Advertisement

Chinese Geographical Science

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 26–36 | Cite as

Fish Assemblage Responses to a Low-head Dam Removal in the Lancang River

  • Chengzhi Ding
  • Xiaoming Jiang
  • Lieen Wang
  • Hui Fan
  • Liqiang Chen
  • Jinming Hu
  • Hailong Wang
  • Yifeng Chen
  • Xiaotao Shi
  • Hao Chen
  • Bohui Pan
  • Liuyong Ding
  • Chao Zhang
  • Daming He
Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Dam removal is becoming an effective approach for aquatic biodiversity restoration in damming river in order to balance the aquatic ecosystem conservation with large-scale cascade damming. However, the effects of dam removal on fish communities in Asian mountainous rivers, which are dominated by Cypriniformes fishes, are still not well known. To determine whether dam removal on a mountainous river benefit restoration of fish diversity, we investigated the response of fish assemblage to dam removal using a before- after-control-impact design in two tributaries of the Lancang River (dam removal river: the Jidu River, and control river: the Fengdian River). Fish surveys were conducted one year prior to dam removal (2012) and three years (2013–2015) following dam removal. We observed rapidly and notably spatio-temporal changes in fish biodiversity metrics and assemblage structure, occurring in the Jidu River within the first year after dam removal. Overall, fish species richness, density and Shannon-Wiener diversity all increased immediately in above- and below-dam sites, and maintained a stable level in subsequent years, compared to unchanged situation in the control river. All sites in the Jidu River experienced shifts in fish composition after dam removal, with the greatest temporal changes occurred in sites below- and above- the former dam, resulting in a temporal homogenization tendency in the dam removed river. These findings suggest that dam removal can benefit the recovery of habitat conditions and fish community in Asian mountainous rivers, but the results should be further evaluated when apply to other dammed rivers since the dam age, fluvial geomorphology and situation of source populations could all affect the responses of fish assemblages.

Keywords

fish diversity dam demolition habitat recovery Cypriniformes international rivers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to HE Linbao, HE Guimei, HE Nan, LI Zhengfei, WANG Junjun, SUN Zhiwei, ZHANG Ping, SUN Jie, HE Zhenglin, HE Jinyuan and HE Wangbin for sample collection and experimental assistance.

References

  1. ReferencesGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson M J, 2006. Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics, 62(1): 245–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00440.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltz D M, Vondracek B, Brown L R et al., 1987. Influence of temperature on microhabitat choice by fishes in a california stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 116(1): 12–20. doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(1987)116<12:IOTOMC>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bednarek A T, 2001. Undamming rivers: A review of the ecological impacts of dam removal. Environmental Management, 27(6): 803–814. doi: 10.1007/s002670010189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bulow F J, Webb M A, Crumby W D et al., 1988. Management briefs: Effectiveness of a fish barrier dam in limiting movement of rough fishes from a reservoir into a tributary stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 8(2): 273–275. doi: 10.1577/1548-8675(1988)008<0273:MBEOAF>2.3.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burroughs B A, Hayes D B, Klomp K D et al., 2009. Effects of stronach dam removal on fluvial geomorphology in the pine river, michigan, united states. Geomorphology, 110(3–4): 96–107. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.03.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Catalano M J, Bozek M A, Pellett T D, 2007. Effects of dam removal on fish assemblage, structure, and spatial distributions in the baraboo river, wisconsin. North American Journal Of Fisheries Management, 27: 519–530. doi: 10.1577/M06-001.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang H Y, Chiu M C, Chuang Y L et al., 2017. Community responses to dam removal in a subtropical mountainous stream. Aquatic Sciences, 79(4): 967–983. doi: 10.1007/s00027-017-0545-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Yiyu. 1998. Fauna Sinica Osteichthyes: Cypriniformes. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Chu Xinluo, Zheng Baoshan, Dai Dingyuan. 1999. Fauna Sinica, Osteichthyes, Siluriformes. Beijng: Science Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Cummins K W, Klug M J, 1979. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10: 147–172. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.001051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dorobek A, Sullivan S M P, Kautza A, 2015. Short-term consequences of lowhead dam removal for fish assemblages in an urban river system. River Systems, 21(2–3): 125–139. doi: 10.1127/rs/2015/0098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doyle M W, Stanley E H, Orr C H et al., 2005. Stream ecosystem response to small dam removal: lessons from the heartland. Geomorphology, 71(1–2): 227–244. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dudley R K, Platania S P, 2007. Flow regulation and fragmentation imperil pelagic spawning fishes. Ecological Applications, 17(7): 2074–2086. doi: 10.1890/06-1252.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fagan W F, 2002. Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations. Ecology, 83(12): 3243–3249. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[3243:CFAERI]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Froese R, Pauly D, 2018. Fishbase. World Wide Web Electronic Publication. Available at: http://www.fishbase.org.Google Scholar
  17. Fullerton A H, Burnett K M, Steel E A et al., 2010. Hydrological connectivity for riverine fish: Measurement challenges and research opportunities. Freshwater Biology, 55(11): 2215–2237. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02448.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardner C, Coghlan S M, Zydlewski J et al., 2013. Distribution and abundance of stream fishes in relation to barriers: Implications for monitoring stream recovery after barrier removal. River Research and Applications, 29(1): 65–78. doi: ·10.1002/rra.1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hart D D, Johnson T E, Bushaw-Newton K L et al., 2002. Dam removal: challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration. BioScience, 52(8): 669–682. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0669:DRCAOF]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helms B S, Werneke D C, Gangloff M M et al., 2011. The influence of low-head dams on fish assemblages in streams across alabama. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 30(4): 1095–1106. doi: 10.1899/10-093.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang H L, Yan Z, 2009. Present situation and future prospect of hydropower in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(6–7): 1652–1656. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang, Xiangfei, Chen Weimin, Cai Qiming, 1999. Survey, Observation and Analysis of Lake Ecology. Beijing: Standards Press of China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  23. Kanehl P D, Lyons J, Nelson J E, 1997. Changes in the habitat and fish community of the milwaukee river, wisconsin, following removal of the woolen mills dam. North american journal of fisheries management. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 17(2): 387–400. doi: 10.1577/1548-8675(1997)017<0387:CITHAF>2.3.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katano O, Nakamura T, Abe S et al., 2006. Comparison of fish communities between above- and below-dam sections of small streams; barrier effect to diadromous fishes. Journal of Fish Biology, 68(3): 767–782. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2006.00964.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. King S, Warburton K, 2007. The environmental preferences of three species of australian freshwater fish in relation to the effects of riparian degradation. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 78(4): 307–316. doi: 10.1007/s10641-006-9098-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kornis M S, Weidel B C, Powers S M et al., 2015. Fish community dynamics following dam removal in a fragmented agricultural stream. Aquatic Sciences, 77(3): 465–480. doi: 10.1007/s00027-014-0391-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu Mingdian, Chen Daqing, Duan Xinbing et al., 2011. Ichthyofauna composition and distribution of fishes in yunnan section of lancang river. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 18(1): 156–170. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Magilligan F J, Nislow K H, 2005. Changes in hydrologic regime by dams. Geomorphology, 71(1–2): 61–78. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.08.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martinez P J, Chart T E, Trammell M A et al., 1994. Fish species composition before and after construction of a main stem reservoir on the white river, colorado. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 40(3): 227–239. doi: 10.1007/BF00002509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mchenry M L, Pess G R, 2008. An overview of monitoring options for assessing the response of salmonids and their aquatic ecosystems in the elwha river following dam removal. Northwest Science, 82(S1): 29–47. doi: 10.3955/0029-344X-82.S.I.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McLaughlin R L, Porto L, Noakes D L G et al., 2006. Effects of low-head barriers on stream fishes: taxonomic affiliations and morphological correlates of sensitive species. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 63(4): 766–779. doi: 10.1139/f05-256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson J S. 2006. Fishes of the World (4th Edition). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  33. Nilsson C, Reidy C A, Dynesius M et al., 2005. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science, 308(5720): 405–408. doi: 10.1126/science.1107887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Connor J E, Duda J J, Grant G E, 2015. 1000 dams down and counting. Science, 348(6234): 496–497. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olden J D, Naiman R J, 2010. Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity. Freshwater Biology, 55(1): 86–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02179.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olden J D, Poff L R, 2003. Toward a mechanism understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization. American Naturalist, 162: 442–460. doi: 10.1086/378212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perkin J S, Gido K B, 2012. Fragmentation alters stream fish community structure in dendritic ecological networks. Ecological Applications, 22(8): 2176–2187. doi: 10.1890/12-0318.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Poulos H M, Miller K E, Kraczkowski M L et al., 2014. Fish assemblage response to a small dam removal in the eightmile river system, connecticut, USA. Environmental Management, 54(5): 1090–1101. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0314-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rahel F J, 2002. Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33: 291–315. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sá-Oliveira J C, Hawes J E, Isaac-Nahum V J et al., 2015. Upstream and downstream responses of fish assemblages to an eastern amazonian hydroelectric dam. Freshwater Biology, 60(10): 2037–2050. doi: 10.1111/fwb.12628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stanley E H, Doyle M W, 2003. Trading off: The ecological effects of dam removal. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(1): 15–22. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0015:TOTEEO]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stewart-Oaten A, Murdoch W W, Parker K R, 1986. Environmental impact assessment: ‘pseudoreplication’ in time? Ecology, 67(4): 929–940. doi: 10.2307/1939815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tian Zhongxing, 2013. Small hydropower plants and in the building of a conservation culture. China Water Resources, 151: 3–14. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  44. Tsuboi J I, Endou S, Morita K, 2010. Habitat fragmentation by damming threatens coexistence of stream-dwelling charr and salmon in the fuji river, Japan. Hydrobiologia, 650(1): 223–232. doi: 10.1007/s10750-009-0076-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watters G T, 1996. Small dams as barriers to freshwater mussels (bivalvia, unionoida) and their hosts. Biological Conservation, 75(1): 79–85. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00034-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yan Y Z, Wang H, Zhu R et al., 2013. Influences of low-head dams on the fish assemblages in the headwater streams of the qingyi watershed, China. Environmental Biology Of Fishes, 96(4): 495–506. doi: 10.1007/s10641-012-0035-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang C, Ding L Y, Ding C Z et al., 2018. Responses of species and phylogenetic diversity of fish communities in the Lancang River to hydropower development and exotic invasions. Ecological Indicators, 90: 261–279. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chengzhi Ding
    • 1
  • Xiaoming Jiang
    • 2
  • Lieen Wang
    • 3
  • Hui Fan
    • 1
  • Liqiang Chen
    • 1
  • Jinming Hu
    • 1
  • Hailong Wang
    • 3
  • Yifeng Chen
    • 4
  • Xiaotao Shi
    • 5
  • Hao Chen
    • 3
  • Bohui Pan
    • 3
  • Liuyong Ding
    • 1
  • Chao Zhang
    • 1
  • Daming He
    • 1
  1. 1.Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-securityYunnan UniversityKunmingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulic in Northwest Arid Region of ChinaXi’an University of TechnologyXi’anChina
  3. 3.Huaneng Lancang River Hydropower Co., LtdKunmingChina
  4. 4.Laboratory of Biological Invasion and Adaptive Evolution, Institute of HydrobiologyChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  5. 5.Engineering Research Center of Eco-environment in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, Ministry of EducationChina Three Gorges UniversityYichangChina

Personalised recommendations