Advertisement

Chinese Geographical Science

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 139–150 | Cite as

Effect of Short-term Forest Bathing in Urban Parks on Perceived Anxiety of Young-adults: A Pilot Study in Guiyang, Southwest China

  • Changwei Zhou
  • Lingbin Yan
  • Lifei YuEmail author
  • Hongxu WeiEmail author
  • Haoming Guan
  • Chongfei Shang
  • Feiyu Chen
  • Junzhou Bao
Article
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Forest can be taken as a natural therapy to alleviate perceived anxiety of visitors. Given the geographical difference between urban and rural forest environments, little is known about the urban forest therapy effect of anxiety alleviation with reference to the rural forest. In this study, forty-three university students (aged from 19 to 23) were recruited as participants to visit the forest parks at urban and rural areas of Guiyang City on 21 and 23 December 2016. The forest experience was separated by four sceneries. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires by self-evaluating specific anxiety change from 12 questions with scores from 1 to 10 at both entrance and exit of the parks. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test were used to compare the change of anti-anxiety scores during forest bathing and between urban and rural forests, respectively. Results revealed that forest bathing in the urban park can alleviate the anxiety from financial state (P = 0.0028), exam-pass pressure (P = 0.0040) and love-affair relationship (P = 0.0286). Although rural forest bathing can also alleviate the anxiety from financial state (P = 0.0222), meanwhile, it maintained the anxiety about campus life (P < 0.0001). Forest tree richness tended to be higher in the rural forest park than in the urban one, which in contrast decreased the anxiety alleviation from inter-communication in the rural forest park (P = 0.0487). Principle component analysis indicated that participants tended to perceive more decline of anxiety from social contact in the urban forest. In conclusion, university students were recommended to pay a short visit to the urban forest with partners if they felt anxious about personal affairs and felt necessary to talk with others. For general people’s visiting, urban forest trees can be controlled in diversity to some extent to look orderly and alleviate perceived anxiety.

Keywords

urbanization tension mental disease behavior disorder undergraduate well-being 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carvalho-Ribeiro S M, Lovett A, 2011. Is an attractive forest also considered well managed? Public preferences for forest cover and stand structure across a rural/urban gradient in northern Portugal. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(1): 46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Casado-Arzuaga I, Madariaga I, Onaindia M, 2013. Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. Journal of Environmental Management, 129: 33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chun M H, Chang M C, Lee S J, 2017. The effects of forest therapy on depression and anxiety in patients with chronic stroke. International Journal of Neuroscience, 127(3): 199–203. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2016.1170015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dekker J, Peen J, Koelen J et al., 2008. Psychiatric disorders and urbanization in Germany. BMC Public Health, 8: 17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dou Y H, Zhen L, De Groot R et al., 2017. Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality. Ecosystem Services, 24: 79–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dye C, 2008. Health and urban living. Science, 319(5864): 766–769. doi: 10.1126/science.1150198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erol S Y, 2012. Differences between urban and rural population with respect to demand on forestry aspects, in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir. Ciência Rural, 42(3): 436–443. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782012000300009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feinstein A, O’Connor P, Gray T et al., 1999. The effects of anxiety on psychiatric morbidity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 5(5): 323–326. doi: 10.1177/135245859900500504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frumkin H, 2001. Beyond toxicity: human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(3): 234–240. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00317-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galea S, 2011. The urban brain: new directions in research exploring the relation between cities and mood–anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 28(10): 857–862. doi: 10.1002/da.20868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guan H M, Wei H X, He X Y et al., 2017. The tree-species- specific effect of forest bathing on perceived anxiety alleviation of young-adults in urban forests. Annals of Forest Research, 60(2): 327–341. doi: 10.15287/afr.2017.897Google Scholar
  12. Hajrasouliha A, 2017. Campus score: measuring university campus qualities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158: 166–176. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofmann M, Gerstenberg T, Gillner S, 2017. Predicting tree preferences from visible tree characteristics. European Journal of Forest Research, 136(3): 421–432. doi: 10.1007/s10342-017-1042-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jankowiak W, Shen Y F, Yao S Y et al., 2015. Investigating love’s universal attributes: a research report from China. Cross–Cultural Research, 49(4): 422–436. doi: 10.1177/1069397115594355Google Scholar
  15. Jung W H, Woo J M, Ryu J S, 2015. Effect of a forest therapy program and the forest environment on female workers’ stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(2): 274–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim W, Lim S K, Chung E J et al., 2009. The effect of cognitive behavior therapy–based psychotherapy applied in a forest environment on physiological changes and remission of major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Investigation, 6(4): 245–254. doi: 10.4306/pi.2009.6.4.245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kinney P L, 2008. Climate change, air quality, and human health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(5): 459–467. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee J, Park B J, Tsunetsugu Y et al., 2009. Restorative effects of viewing real forest landscapes, based on a comparison with urban landscapes. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 24(3): 227–234. doi: 10.1080/02827580902903341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee J, Tsunetsugu Y, Takayama N et al., 2014. Influence of forest therapy on cardiovascular relaxation in young adults. Evidence–Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2014: 834360. doi: 10.1155/2014/834360Google Scholar
  20. Li Q, Morimoto K, Nakadai A et al., 2007. Forest bathing enhances human natural killer activity and expression of anti-cancer proteins. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, 20(S2): 3–8. doi: 10.1177/03946320070200S202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Q, Morimoto K, Kobayashi M et al., 2008. A forest bathing TRIP increases human natural killer activity and expression of anti-cancer proteins in female subjects. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, 22(1): 45–55.Google Scholar
  22. McMichael A J, Woodruff R E, Hales S, 2006. Climate change and human health: present and future risks. The Lancet, 367(9513): 859–869. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McNair D M, Lorr M, 1964. An analysis of mood in neurotics. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(6): 620–627. doi: 10.1037/h0040902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moran T P, Moser J S, 2015. The color of anxiety: neurobehavioral evidence for distraction by perceptually salient stimuli in anxiety. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(1): 169–179. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0314-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ochiai H, Ikei H, Song C et al., 2015. Physiological and Psychological effects of a forest therapy program on middle–aged females. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(12): 15222–15232. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121214984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Park B J, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T et al., 2007. Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest): using salivary cortisol and cerebral activity as indicators. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 26(2): 123–128. doi: 10.2114/jpa2.26.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Park B J, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T et al., 2009. Physiological effects of forest recreation in a young conifer forest in Hinokage Town, Japan. Silva Fennica, 43(2): 291–301. doi: 10.14214/sf.213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Park B J, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T et al., 2010. The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (Taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15(1): 18–26. doi: 10.1007/s12199-009-0086-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Park B J, Furuya K, Kasetani T et al., 2011. Relationship between psychological responses and physical environments in forest settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(1): 24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Patz J A, Campbell-Lendrum D, Holloway T et al., 2005. Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature, 438(7066): 310–317. doi: 10.1038/nature04188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pronczuka J, Surdub S, 2008. Children’s environmental health in the twenty-first century: challenges and solutions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1140(1): 143–154. doi: 10.1196/annals.1454.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rayburn N R, Otto M W, 2003. Cognitive–behavioral therapy for panic disorder: a review of treatment elements, strategies, and outcomes. CNS Spectrums, 8(5): 356–362. doi: 10.1017/S1092852900018617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Risal A, Manandhar K, Linde M et al., 2016. Anxiety and depression in Nepal: prevalence, comorbidity and associations. BMC Psychiatry, 16: 102. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0810-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Song C, Joung D, Ikei H et al., 2013. Physiological and psychological effects of walking on young males in urban parks in winter. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 32(1): 18. doi: 10.1186/1880-6805-32-18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Song C, Ikei H, Igarashi M et al., 2014. Physiological and psychological responses of young males during spring–time walks in urban parks. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 33(1): 8. doi: 10.1186/1880-6805-33-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Song C, Ikei H, Kobayashi M et al., 2015. Effect of forest walking on autonomic nervous system activity in middle–aged hypertensive individuals: a pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(3): 2687–2699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120302687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Song C, Ikei H, Miyazaki Y, 2016. Physiological effects of nature therapy: a review of the research in Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(8): 781. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sonntag-Öström E, Stenlund T, Nordin M et al., 2015. ‘Nature’s effect on my mind’–Patient’s qualitative experiences of a forest–based rehabilitation programme. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3): 607–614. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stigsdotter U K, Corazon S S, Sidenius U et al., 2017. It is not all bad for the grey city: A crossover study on physiological and psychological restoration in a forest and an urban environment. Health & Place, 46: 145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tierney P T, Dahl R, Chavez D, 2001. Cultural diversity in use of undeveloped natural areas by Los Angeles county residents. Tourism Management, 22(3): 271–277. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00058-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tsunetsugu Y, Park B J, Miyazaki Y, 2010. Trends in research related to ‘Shinrin–yoku’ (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing) in Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15(1): 27–37. doi: 10.1007/s12199-009-0091-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ulrich R S, 1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altman I (eds). Behaviour and the National Environment. Boston, MA: Springer, 85–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. UNDESA, 2012. World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision. USA: United Nations Publication.Google Scholar
  44. Vuletic D, Krajter S, Mrazek M et al., 2009. Non wood forest products and services: are we using them enough? Šumarski List, 133(3–4): 175–184.Google Scholar
  45. Wang X X, Rodiek S, Wu C Z et al., 2016. Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 15: 112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang T, Deng S Q, Ma Q Q et al., 2015. Evaluations of landscape locations along trails based on walking experiences and distances traveled in the Akasawa Forest Therapy Base, central Japan. Forests, 6(8): 2853–2878. doi: 10.3390/f6082853CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Changwei Zhou
    • 1
  • Lingbin Yan
    • 1
  • Lifei Yu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hongxu Wei
    • 2
    Email author
  • Haoming Guan
    • 2
  • Chongfei Shang
    • 1
  • Feiyu Chen
    • 1
  • Junzhou Bao
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Life ScienceGuizhou UniversityGuiyangChina
  2. 2.Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, Chinese Academy of SciencesChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations