., and Baenas, T., 2017, Dynamical adjustments in IAU 2000A nutation series arising from IAU 2006 precession: Astronomy & Astrophysics, 604(A92), 1–13.Google Scholar
  9. Foster, G., 1996, Wavelets for Period Analysis of Unevenly Sampled Time Series: The Astronomical Journal, 112(4), 1709–1729.Google Scholar
  10. Hao, L., and Zhang, C., 2017, Discussion on the space geodetic measurement method for earth rotation parameters: Science and Technology and Innovation, 2017(2), 7–8.Google Scholar
  11. Hide, R. and Dickey, K. O., 1991, Earth’s variable rotation: Science, 253, 629–637.Google Scholar
  12. Kang, G., Bai, C., and Gao, G., 2008, Periodical characteristics of the geomagnetic secular variation and length–of–day variation: Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 51(2), 369–375.Google Scholar
  13. Lambeck, K. and Cazenave A., 1976, Long term variations in the length of day and climate: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 46, 555–573.Google Scholar
  14. Li, Y.–X. and Zhao, J., 2012, Maximum Entropy Spectrum Analysis of Unequally Spaced ?LOD, Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 48(1), 29–32.Google Scholar
  15. Liao, D., 2000, Main excitation sources of ΔLOD on interannual time scale: Acta Astronomica Sinica, 41(2), 139–147.Google Scholar
  16. Lomb, N. R., 1976, Least–Squares Frequency Analysis of Unequally Spaced Data: Astrophysics and Space Science, 39, 447–462.Google Scholar
  17. Lu, J. C., Wang, J. Y., An, T., Lin, J. M., and Qiu, H. B. 2012, Periodic radio variability in NRAO 530: phase dispersion minimization analysis: Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 643–650.Google Scholar
  18. Ma, L., Liao, D., and Han, Y., 2006, Atmospheric and oceanic excitations to LOD change on quasi–biennial time scales: Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 6(6), 759–768.Google Scholar
  19. Ma, L., and Han, Y., 2006, Atmospheric excitation of time variable length–of–day on seasonal scales: Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 6(1), 120–124.Google Scholar
  20. Ma, L., Han, Y., and Liao, D., 2008, 50–day oscillation of length–of–day change: Earth Moon Planets, 103(1–2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  21. Milyukov, V., Mironov, A., Kravchuk, V., Amoruso, A., and Crescentini, L., 2012, Short–period variations of the Earth’s rotation rate and global deformation processes in the Lithosphere: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 14, 3392.Google Scholar
  22. Na, S.–H., Cho, J., Kim, T.–H, Seo, K., Youm, K., Yoo, S.–M., Choi, B., and Yoon, H., 2016, Changes in the Earth’s Spin Rotation due to the Atmospheric Effects and Reduction in Glaciers: Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences, 33(4), 295–304.Google Scholar
  23. Naeeni, M. R., and Saheb, R. A., 2017, Study of the effects of large earthquakes on the excitation of polar motion and the change in length of day: Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, 43(1), 33–51.Google Scholar
  24. Narayan, R., and Nityananda, R., 1986, Maximum entropy image restoration in astronomy: Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics, 24, 127–170.Google Scholar
  25. Nemec, A. F. L., and Nemec, J. M., 1985, A test of significance for periods derived using phase–dispersionminimization techniques: The Astronomical Journal, 90, 2317–2320.Google Scholar
  26. Nyambuya, G. G., 2014, Secular Increase in the Earth’s LOD Strongly implies that the Earth Might Be Expanding Radially on a Global Scale: International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 4(1), 244–249.Google Scholar
  27. Pais, A., and Hulot, G., 2000, Length of day decade variations, torsional oscillations and inner core super rotation–evidence from recovered core surface zonal flows: Physics of the Earth & Planetary Interiors, 118(3), 291–316.Google Scholar
  28. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P., 1992, Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: Cambridge University Press, UK, 559–570.Google Scholar
  29. Scargle, J. D., 1982, Studies in Astronomical Time Series Analysis. II. Statistical Aspects of Spectral Analysis of Unevenly Spaced Data: Astrophysics Journey, 263, 835–853.Google Scholar
  30. Schindelegger, M., Salstein, D., Einšpigel, D., and Mayerhofer, C., 2017, Diurnal atmosphere–ocean signals in Earth’s rotation rate and a possible modulation through ENSO: Geophysical Research Letters, 44(6), 2755–2762.Google Scholar
  31. Scrutton, C. T., and Hipkin, R. G., 1973, Long–term changes in the rotation rate of the Earth: Earth Science Reviews, 9(3), 259–274.Google Scholar
  32. Singh, Y. P., and Badruddin, 2014, Prominent short–, mid–, and long–term periodicities in solar and geomagnetic activity–Wavelet analysis: Planetary and Space Science, 96, 120–124.Google Scholar
  33. Stellingwerf, R. F., 1978, Period determination using phase dispersion minimization: Astrophysical Journal, 224, 953–960.Google Scholar
  34. Zechmeister, M., and Kürster, M., 2009, The generalised Lomb–Scargle periodogram A new formalism for the floating–mean and Keplerian periodgrams: Astronomy and Astrophysics, 496, 577–584.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editorial Office of Applied Geophysics and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AstronomyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations