Advertisement

Agricultural Development and Implication for Wetlands Sustainability: A Case from Baoqing County, Northeast China

  • Chong Fang
  • Zhidan Wen
  • Lin Li
  • Jia Du
  • Ge Liu
  • Xiaodi Wang
  • Kaishan SongEmail author
Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Historical thematic maps and remote sensing data were applied to address spatiotemporal dynamics of land use/land cover (LULC) changes and its impact on wetlands sustainability based on eight LULC datasets from 1954 to 2015 in Baoqing County, Northeast China. This study demonstrated that LULC drastically changed in the past six decades due to conversion of wetlands, woodland, and grassland into cropland. The cropland was 578.8 km2 in 1954, accounting for 5.8% of the area in Baoqing County, and it increased to 54.3% in 2015, which was nearly equivalent to 9.4 times of that in 1954. Cropland increased 4843.6 km2 from 1954 to 2015 with average increased area of 79.4 km2/yr. The conversion of wetlands was the main reason for cropland increase (49.7%), and woodland (18%) and grassland (16.3%) conversion were other reasons. Results also revealed that 78% of wetlands were lost during the past six decades, of which 91.2% were converted cropland. Population increasing (population across Baoqing in 2015 was 7.8 times of that in 1949), agricultural technology development was the main reason for cropland increase, institutional and economic policies also played important roles for cropland dynamics, particularly paddy field influenced by market price. Agricultural development has caused severe wetlands degradation both in area and functionality, and still being the major threads for wetlands sustainable development. Several suggestions concerning the future land use policy formulation and wetlands sustainability were proposed. They are adjusting the ‘food first’ agricultural policy, reinforce management for wetlands nature reserves, creating infrastructure for the rational use of surface and groundwater, harnessing the degraded cultivated land.

Keywords

Baoqing County cropland Geographic Information System (GIS) Remote Sensing (RS) wetlands 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the staff and master students of Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences for their efforts in field data collection and laboratory analysis. Special thanks also go to Dr. Liu Huanjun, Duan Hongtao, Chen Ming, and Miss Jin Cui for their hard work during the LULC dataset establishing process.

References

  1. Baoqing County Bureau of Statistics, Heilongjiang Province, 1949–2006. Baoqing County National Economic Statistics Yearbook. Internal Information. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. Barson M, Randall L, Bordas V, 2000. Land Cover Changes in Australia. Canberra: Bureau of Rural Science.Google Scholar
  3. Bedford B L, Preston E M, 1988. Developing the scientific basis for assessing cumulative effects of wetland loss and degradation on landscape functions: status, perspectives, and prospects. Environmental Management, 12(5): 751–771. doi: 10.1007/bf01867550Google Scholar
  4. Büttner G, Feranec J, Jaffrain G, 2002. Corine Land cover update 2000: technical guideline. Technical Report No 89. EEA. Available at https://doi.org/www.eea.europa.eu/publications/technical_report_2002_89.2002-12-18 Google Scholar
  5. Chen H Y, Zou J Y, Cui J et al., 2018. Wetland drying increases the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 120: 24–27. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.035Google Scholar
  6. Cyranoski D, 2009. Putting China’s wetlands on the map. Nature, 458(7235): 134.Google Scholar
  7. De los Santos-Montero L A, Bravo-Ureta B E, 2017. Natural resource management and household well-being: the case of POSAF-II in Nicaragua. World Development, 99: 42–59. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.001Google Scholar
  8. Dumitrascu M, Mocanu I, Mitrica B et al., 2018. The assessment of socio-economic vulnerability to drought in Southern Romania (Oltenia Plain). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 27: 142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.049Google Scholar
  9. Gerakis A, Kalburtji K, 1998. Agricultural activities affecting the functions and values of Ramsar wetland sites of Greece. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 70(2–3): 119–128. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00119-4Google Scholar
  10. Fang Chong, Song Kaishan, Li Lin et al, 2018. Spatial variability and temporal dynamics of HABs in Northeast China. Ecological Indicators, 90: 280–294. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018. 03.006Google Scholar
  11. Gao Chuanyu, Zhang Shaoqing, Liu Hanxiang et al, 2018. The impacts of land reclamation on the accumulation of key elements in wetland ecosystems in the Sanjiang Plain, northeast China. Environmental Pollution, 237: 487–498. doi: 10.1016/j. envpol.2018.02.075Google Scholar
  12. Gong P, Niu Z G, Chen X et al., 2010. China’s wetland change (1990–2000) determined by remote sensing. Science in China Earth Sciences, 53(7): 1036–1042. doi: 10.1007/s11430-010-4002-3Google Scholar
  13. Guo Zhixing, Wang Zongming, Song Kaishan et al., 2008. Spatial features of productivity variability of marsh in the Sanjiang Plain. Wetland Science, 6(3): 372–378. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Guyer J I, 1997. Diversity and intensity in the scholarship on African agricultural change. Reviews in Anthropology, 26(1): 13–32. doi: 10.1080/00988157.1997.9978165Google Scholar
  15. He Lian, 2000. Sanjiang Plain in China. Harbin: Heilongjiang Science and Technology Publishing House. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Houghton R A, 1994. The worldwide extent of land-use change. Bioscience, 44(5): 305–313. doi: 10.2307/1312380Google Scholar
  17. Houghton R A, Hackler J L, Lawrence K T, 1999. The U.S. carbon budget: contributions from land-use change. Science, 285(5427): 574–578. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5427.574Google Scholar
  18. Jensen J R, Rutchey K, Koch M S et al., 1995. Inland wetland change detection in the Everglades water conservation area 2A using a time series of normalized remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61(2): 199–209.Google Scholar
  19. Jia B Q, Zhang Z Q, Ci L J et al., 2004. Oasis land-use dynamics and its influence on the oasis environment in Xinjiang, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 56(1): 11–26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00002-8Google Scholar
  20. Kim D H, Lin S C, 2017. Human capital and natural resource dependence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 40: 92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2017.01.002Google Scholar
  21. Klemas V V, 2001. Remote sensing of landscape-level coastal environmental indicators. Environmental Management, 27(1): 47–57. doi: 10.1007/s002670010133Google Scholar
  22. Kundu S, Khare D, Mondal A, 2017. Landuse change impact on sub-watersheds prioritization by analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Ecological Informatics, 42: 100–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.10.007Google Scholar
  23. Lambin E F, Turner B L, Geist H J et al., 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11(4): 261–269. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3Google Scholar
  24. Langan C, Farmer J, Rivington M et al., 2018. Tropical wetland ecosystem service assessments in East Africa: a review of approaches and challenges. Environmental Modelling & Software, 102: 260–273. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.01.022Google Scholar
  25. Liu H Y, Zhang S K, Li Z F et al., 2004. Impacts on wetlands of large-scale land-use changes by agricultural development: the Small Sanjiang Plain, China. AMBIO, 33(6): 306–310. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-33.6.306Google Scholar
  26. Liu J Y, Liu M L, Deng X Z et al., 2002. The land use and land cover change database and its relative studies in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 12(3): 275–282. doi: 10.1007/BF02837545Google Scholar
  27. Liu J Y, Liu M L, Tian H Q et al., 2005. Spatial and temporal patterns of China’s cropland during 1990–2000: an analysis based on Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(4): 442–456. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.012Google Scholar
  28. Liu Xingtu, 1995. Wetland and its rational utilization and conservation in the Sanjiang Plain. In: Chen Yiyu (ed). Study of Wetlands in China. Beijing: Science Press, 108–117. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Liu Xingtu, Ma Xuehui, 2002. Natural Environmental Change and Ecological Protection in the Sanjiang Plain. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  30. Liu Z G, Ma X H, 1997. Effect of reclamation on soil environment in Sanjiang Plain. Pedosphere, 7(1): 73–78.Google Scholar
  31. Malekmohammadi B, Jahanishakib F, 2017. Vulnerability assessment of wetland landscape ecosystem services using driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) model. Ecological Indicators, 82: 293–303. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017. 06.060Google Scholar
  32. McKinley D C, Miller-Rushing A J, Ballard H L et al., 2017. Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208: 15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015Google Scholar
  33. McMurry S T, Belden J B, Smith L M et al., 2016. Land use effects on pesticides in sediments of prairie pothole wetlands in North and South Dakota. Science of the Total Environment, 565: 682–689. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.209Google Scholar
  34. Meyer W B, Turner II B L, 1994. Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mitsch W J, Gosselink J G, 2007. Wetlands. 4th ed. Hoboken: John Willey & Sons, Inc., 287–288.Google Scholar
  36. Orimoloye I R, Kalumba A M, Mazinyo S P et al., 2018. Geospatial analysis of wetland dynamics: wetland depletion and biodiversity conservation of Isimangaliso wetland, South Africa. Journal of King Saud University-Science. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus. 2018.03.004Google Scholar
  37. Pathirana A, Denekew H B, Veerbeek W et al., 2014. Impact of urban growth-driven landuse change on microclimate and extreme precipitation-A sensitivity study. Atmospheric Research, 138: 59–72. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.10.005Google Scholar
  38. Qi Fuli, Yang Xiangkui, Yang Guomin et al., 2009. Preliminary study of the sustainable utilization of groundwater resource in Sanjiang Plain. Journal of Heilongjiang Hydraulic Engineering, 36(4): 96–99. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  39. Qu Yi, Luo Chunyu, Zhang Hongqiang et al, 2018. Modeling the wetland restorability based on natural and anthropogenic impacts in Sanjiang Plain, China. Ecological Indicators, 91: 429–438. doi: /10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.008Google Scholar
  40. Rao K S, Pant R, 2001. Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a typical micro watershed in the mid elevation zone of central Himalaya, India. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 862: 113–124. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00274-7Google Scholar
  41. Ricaurte L F, Olaya-Rodríguez M H, Cepeda-Valencia J et al., 2017. Future impacts of drivers of change on wetland ecosystem services in Colombia. Global Environmental Change, 44: 158–169. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.04.001Google Scholar
  42. Seidl A F, Moraes A S, 2000. Global valuation of ecosystem services: application to the Pantanal da Nhecolandia, Brazil. Ecological Economics, 33(1): 1–6. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009-(99)00146-9Google Scholar
  43. Shang Lina, Wu Zhengfang, Yang Qing et al., 2004. The effects of fire on the nutrient status of wetland soil in Sanjiang Plain. Wetland Science, 2004, 2(1): 54–60. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  44. Shuangyashan City Bureau of Statistics, Heilongjiang Province, 2006–2016. Social Economic Statistical Yearbook of Shuangyashan. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  45. Song Changchun, Wang Yiyong, Yan Baixing et al., 2004. The changes of the soil hydrothermal condition and the dynamics of C, N after the mire tillage. Environmental Science, 25(3): 150–154. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  46. Song Kaishan, Liu Dianwei, Wang Zongmin et al., 2008. Land use change in Sanjiang plain and its driving forces analysis since 1954. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(1): 93–104. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  47. Southworth J, Munroe D, Nagendra H, 2004. Land cover change and landscape fragmentation: comparing the utility of continuous and discrete analyses for a western Honduras region. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 101(2–3): 185–205. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.011Google Scholar
  48. Sun B D, Cui L J, Li W, et al., 2018. A meta-analysis of coastal wetland ecosystem services in Liaoning Province, China. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 200: 349–358. doi: 10. 1016/j.ecss.2017.11.006Google Scholar
  49. Tolba M K, El-Kholy O A, 1992. The World Environment 1972–1992, Two Decades of Challenge. London: Chapman & Hall, 37–52.Google Scholar
  50. Uluocha N O, Okeke I C, 2004. Implications of wetlands degradation for water resources management: lessons from Nigeria. Geo Journal, 61(2): 151–154. doi: 10.1007/s10708-004-2868-3Google Scholar
  51. Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J et al., 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325): 494–499. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5325.494Google Scholar
  52. Vogelmann J E, Sohl T, Howard S M, 1998. Regional characterization of land cover using multiple sources of data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 64(1): 45–47.Google Scholar
  53. Wang Z M, Zhang B, Zhang S Q et al., 2006. Changes of land use and of ecosystem service values in Sanjiang Plain, NortheastChina. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 112(1–3): 69–91. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-0312-5Google Scholar
  54. Williams M, 1993. Protection and retrospection. In: Williams M (ed). Wetlands: A Threatened Landscape. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Wo Xiaolan, Sun Xiangtai, Peng Zhen, 2009. Study on status of ground water exploitation and countermeasures for sustainable utilization in the Sanjiang Plain, China. Heilongjiang Science and Technology of Water Conservancy, 37(4): 45–46. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  56. Wondie A, 2018. Ecological conditions and ecosystem services of wetlands in the Lake Tana Area, Ethiopia. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 18(2): 231–244. doi: 10.1016/j.ecohyd. 2018. 02.002Google Scholar
  57. Xie Y C, Yu M, Tian G J et al., 2005. Socio-economic driving forces of arable land conversion: a case study of Wuxian City, China. Global Environmental Change, 15(3): 238–252. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.002Google Scholar
  58. Yan F Q, Zhang S W, Liu X T, et al. Monitoring spatiotemporal changes of marshes in the Sanjiang Plain, China. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 104: 184–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017. 04.032Google Scholar
  59. Zalidis G C, Mantzavelas A L, Gourvelou E, 1997. Environmental impacts on Greek wetlands. Wetlands, 17(3): 339–345. doi: 10.1007/BF03161423Google Scholar
  60. Zhang Jinbo, Song Changchun, 2004. Effects of different landuse on soil physical—chemical properties in the Sanjiang Plain. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 35(3): 371–373. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  61. Zhang J B, Song C C, Yang W Y, 2007. Tillage effects on soil carbon fractions in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Soil and Tillage Research, 93(1): 102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.still. 2006.03.014Google Scholar
  62. Zhang J Y, Ma K M, Fu B J, 2010. Wetland loss under the impact of agricultural development in the Sanjiang Plain, NE China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 166(1–4): 139–148. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0990-xGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhou Wangming, Wang Jinda, Liu Jingshuang et al., 2009. Variation trends of snow-cover in Sanjiang plain anti their relation to temperature and precipitation. System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture, 25(2): 243–247.Google Scholar
  64. Zhu Hui, Yan Baixing, 2011. Export of nitrogen by lateral seepage from paddy field in Sanjiang Plain. Environmental Science, 32(1): 108–112. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  65. Zhuang Dafang, Liu Jiyuan, Liu Mingliang, 1999. Research activities on land-use/cover change in the past ten years in China using space technology. Chinese Geographical Science, 9(4): 330–334. doi: 10.1007/s11769-999-0006-3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press and Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chong Fang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhidan Wen
    • 1
  • Lin Li
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jia Du
    • 1
  • Ge Liu
    • 1
  • Xiaodi Wang
    • 1
    • 4
  • Kaishan Song
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Northeast Institute of Geography and AgroecologyChinese Academy of SciencesChangchunChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Earth ScienceIndiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA
  4. 4.School of Geography and TourismHarbin UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations