Chinese Geographical Science

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 287–295 | Cite as

Developing China’s National Emission Trading Scheme: Experiences from Existing Global Schemes and China’s Pilot Programs

Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Market-based emission trading schemes (ETSs) are widely used in the developed world to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions which are perceived as the source of global climate change. China, as the largest GHG emitter in the world, is committed to introducing an ETS to reduce emissions. Here we reviewed existing ETSs and sustainable energy policies worldwide as well as China’s pilot programs. These studies were conducted in order to propose recommendations for national initiatives and strategies to be implemented in China in relation to climate change adaptation and mitigation. It has been shown that setting emission caps in the context of a national emission intensity target is difficult. However, implementing reliable systems for measurement, reporting, and verification of emissions are essential. A two-level management system (by central and provincial governments) for carbon trading is beneficial to ensure uniform standards and compliance while maintaining flexibility. Persistent political support from, and effective coordination of, policies by the government are crucial. In addition, strengthening of institutional innovation, and the establishment of a national GHG emissions information system, are of equal importance. This vital information could provide a great opportunity for China to re-define its economic growth and take global leadership in combatting climate change.

Keywords

carbon dioxide (CO2greenhouse gas emissions climate change energy policy pilot program 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ascioglu A, Comerton-Forde C, McInish T H, 2011. Stealth trading: the case of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19(2): 194–207. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2010.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Betsill M, Hoffmann M J, 2011. The contours of ‘Cap and Trade’: the evolution of emissions trading systems for greenhouse gases. Review of Policy Research, 28(1): 83–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00480.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betz R A, Schmidt T S, 2016. Transfer patterns in Phase I of the EU Emissions Trading System: a first reality check based on cluster analysis. Climate Policy, 16(4): 474–495. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1028319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böhringer C, Rosendahl K E, 2009. Strategic partitioning of emission allowances under the EU Emission Trading Scheme. Resource and Energy Economics, 31(3): 182–197. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brink C, Vollebergh H R J, van der Werf E, 2016. Carbon pricing in the EU: evaluation of different EU ETS reform options. Energy Policy, 97: 603–617. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaabane A, Ramudhin A, Paquet M, 2012. Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1): 37–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapple L, Clarkson P M, Gold D L, 2013. The cost of carbon: capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). ABACUS, 49(1): 1–33. doi: 10.1111/abac.12006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chevallier J, Le Pen Y, Sévi B, 2011. Options introduction and volatility in the EU ETS. Resource and Energy Economics, 33(4): 855–880. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Convery F J, Redmond L, 2007. Market and price developments in the European Union emissions trading scheme. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(1): 88–111. doi: 10.1093/reep/rem010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Convery F J, 2009. Origins and development of the EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics, 43(3): 391–412. doi: 10.1007/s10640-009-9275-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Perthuis C, Trotignon R, 2014. Governance of CO2 markets: lessons from the EU ETS. Energy Policy, 75: 100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Egenhofer C, 2007. The Making of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: status, prospects and implications for business. European Management Journal, 25(6): 453–463. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2007.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flues F, Löschel A, Lutz B J et al., 2014. Designing an EU energy and climate policy portfolio for 2030: implications of overlapping regulation under different levels of electricity demand. Energy Policy, 75: 91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hepburn C, Grubb M, Neuhoff K et al., 2006. Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why? Climate Policy, 6(1): 137–160. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hübler M, Voigt S, Löschel A, 2014. Designing an emissions trading scheme for China-An up-to-date climate policy assessment. Energy Policy, 75: 57–72. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jotzo F, Betz R, 2009. Australia’s emissions trading scheme: opportunities and obstacles for linking. Climate Policy, 9(4): 402–414. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2009.0624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim Y G, Lim J S, 2014. An emissions trading scheme design for power industries facing price regulation. Energy Policy, 75: 84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu Y, Lu Y Y, 2015. The Economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: a model-based scenario analysis. Applied Energy, 141: 96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu Y, Tan X J, Yu Y et al., 2017. Assessment of impacts of Hubei Pilot emission trading schemes in China–A CGE-analysis using TermCO2 model. Applied Energy, 189: 762–769. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montero J P, Sanchez J M, Katz R, 2002. A market-based environmental policy experiment in Chile. The Journal of Law and Economics, 45(1): 267–287. doi: 10.1086/324657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mu Y Q, Wang C, Cai W J, 2018. The economic impact of China’s INDC: distinguishing the roles of the renewable energy quota and the carbon market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81: 2955–2966. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Munnings C, Morgenstern R D, Wang Z M et al., 2016. Assessing the design of three carbon trading pilot programs in China. Energy Policy, 96: 688–699. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neuhoff K, Martinez K K, Sato M, 2006. Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocations to the electricity sector. Climate Policy, 6(1): 73–91. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Park H, Hong W K, 2014. Korea’s emission trading scheme and policy design issues to achieve market-efficiency and abatement targets. Energy Policy, 75: 73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perdan S, Azapagic A, 2011. Carbon trading: current schemes and future developments. Energy Policy, 39(10): 6040–6054. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ranson M, Stavins R N, 2016. Linkage of greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: learning from experience. Climate Policy, 16(3): 284–300. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.997658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. World Bank Group, 2016. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing. Warshinton D C: ECOFYs Vivid Economics.Google Scholar
  28. Wood P J, Jotzo F, 2011. Price floors for emissions trading. Energy Policy, 39(3): 1746–1753. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang D, Karplus V J, Cassisa C et al., 2014. Emissions trading in China: progress and prospects. Energy Policy, 75: 9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang Z X, 2015. Carbon emissions trading in China: the evolution from pilots to a nationwide scheme. Climate Policy, 15(S1): S104–S126. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1096231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang Z X, 2016. Making the transition to a low-carbon economy: the key challenges for China. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 3(2): 187–202. doi: 10.1002/app5.138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zheng Shuang, 2014. Investigation of 7 emissions trading pilot schemes in China. Energy of China, 36(2): 23–27. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bolun Ning
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Yongguan Zhu
    • 4
    • 5
  • Zhihong Xu
    • 3
  • Bojie Fu
    • 4
  1. 1.College of Natural Resources and EnvironmentUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Bureau of International CooperationChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.School of Bio-molecular and Physical SciencesGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  4. 4.State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Centre for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  5. 5.Institute of Urban EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesXiamenChina

Personalised recommendations